Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, Milstein Hospital Building, Suite 8GS-300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):33-39. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0491-7.
Agitation is common after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and may be independently associated with outcomes. We sought to determine whether the duration of agitation and fluctuating consciousness were also associated with outcomes in patients with SAH.
We identified all patients with positive Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores from a prospective observational cohort of patients with SAH from 2011 to 2015. Total duration of agitation was extrapolated for each patient using available RASS scores, and 24-h mean and standard deviation (SD) of RASS scores were calculated for each patient. We also calculated each patient's duration of substantial fluctuation of consciousness, defined as the number of days with 24-h RASS SD > 1. Patients were stratified by 3-month outcome using the modified Rankin scale, and associations with outcome were assessed via logistic regression.
There were 98 patients with at least one positive RASS score, with median total duration of agitation 8 h (interquartile range [IQR] 4-18), and median duration of substantially fluctuating consciousness 2 days (IQR 1-3). Unfavorable 3-month outcome was significantly associated with a longer duration of fluctuating consciousness (odds ratio [OR] per day, 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.20; p = 0.031), but a briefer duration of agitation (OR per hour, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99; p = 0.031).
Though a longer duration of fluctuating consciousness was associated with worse outcomes in our cohort, total duration of agitation was not, and may have had the opposite effect. Our findings should therefore challenge the intensity with which agitation is often treated in SAH patients.
蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后常发生激越,且可能与结局独立相关。我们旨在确定 SAH 患者的激越持续时间和意识波动是否也与结局相关。
我们从 2011 年至 2015 年的前瞻性观察性 SAH 患者队列中,确定了所有阳性 Richmond 激越镇静量表(RASS)评分的患者。每位患者的激越总持续时间通过可用的 RASS 评分推断,每位患者的 24 小时 RASS 评分均值和标准差(SD)也进行了计算。我们还计算了每位患者意识明显波动的持续时间,定义为 RASS SD>1 的 24 小时天数。根据改良 Rankin 量表对患者进行 3 个月结局分层,并通过逻辑回归评估与结局的相关性。
有 98 例患者至少有一次阳性 RASS 评分,激越总持续时间中位数为 8 小时(四分位距 [IQR] 4-18),意识明显波动的持续时间中位数为 2 天(IQR 1-3)。3 个月结局不良与意识波动持续时间较长显著相关(每增加一天的优势比 [OR],1.51;95%置信区间 [CI],1.04-2.20;p=0.031),但与激越持续时间较短相关(每小时的 OR,0.94;95% CI,0.89-0.99;p=0.031)。
尽管在我们的队列中,意识波动持续时间较长与结局较差相关,但激越总持续时间与结局无关,且可能有相反的影响。因此,我们的研究结果应挑战在 SAH 患者中激越治疗的强度。