• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 Eckardt 症状评分作为贲门失弛缓症严重程度衡量指标的可靠性和结构有效性。

Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jun;30(6):e13287. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13287. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1111/nmo.13287
PMID:29315993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5992017/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a disease of mechanical esophageal dysfunction characterized by dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, and malnutrition. The Eckardt symptom score (ESS) is the gold standard self-report assessment tool. Current guidelines outline a three-step approach to patient reported outcomes measure design. Developed prior to these policies, the ESS has not undergone rigorous testing of its reliability and validity.

METHODS

Adult achalasia patients retrospectively identified via a patient registry were grouped based on treatment history. Patients were grouped PREPOST (completed ESS, GERDQ, brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire, NIH PROMIS Global Health, high resolution manometry, timed barium esophagram prior to treatment and after) and POST (completed measures only after treatment). Clinical characteristics, treatment type and date were obtained via medical record. Standardized psychometric analyses for reliability and construct validity were performed.

KEY RESULTS

107 patients identified; 83 POST and 24 PREPOST. The ESS has fair internal consistency and split-half reliability with a single factor structure. Dysphagia accounts for half the variance in ESS, while chest pain and weight loss account for 10% each. Pre-post-surgical assessment demonstrates improvements in ESS, except for weight loss. Effect sizes range from 0.24 to 2.53, with greatest change in regurgitation. Validity of the ESS is supported by modest correlations with GERDQ, HRQOL, and physiological data.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The ESS demonstrates fair reliability and validity, with a single factor structure mostly explained by dysphagia. Based on psychometric findings, weight loss and chest pain items may be decreasing ESS reliability and validity. Further assessment of the ESS under FDA guidelines is warranted.

摘要

背景

贲门失弛缓症是一种机械性食管功能障碍疾病,其特征为吞咽困难、胸痛、反流和营养不良。Eckardt 症状评分(ESS)是金标准的自我报告评估工具。目前的指南概述了患者报告结局测量设计的三步法。在制定这些政策之前,ESS 尚未经过可靠性和有效性的严格测试。

方法

通过患者登记处回顾性确定成年贲门失弛缓症患者,根据治疗史进行分组。患者分为 PREPOST(ESS、GERDQ、简短食管吞咽困难问卷、NIH PROMIS 全球健康、高分辨率测压、治疗前和治疗后时间性钡餐食管造影检查均已完成)和 POST(仅治疗后完成测量)。通过病历获取临床特征、治疗类型和日期。进行了可靠性和结构有效性的标准化心理测量分析。

主要结果

确定了 107 例患者;83 例 POST 和 24 例 PREPOST。ESS 具有良好的内部一致性和半分可靠性,具有单一的因子结构。吞咽困难占 ESS 变异的一半,而胸痛和体重减轻各占 10%。术前和术后评估显示 ESS 有所改善,除体重减轻外。效应大小范围从 0.24 到 2.53,反流的变化最大。ESS 的有效性得到 GERDQ、HRQOL 和生理数据的适度相关性的支持。

