Suppr超能文献

重症小儿创伤性脑损伤的神经学唤醒试验:一项长期的单中心经验。

The neurological wake-up test in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: a long term, single-center experience.

作者信息

Mulder Hilde D, Helfferich Jelte, Kneyber Martin C J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 23;12:1367337. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1367337. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the use and outcomes of the neurological wake-up test (NWT) in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (pTBI).

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center observational cohort study.

SETTING

Medical-surgical tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a university medical center and Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

Children younger than 18 years with severe TBI [i.e., Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of ≤8] admitted between January 2010 and December 2020. Subjects with non-traumatic brain injury were excluded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 168 TBI patients admitted, 36 (21%) met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 8.5 years [2 months to 16 years], 5 patients were younger than 6 months. Median initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Motor Scale (GMS) was 6 [3-8] and 3 [1-5]. NWTs were initiated in 14 (39%) patients, with 7 (50%) labelled as successful. Fall from a height was the underlying injury mechanism in those seven. NWT-failure occurred in patients admitted after traffic accidents. Sedation use in both NWT-subgroups (successful vs. failure) was comparable. Cause of NWT-failure was non-arousal (71%) or severe agitation (29%). Subjects with NWT failure subsequently had radiological examination (29%), repeat NWT (43%), continuous interruption of sedation (14%) or intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring (14%). The primary reason for not doing NWTs was intracranial hypertension in 59%. Compared to the NWT-group, the non-NWT group had a higher PRISM III score (18.9 vs. 10.6), lower GCS/GMS at discharge, more associated trauma, and circulatory support. Nine patients (25%) died during their PICU admission, none of them had an NWT.

CONCLUSION

We observed limited use of NWTs in pediatric severe TBI. Patients who failed the NWT were indistinguishable from those without NWT. Both groups were more severely affected compared to the NWT successes. Therefore, our results may indicate that only a select group of severe pTBI patients qualify for the NWT.

摘要

目的

描述神经唤醒试验(NWT)在小儿重度创伤性脑损伤(pTBI)中的应用及结果。

设计

回顾性单中心观察性队列研究。

地点

大学医学中心的外科三级小儿重症监护病房(PICU)和一级创伤中心。

患者

2010年1月至2020年12月期间收治的18岁以下重度TBI患儿[即格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)≤8]。排除非创伤性脑损伤患者。

测量指标及主要结果

168例TBI患者中,36例(21%)符合纳入标准。中位年龄为8.5岁[2个月至16岁],5例患者年龄小于6个月。初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和格拉斯哥运动量表(GMS)的中位数分别为6[3 - 8]和3[1 - 5]。14例(39%)患者进行了NWT,其中7例(50%)标记为成功。这7例患者的潜在损伤机制为高处坠落。交通事故后入院的患者出现NWT失败。NWT两个亚组(成功与失败)的镇静药物使用情况相当。NWT失败的原因是未唤醒(71%)或严重躁动(29%)。NWT失败的患者随后进行了影像学检查(29%)、重复NWT(43%)、持续中断镇静(14%)或颅内压(ICP)监测(14%)。未进行NWT的主要原因是颅内高压,占59%。与NWT组相比,非NWT组的PRISM III评分更高(18.9对10.6),出院时GCS/GMS更低,合并创伤更多,且需要循环支持。9例(25%)患者在PICU住院期间死亡,均未进行NWT。

结论

我们观察到NWT在小儿重度TBI中的应用有限。NWT失败的患者与未进行NWT的患者难以区分。与NWT成功的患者相比,两组受影响更严重。因此,我们的结果可能表明只有一小部分重度pTBI患者适合进行NWT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb9a/10920253/c23085d1ba6e/fped-12-1367337-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验