• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2003年至2012年瑞典结肠镜检查后结直肠癌:生存率、肿瘤特征及危险因素

Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Sweden From 2003 to 2012: Survival, Tumor Characteristics, and Risk Factors.

作者信息

Forsberg Anna, Widman Linnea, Bottai Matteo, Ekbom Anders, Hultcrantz Rolf

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (MedS), Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;18(12):2724-2733.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.010
PMID:32553903
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The rate of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) is a measure of colonoscopy quality, but there are conflicting results from studies of survival times of patients with PCCRC. We assessed survival times of patients with PCCRC and characterized the microscopic and macroscopic features of postcolonoscopy colorectal tumors.

METHODS

We performed a population-based cohort study using data from a database in Sweden, on 458,937 colonoscopies (54.0% women) performed from 2003 through 2012. Rates of colorectal cancer within 3 years of a colonoscopy were calculated based on the World Endoscopy Organization guidelines. Risk factors were evaluated using Poisson regression analysis. We used Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analyses, stratified by sex, to assess conditional survival. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate features of postcolonoscopy colorectal tumors, including stage location (right, left, or rectum) differentiation grade (high or low), synchronous tumors, perineural growth, resection margins, and mucinous and vessel characteristics.

RESULTS

Within 36 months after a colonoscopy, there were 19,184 individuals who had received a diagnosis of CRC; 1384 of these were PCCRCs (7.2%). The proportion of individuals with PCCRC decreased from 9.4% in 2003 to 6.1% in 2012. The largest risk factors for PCCRC were a prior diagnosis of CRC (relative risk [RR], 3.31; 95% CI, 2.71-4.04), ulcerative colitis (RR, 5.44; 95% CI, 4.75-6.23), Crohn's disease (RR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.98-4.87), and prior polypectomy (RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.97-2.72). Individuals with PCCRCs had shorter survival times than individuals with CRCs detected during the index colonoscopy. Multivariate hazard ratios for PCCRC were 2.75 for men (95% CI, 2.21-3.42) and 2.00 for women (95% CI, 1.59-2.52), respectively. Individuals with left-side PCCRC had shorter survival times than patients with CRC detected during the index colonoscopy. Postcolonoscopy colorectal tumors had increased odds of low differentiation grade (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.49) compared with colorectal tumors detected during the index colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of colonoscopies in Sweden, the rate of PCCRCs decreased from 9.4% in 2003 to 6.1% in 2012. Diseases that require surveillance (such as prior colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory bowel diseases) are the largest risk factors for PCCRC. Patients with PCCRC have shorter survival times than patients with CRC detected during their initial colonoscopy-especially women and patients with left-side tumors.

摘要

背景与目的

结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRC)发生率是衡量结肠镜检查质量的一项指标,但关于PCCRC患者生存时间的研究结果存在矛盾。我们评估了PCCRC患者的生存时间,并对结肠镜检查后结直肠肿瘤的微观和宏观特征进行了描述。

方法

我们利用瑞典一个数据库中的数据进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了2003年至2012年期间进行的458,937例结肠镜检查(女性占54.0%)。根据世界内镜组织指南计算结肠镜检查后3年内的结直肠癌发生率。使用泊松回归分析评估危险因素。我们使用Cox回归模型和Kaplan-Meier分析,并按性别分层,以评估条件生存情况。使用逻辑回归模型评估结肠镜检查后结直肠肿瘤的特征,包括分期部位(右半、左半或直肠)、分化程度(高或低)、同步肿瘤、神经周围生长、切缘以及黏液和血管特征。

结果

在结肠镜检查后的36个月内,有19,184人被诊断为结直肠癌;其中1384例为PCCRC(7.2%)。PCCRC患者的比例从2003年的9.4%降至2012年的6.1%。PCCRC的最大危险因素是先前诊断为结直肠癌(相对风险[RR],3.31;95%CI,2.71 - 4.04)、溃疡性结肠炎(RR,5.44;95%CI,4.75 - 6.23)、克罗恩病(RR,3.81;95%CI,2.98 - 4.87)以及先前的息肉切除术(RR,2.32;95%CI,1.97 - 2.72)。PCCRC患者的生存时间比在首次结肠镜检查时发现的结直肠癌患者短。PCCRC的多因素风险比男性为2.75(95%CI,2.21 - 3.42),女性为2.00(95%CI,1.59 - 2.52)。左侧PCCRC患者的生存时间比在首次结肠镜检查时发现的结直肠癌患者短。与在首次结肠镜检查时发现的结直肠肿瘤相比,结肠镜检查后结直肠肿瘤低分化程度的几率增加(优势比,1.27;95%CI,1.09 - 1.49)。