结论和推论

ESS 具有良好的可靠性和有效性,具有单一的因子结构,主要由吞咽困难解释。根据心理测量学的发现,体重减轻和胸痛项目可能会降低 ESS 的可靠性和有效性。需要根据 FDA 指南进一步评估 ESS。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity.评估 Eckardt 症状评分作为贲门失弛缓症严重程度衡量指标的可靠性和结构有效性。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jun;30(6):e13287. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13287. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Fair reliability of eckardt scores in achalasia and non-achalasia patients: Psychometric properties of the eckardt spanish version in a multicentric study.贲门失弛缓症和非贲门失弛缓症患者 Eckardt 评分的可靠性相当:多中心研究中 Eckardt 西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Jun;32(6):e13827. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13827. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Improved Assessment of Bolus Clearance in Patients With Achalasia Using High-Resolution Impedance Manometry.使用高分辨率阻抗测压法改善贲门失弛缓症患者的射流排空评估。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;16(5):672-680.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.019. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Development and validation of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire.简短食管吞咽困难问卷的编制与验证
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Dec;28(12):1854-1860. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12889. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
5
Health-related quality of life and physiological measurements in achalasia.贲门失弛缓症患者的健康相关生活质量及生理测量指标
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Feb 1;30(2):1-5. doi: 10.1111/dote.12494.
6
Association of High-Resolution Manometry Metrics with the Symptoms of Achalasia and the Symptomatic Outcomes of Peroral Esophageal Myotomy.高分辨率测压指标与贲门失弛缓症症状及经口食管肌切开术症状性结局的关联
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0139385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139385. eCollection 2015.
7
Achalasia-an unnecessary long way to diagnosis.贲门失弛缓症——一条不必要的漫长诊断之路。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 1;30(5):1-6. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow004.
8
Correlation of esophageal clearance and dysphagia symptom assessment after treatment for achalasia.食管清除率与贲门失弛缓症治疗后吞咽困难症状评估的相关性。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Feb;4(1):55-61. doi: 10.1177/2050640615584732. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
The Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire shows better discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings than the Eckardt score: Results from a multicenter study.简短食管吞咽困难问卷对临床和测压结果的鉴别能力优于埃卡德特评分:一项多中心研究的结果。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Apr;34(4):e14228. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14228. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
10
Validation in French of the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire in Patients Referred For Esophageal Manometry.法文版简短食管吞咽困难问卷在食管测压患者中的验证。
Dysphagia. 2022 Apr;37(2):392-398. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10290-8. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of myotomy length on per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) outcomes for achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.肌切开长度对贲门失弛缓症经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)疗效的影响:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12155-9.
2
Safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy with endoscopic fundoplication compared with POEM alone: International multicenter cohort study.经口内镜下肌切开术联合内镜下胃底折叠术与单纯经口内镜下肌切开术相比的安全性和有效性:国际多中心队列研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Aug 7;13:a26556550. doi: 10.1055/a-2655-6550. eCollection 2025.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Achalasia Following Pneumatic Dilation Treatment: A Single Center Experience.贲门失弛缓症患者经气囊扩张治疗后的临床结局:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 2;14(15):5448. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155448.
4
Treatment of achalasia led to normalisation of energy metabolism and proteosynthesis dependent on the pool of circulating amino acids; metabolomic monitoring and body composition analysis on insufficient nutrition.贲门失弛缓症的治疗使能量代谢和依赖循环氨基酸池的蛋白质合成恢复正常;对营养不足进行代谢组学监测和身体成分分析。
Metabolomics. 2025 Aug 11;21(5):109. doi: 10.1007/s11306-025-02303-6.
5
Adding the patient perspective: the necessity of patient reported outcomes in cardiac surgery clinical trials.纳入患者视角:心脏手术临床试验中患者报告结局的必要性。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001239.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Benign Esophageal Disorders.良性食管疾病的患者报告结局指标
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003467.
7
Characteristics of achalasia and detection of pulmonary complications: A comparison of findings in younger and elderly patients.贲门失弛缓症的特征及肺部并发症的检测:年轻与老年患者的结果比较
Qatar Med J. 2024 Dec 24;2024(4):52. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.52. eCollection 2024.
8
Peroral Endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in pediatric achalasia: a retrospective cohort on institutional experience and quality of life.小儿贲门失弛缓症的经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM):基于机构经验和生活质量的回顾性队列研究
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jan 25;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03565-y.
9
Persistent body-weight change on achalasia and peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter cohort study.贲门失弛缓症及经口内镜下肌切开术后的持续性体重变化:一项多中心队列研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2025 May;60(5):535-545. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02205-9. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
10
Automatic three-dimensional reconstruction of the oesophagus in achalasia patients undergoing POEM: an innovative approach for evaluating treatment outcomes.贲门失弛缓症患者经 POEM 治疗的食管自动三维重建:评估治疗效果的一种创新方法。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 6;11(1):e001396. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001396.

本文引用的文献

1
Achalasia-Specific Quality of Life After Pneumatic Dilation or Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy With Partial Fundoplication: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.气囊扩张术或腹腔镜下贲门肌切开术加部分胃底折叠术后贲门失弛缓症患者的特定生活质量:一项多中心随机临床试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1536-1545. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.402. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
2
Development and validation of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire.简短食管吞咽困难问卷的编制与验证
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Dec;28(12):1854-1860. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12889. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
Development of the Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life Scale: A Hybrid Measure for Use Across Esophageal Conditions.西北食管生活质量量表的开发:一种适用于多种食管疾病的综合测量方法。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;111(4):493-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.20. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
4
High-Resolution Manometry Improves the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia: A Randomized Multicenter Study.高分辨率测压法提高吞咽困难患者食管动力障碍的诊断率:一项随机多中心研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):372-80. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.1. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
5
The surgical management of achalasia in the morbid obese patient.肥胖症患者贲门失弛缓症的外科治疗
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jun;19(6):1139-43. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2790-7. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
6
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类,第3.0版》
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of achalasia patients: a ten-year review of the clinical features.贲门失弛缓症患者的诊断与治疗:临床特征的十年回顾
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Sep;61(134):1611-6.
8
Treatment of achalasia with laparoscopic myotomy or pneumatic dilatation: long-term results of a prospective, randomized study.腹腔镜下肌切开术或气囊扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项前瞻性随机研究的长期结果
World J Surg. 2015 Mar;39(3):713-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2869-4.
9
Achalasia: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.贲门失弛缓症:临床诊断、流行病学、治疗和结局的综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 21;19(35):5806-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i35.5806.
10
ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia.ACG 临床指南:贲门失弛缓症的诊断和治疗。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.196. Epub 2013 Jul 23.