• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

50 岁至 74 岁人群结肠镜检查后结直肠癌发病率的时间趋势:一项基于人群的研究。

Temporal trends in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates in 50- to 74-year-old persons: a population-based study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Toronto) and ICES uOttawa, Ontario, Canada.

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Toronto) and ICES uOttawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1324-1334.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.027
PMID:29317271
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed between 6 and 36 months after colonoscopy, termed postcolonoscopy CRCs (PCCRCs), arise primarily due to missed or inadequately treated neoplasms during colonoscopy. Introduction of multiple quality indicators and technological advances to colonoscopy practice should have reduced the PCCRC rate over time. We assessed temporal trends in the population rate of PCCRC as a measure of changing colonoscopy quality.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of persons aged 50 to 74 years without advanced risk factors for CRC who underwent complete colonoscopy in Ontario, Canada between 1996 and 2010. We defined the PCCRC rate as the proportion of individuals diagnosed with CRC within 36 months of colonoscopy that had PCCRC. We compared age-adjusted and sex-adjusted rates of PCCRC over time based on 3 periods (1996-2001, 2001-2006 and 2006-2010) and assessed the independent association between time period and PCCRC risk through multivariable regression, with respect to all PCCRCs, proximal PCCRC and distal PCCRC.

RESULTS

There was a marked increase in colonoscopy volumes over the study period, particularly in younger age groups and non-hospital settings. Among 1,093,658 eligible persons the PCCRC rate remained stable at approximately 8% over the 15-year study period. The adjusted odds of PCCRC, distal PCCRC and proximal PCCRC, comparing the 2006 to 2010 period with the 1996 to 2001 period, were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.31), 1.11 (95% CI, 0.91-1.34), and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.94-1.38), respectively. Temporal trends in PCCRC risk did not differ by endoscopist specialty or institutional setting after covariate adjustment.

CONCLUSION

The PCCRC rate in Ontario has remained consistently high over time. Widespread initiatives are needed to improve colonoscopy quality.

摘要

背景与目的

结肠镜检查后 6 至 36 个月内诊断出的结直肠癌(CRC),称为结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRC),主要是由于结肠镜检查期间漏诊或治疗不充分的肿瘤引起的。引入多个质量指标和技术进步,应该会随着时间的推移降低 PCCRC 率。我们评估了作为衡量结肠镜检查质量变化的指标的人群中 PCCRC 的发生率随时间的变化趋势。

方法

我们对 1996 年至 2010 年间在加拿大安大略省接受完全结肠镜检查的 50 至 74 岁无结直肠癌高危因素的人群进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。我们将 PCCRC 率定义为结肠镜检查后 36 个月内诊断为 CRC 的个体中患有 PCCRC 的比例。我们根据 3 个时期(1996-2001 年、2001-2006 年和 2006-2010 年)比较了随时间变化的年龄和性别调整后的 PCCRC 率,并通过多变量回归评估了时期与所有 PCCRC、近端 PCCRC 和远端 PCCRC 的 PCCRC 风险之间的独立关联。

结果

在研究期间,结肠镜检查数量显著增加,尤其是在年轻人群和非医院环境中。在 1093658 名合格人群中,15 年研究期间,PCCRC 率保持在 8%左右。与 1996 年至 2001 年期间相比,2006 年至 2010 年期间 PCCRC、远端 PCCRC 和近端 PCCRC 的调整后比值比(95%置信区间[CI],1.0-1.31)分别为 1.14(95%CI,0.91-1.34)、1.11(95%CI,0.91-1.34)和 1.14(95%CI,0.94-1.38)。调整协变量后,PCCRC 风险的时间趋势不因内镜医师专业或医疗机构设置而异。

结论

安大略省的 PCCRC 率随时间保持稳定居高不下。需要采取广泛的举措来提高结肠镜检查质量。

相似文献

1
Temporal trends in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates in 50- to 74-year-old persons: a population-based study.50 岁至 74 岁人群结肠镜检查后结直肠癌发病率的时间趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1324-1334.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
2
Temporal Trends and Risk Factors for Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的时间趋势和危险因素。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;53(8):e334-e340. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001099.
3
Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Sweden From 2003 to 2012: Survival, Tumor Characteristics, and Risk Factors.2003年至2012年瑞典结肠镜检查后结直肠癌:生存率、肿瘤特征及危险因素
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;18(12):2724-2733.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.临床显著锯齿状息肉检出率及结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌风险:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):310-317. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Factors associated with colorectal cancer occurrence after colonoscopy that did not diagnose colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查未诊断出结直肠癌但与之相关的结直肠癌发生因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84(2):287-295.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.基于粪便免疫化学试验的筛查中腺瘤检出率和结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的间隔期风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Oct;175(10):1366-1373. doi: 10.7326/M22-0301. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
7
Causes of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis.基于世界内镜组织分析系统的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌病因。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr;158(5):1287-1299.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.031. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
8
Rates and characteristics of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer in the Swedish IBD population: what are the differences from a non-IBD population?瑞典 IBD 人群结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌发生率和特征:与非 IBD 人群相比有何不同?
Gut. 2019 Sep;68(9):1588-1596. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316651. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Quality of Colonoscopy Is Associated With Adenoma Detection and Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome.结肠镜检查质量与林奇综合征患者腺瘤检出率和结肠镜检查后结直肠癌预防相关。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;20(3):611-621.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers identified by probabilistic and deterministic linkage: results in an Australian prospective cohort.基于概率和确定性关联的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌:澳大利亚前瞻性队列研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 21;9(6):e026138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026138.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology.内镜检查单位认证指南:来自韩国结直肠外科学会的质量指标
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Mar;100(3):154-165. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Association Between Age and Complications After Outpatient Colonoscopy.门诊结肠镜检查后年龄与并发症的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208958. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8958.
3
Impact of a Citywide Benchmarking Intervention on Colonoscopy Quality Performance.
全市范围内基准干预对结肠镜检查质量表现的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Sep;65(9):2534-2541. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06067-y. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
4
Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National Health Service: population based cohort study.英国国家医疗服务体系中结肠镜检查提供者之间结直肠癌的术后差异:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 13;367:l6090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6090.
5
Recent advances in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的最新进展
F1000Res. 2019 Jul 9;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18503.1. eCollection 2019.
6
Validation of 5 key colonoscopy-related data elements from Ontario health administrative databases compared to the clinical record: a cross-sectional study.安大略省卫生行政数据库中5个与结肠镜检查相关的关键数据元素与临床记录的验证:一项横断面研究。
CMAJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;6(3):E330-E338. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180013. Print 2018 Jul-Sep.