Fernández-Berrocal Pablo, Gutiérrez-Cobo María J, Rodriguez-Corrales Juan, Cabello Rosario
Department of Basic Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02227. eCollection 2017.
Teaching is a highly emotional and demanding profession. Developing emotional well-being among teachers will benefit not only the teachers themselves, but also their students. Previous studies have shown the protective role of emotional intelligence (EI) as well as inconsistencies in the years of teaching experience variable on positive and negative work-specific variables. The aim of the present study was to analyze how EI and years of teaching experience are related to affective well-being in teachers. Further, we analyze the moderator role of perceived EI on the link between level of teaching experience and affective well-being. For these purpose, 524 teachers from different Spanish public schools took part in the study. They first completed the Trait Meta-Mood Scale-24 (TMMS-24) for measuring perceived EI, which evaluates three scales: Attention to one's Feelings (Attention), Emotional Clarity (Clarity), and Mood Repair (Repair). Secondly, they completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) for affective well-being, which measures Positive Affect (PA) and Negative Affect (NA). Finally, teachers indicated their years of teaching experience. The results revealed that teaching experience and attention variables are counterproductive in determining lower PA and higher NA, respectively. Clarity and Repair appeared to be a significant determinant of PA and NA, with higher Clarity and Repair determining higher PA and lower NA. Moderator analyses showed how teaching experience significantly decreased PA in teachers who had average or low levels of Repair, but not for those with higher levels of this variable, emphasizing the important role of Repair as a protector of affective well-being in teachers. Limitations and future areas for research are discussed.
教学是一项情感高度投入且要求苛刻的职业。培养教师的情感幸福感不仅会使教师自身受益,也会让他们的学生受益。先前的研究表明了情商(EI)的保护作用,以及教学年限变量在特定工作的积极和消极变量方面存在的不一致性。本研究的目的是分析EI和教学年限如何与教师的情感幸福感相关。此外,我们分析了感知到的EI在教学经验水平与情感幸福感之间的联系中所起的调节作用。为此,来自西班牙不同公立学校的524名教师参与了该研究。他们首先完成了用于测量感知到的EI的特质元情绪量表 - 24(TMMS - 24),该量表评估三个维度:对自身情绪的关注(关注)、情绪清晰度(清晰度)和情绪修复(修复)。其次,他们完成了用于测量情感幸福感的积极和消极情感量表(PANAS),该量表测量积极情感(PA)和消极情感(NA)。最后,教师们表明了他们的教学年限。结果显示,教学经验和关注维度分别在决定较低的PA和较高的NA方面产生了反作用。清晰度和修复似乎是PA和NA的重要决定因素,较高的清晰度和修复决定了较高的PA和较低的NA。调节分析表明,教学经验在修复水平处于平均或较低水平的教师中显著降低了PA,但对于该变量水平较高的教师则不然,这强调了修复作为教师情感幸福感保护因素的重要作用。文中还讨论了研究的局限性和未来的研究方向。