结论

在对瑞典结肠镜检查的分析中,PCCRC发生率从2003年的9.4%降至2012年的6.1%。需要进行监测的疾病(如先前的结直肠肿瘤和炎症性肠病)是PCCRC的最大危险因素。PCCRC患者的生存时间比在首次结肠镜检查时发现的结直肠癌患者短,尤其是女性和左侧肿瘤患者。

相似文献

1
Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Sweden From 2003 to 2012: Survival, Tumor Characteristics, and Risk Factors.2003年至2012年瑞典结肠镜检查后结直肠癌:生存率、肿瘤特征及危险因素
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;18(12):2724-2733.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
2
Rates and characteristics of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer in the Swedish IBD population: what are the differences from a non-IBD population?瑞典 IBD 人群结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌发生率和特征:与非 IBD 人群相比有何不同?
Gut. 2019 Sep;68(9):1588-1596. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316651. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
3
Causes of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis.基于世界内镜组织分析系统的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌病因。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr;158(5):1287-1299.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.031. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Characteristics and Survival of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancers.炎症性肠病和结肠镜检查后结直肠癌患者的特征和生存情况。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):e984-e1005. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.039. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Temporal trends in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates in 50- to 74-year-old persons: a population-based study.50 岁至 74 岁人群结肠镜检查后结直肠癌发病率的时间趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1324-1334.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
6
Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.基于粪便免疫化学试验的筛查中腺瘤检出率和结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的间隔期风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Oct;175(10):1366-1373. doi: 10.7326/M22-0301. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
7
Mortality After Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e236693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6693.
8
Quality of Colonoscopy Is Associated With Adenoma Detection and Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome.结肠镜检查质量与林奇综合征患者腺瘤检出率和结肠镜检查后结直肠癌预防相关。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;20(3):611-621.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
9
Temporal Trends and Risk Factors for Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的时间趋势和危险因素。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;53(8):e334-e340. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001099.
10
Factors associated with colorectal cancer occurrence after colonoscopy that did not diagnose colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查未诊断出结直肠癌但与之相关的结直肠癌发生因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84(2):287-295.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: What we need to know in the age of screening and magnifying endoscopy techniques.结肠镜检查后结直肠癌:在筛查和放大内镜技术时代我们需要了解的内容。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):107430. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107430.
2
Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation.结肠镜检查正式质量框架的成本与效益:经济评估
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Nov 18;12(11):E1334-E1341. doi: 10.1055/a-2444-6292. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Type 2 diabetes mellitus and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: clinical and molecular characteristics and survival.
2 型糖尿病与结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌:临床和分子特征与生存。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jul;35(7):1043-1052. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01861-9. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
4
Occurrence of Colorectal Cancer After a Negative Colonoscopy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.炎症性肠病患者阴性结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的发生:系统评价和荟萃分析。
In Vivo. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):523-530. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13470.
5
Incidence, characteristics, and predictive factors of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的发病率、特征及预测因素。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Apr;12(3):309-318. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12512. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in a national fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program.基于国家粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌筛查项目中的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌
Endoscopy. 2024 May;56(5):364-372. doi: 10.1055/a-2230-5563. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
7
Mortality After Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e236693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6693.
8
Validation of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) cases reported at national level following local root cause analysis: REFLECT study.在进行局部根本原因分析后,对国家层面报告的结肠镜检查后结直肠癌(PCCRC)病例进行验证:REFLECT研究。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 24;13(5):374-380. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-102016. eCollection 2022.
9
Colorectal cancer in elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease: a 1969-2017 Scandinavian register-based cohort study.老年发病炎症性肠病相关结直肠癌:1969-2017 年斯堪的纳维亚登记处基于队列的研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Oct;56(7):1168-1182. doi: 10.1111/apt.17175. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
10
Weakly Supervised Polyp Segmentation in Colonoscopy Images Using Deep Neural Networks.利用深度神经网络进行结肠镜检查图像的弱监督息肉分割
J Imaging. 2022 Apr 22;8(5):121. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8050121.