• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜检查单位认证指南:来自韩国结直肠外科学会的质量指标

Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology.

作者信息

Shin Rumi, Lee Seongdae, Han Kyung-Su, Sohn Dae Kyung, Moon Sang Hui, Choi Dong Hyun, Kye Bong-Hyeon, Son Hae-Jung, Lee Sun Il, Si Sumin, Kang Won-Kyung

机构信息

The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Mar;100(3):154-165. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154
PMID:33748029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7943281/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Colonoscopy is an effective method of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), and it can prevent CRC by detection and removal of precancerous lesions. The most important considerations when performing colonoscopy screening are the safety and satisfaction of the patient and the diagnostic accuracy. Accordingly, the Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP) herein proposes an optimal level of standard performance to be used in endoscopy units and by individual colonoscopists for screening colonoscopy. These guidelines establish specific criteria for assessment of safety and quality in screening colonoscopy.

METHODS

The Colonoscopy Committee of the KSCP commissioned this Position Statement. Expert gastrointestinal surgeons representing the KSCP reviewed the published evidence to identify acceptable quality indicators and indicators that lacked sufficient evidence.

RESULTS

The KSCP recommends an optimal standard list for quality control of screening colonoscopy in the following 6 categories: training and competency of the colonoscopist, procedural quality, facilities and equipment, performance indicators and auditable outcomes, disinfection of equipment, and sedation and recovery of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The KSCP recommends that endoscopy units performing CRC screening evaluate 6 key performance measures during daily practice.

摘要

目的

结肠镜检查是筛查结直肠癌(CRC)的有效方法,它可通过检测和切除癌前病变来预防CRC。进行结肠镜检查筛查时最重要的考虑因素是患者的安全性和满意度以及诊断准确性。因此,韩国结直肠外科学会(KSCP)在此提出在内镜检查科室及由个体结肠镜检查医师用于筛查结肠镜检查的最佳标准执行水平。这些指南确立了筛查结肠镜检查安全性和质量评估的具体标准。

方法

KSCP的结肠镜检查委员会委托撰写本立场声明。代表KSCP的专家胃肠外科医生查阅已发表的证据,以确定可接受的质量指标和缺乏充分证据的指标。

结果

KSCP在以下6个类别中推荐了筛查结肠镜检查质量控制的最佳标准清单:结肠镜检查医师的培训与能力、操作质量、设施与设备、性能指标和可审计结果、设备消毒以及患者的镇静与恢复。

结论

KSCP建议进行CRC筛查的内镜检查科室在日常实践中评估6项关键性能指标。

相似文献

1
Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology.内镜检查单位认证指南:来自韩国结直肠外科学会的质量指标
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Mar;100(3):154-165. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.筛查结肠镜检查的质量指标、结肠镜检查医师的表现及随后发生间隔期结直肠癌的风险:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927.
3
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
4
Accrediting for screening-related colonoscopy services: What is required of the endoscopist and of the endoscopy service?结肠镜筛查相关服务的认证:对内镜医师和内镜检查服务有哪些要求?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun;30(3):487-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies.结肠镜检查医生的表现与腺瘤切除后的结直肠癌风险分层监测:两项全国性观察性研究。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Mar;160(4):1067-1074.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
6
Quality Indicators and Outcome Measures of Endoscopy in the National Cancer Screening Program.国家癌症筛查计划中内镜的质量指标和结果衡量。
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Nov;60(11):1054-1060. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1054.
7
8
The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.基于粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查项目中的结肠插管性能指标(PICI)
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1176-1181. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1648548. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Quality assurance of colonoscopy within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening program.荷兰国家结直肠癌筛查计划中结肠镜检查的质量保证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
10
[Colonoscopy quality control as a requirement of colorectal cancer screening].[结肠镜检查质量控制作为结直肠癌筛查的一项要求]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;36(9):597-605. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Adenoma per polypectomy as a training metric in colonoscopy: a retrospective analysis of trainee progression compared to expert performance.结肠镜检查中息肉切除术后腺瘤作为培训指标:与专家表现相比的实习生进展回顾性分析
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Aug;109(2):113-119. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.109.2.113. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Optimal withdrawal time in initial surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery: comparison between anterior/low anterior resection and right hemicolectomy.结直肠癌手术后初次监测结肠镜检查的最佳撤镜时间:前切除术/低位前切除术与右半结肠切除术的比较
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Oct;107(4):212-220. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.4.212. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea.韩国的国家结直肠癌筛查计划。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Dec;105(6):333-340. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.6.333. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse events associated with colonoscopy; an examination of online concerns.与结肠镜检查相关的不良事件;对网络关注问题的审视
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1127-5.
2
Achieving Competence in Endoscopy.在内镜检查方面达到胜任水平。
ACG Case Rep J. 2019 Aug 8;6(8):e00155. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000155. eCollection 2019 Aug.
3
Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National Health Service: population based cohort study.英国国家医疗服务体系中结肠镜检查提供者之间结直肠癌的术后差异:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 13;367:l6090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6090.
4
Association Between Polyp Detection Rate and Post-Colonoscopy Cancer Among Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Colonoscopy.接受诊断性结肠镜检查患者的息肉检出率与结肠镜检查后癌症之间的关联
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;19(1):202-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.016. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
5
Updates on the Facilities, Procedures, and Performance of the Accredited Endoscopy Unit.经认可的内镜检查科室的设施、程序及绩效更新
Clin Endosc. 2019 Sep;52(5):431-442. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.164. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients.肠道准备不充分的预测因素及结肠镜检查结果:28725例患者的10年经验
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):457-462. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0400. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
7
Guidelines for standardizing cleansing and disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes.胃肠道内镜清洗消毒规范指南。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Sep;31(5):477-497. doi: 10.1111/den.13474.
8
Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers identified by probabilistic and deterministic linkage: results in an Australian prospective cohort.基于概率和确定性关联的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌:澳大利亚前瞻性队列研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 21;9(6):e026138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026138.
9
Risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Denmark: time trends and comparison with Sweden and the English National Health Service.丹麦结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌风险:时间趋势及与瑞典和英国国家医疗服务体系的比较。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):733-741. doi: 10.1055/a-0919-4803. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
10
Epidemiology, characteristics, and survival of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in Asia: A population-based study.亚洲结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的流行病学、特征和生存情况:一项基于人群的研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;34(9):1545-1553. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14674. Epub 2019 May 15.