Vagadia Brinda Harish, Vanga Sai Kranthi, Singh Ashutosh, Gariepy Yvan, Raghavan Vijaya
Department of Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Studies, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada.
School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Foods. 2018 Jan 8;7(1):6. doi: 10.3390/foods7010006.
Soymilk is lower in calories compared to cow's milk, since it is derived from a plant source (no cholesterol) and is an excellent source of protein. Despite the beneficial factors, soymilk is considered as one of the most controversial foods in the world. It contains serine protease inhibitors which lower its nutritional value and digestibility. Processing techniques for the elimination of trypsin inhibitors and lipoxygenase, which have shorter processing time and lower production costs are required for the large-scale manufacturing of soymilk. In this study, the suitable conditions of time and temperature are optimized during microwave processing to obtain soymilk with maximum digestibility with inactivation of trypsin inhibitors, in comparison to the conventional thermal treatment. The microwave processing conditions at a frequency of 2.45 GHz and temperatures of 70 °C, 85 °C and 100 °C for 2, 5 and 8 min were investigated and were compared to conventional thermal treatments at the same temperature for 10, 20 and 30 min. Response surface methodology is used to design and optimize the experimental conditions. Thermal processing was able to increase digestibility by 7% (microwave) and 11% (conventional) compared to control, while trypsin inhibitor activity reduced to 1% in microwave processing and 3% in conventional thermal treatment when compared to 10% in raw soybean.
与牛奶相比,豆浆的热量更低,因为它来源于植物(不含胆固醇),且是优质的蛋白质来源。尽管有这些有益因素,但豆浆被认为是世界上最具争议的食物之一。它含有丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂,这降低了其营养价值和消化率。大规模生产豆浆需要能够消除胰蛋白酶抑制剂和脂氧合酶的加工技术,且加工时间短、生产成本低。在本研究中,与传统热处理相比,优化了微波处理过程中的时间和温度适宜条件,以获得胰蛋白酶抑制剂失活且消化率最高的豆浆。研究了在2.45GHz频率、70℃、85℃和100℃温度下分别处理2、5和8分钟的微波处理条件,并与在相同温度下分别处理10、20和30分钟的传统热处理进行比较。采用响应面法设计和优化实验条件。与对照组相比,热处理使消化率提高了7%(微波处理)和11%(传统处理),而与未加工大豆中的10%相比,微波处理时胰蛋白酶抑制剂活性降至1%,传统热处理时降至3%。