Wu Qinglu, Zhao Junfeng, Zhao Guoxiang, Li Xiaoming, Du Hongfei, Chi Peilian
Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China.
J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(8):3909-3927. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00566-7. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
Two studies were conducted to explore the patterns of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) while considering collectivist cultural specificity (dialecticism) and to examine the associations of affective profiles with psychosocial adjustment.
We used two Chinese samples, one comprising adults with adverse childhood experiences ( = 488) and one comprising ordinary adolescents ( = 635). The participants completed scales on PA, NA, and psychosocial adjustment, including mental health problems (depressive symptoms, anxiety), personal strengths (self-esteem, gratitude, resilience), and life satisfaction.
Three profiles were identified through latent profile analysis: well-adjusted (high PA, low NA), low affective (low PA, low NA), and moderate affective (moderate PA, moderate NA). Participants in the well-adjusted profile had the fewest mental health problems (depressive symptoms, anxiety) and scored highest on personal strengths (self-esteem, gratitude, resilience) and life satisfaction. Participants in the low affective profile had fewer mental health problems than those in the moderate affective profile.
Individual differences and cultural variations should be considered when exploring affective profiles. Future interventions aimed at promoting affective well-being should accommodate dialecticism and individual differences in the target population.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10902-022-00566-7.
进行两项研究以探讨积极情感(PA)和消极情感(NA)的模式,同时考虑集体主义文化特异性(辩证主义),并检验情感特征与心理社会适应之间的关联。
我们使用了两个中国样本,一个由有童年不良经历的成年人组成(n = 488),另一个由普通青少年组成(n = 635)。参与者完成了关于PA、NA和心理社会适应的量表,包括心理健康问题(抑郁症状、焦虑)、个人优势(自尊、感恩、心理韧性)和生活满意度。
通过潜在特征分析确定了三种特征:适应良好型(高PA、低NA)、低情感型(低PA、低NA)和中等情感型(中等PA、中等NA)。适应良好型的参与者心理健康问题(抑郁症状、焦虑)最少,在个人优势(自尊、感恩、心理韧性)和生活满意度方面得分最高。低情感型的参与者比中等情感型的参与者心理健康问题更少。
在探索情感特征时应考虑个体差异和文化差异。未来旨在促进情感幸福的干预措施应适应目标人群的辩证主义和个体差异。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10902-022-00566-7获取的补充材料。