Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的时间趋势和危险因素。

Temporal Trends and Risk Factors for Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center.

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;53(8):e334-e340. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001099.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is effective for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention, yet patients may develop CRC despite adhering to screening/surveillance intervals. There are limited data on predictive factors associated with these postcolonoscopy CRCs (PCCRCs). We aimed to measure PCCRC rates and identify risk factors for PCCRC.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study, comparing patients with PCCRCs to spontaneous CRCs diagnosed during a 12.5-year period at an academic medical center. PCCRCs were defined as CRCs diagnosed in between guideline-recommended screening/surveillance intervals.

RESULTS

During the 12.5-year period, of 1266 CRCs diagnosed, 122 (10%) were PCCRCs. 70% of PCCRCs were diagnosed within 5 years of a prior colonoscopy. There was an increasing trend for PCCRC rates in recent years [odds ratio (OR), 2.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.51-5.09], with PCCRCs comprising 13.6% of cancers diagnosed in 2016 as compared with 5.7% of cancers diagnosed in 2005. Older age (OR per year, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04), proximal colonic location (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.20-3.33) and early stage (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.34-4.95) were associated with PCCRCs. In total, 41% of PCCRCs were diagnosed by a different physician from the physician who did the prior colonoscopy, and 42% of physicians did not diagnose any of their PCCRC cases.

CONCLUSIONS

PCCRC rates are rising in recent years, likely reflecting the widespread adoption of colonoscopy as a primary screening tool, and are more common in older patients and those with proximal, early-stage tumors. The finding that a large proportion of PCCRCs are diagnosed by a different physician raises the concern that physicians are unaware of their own patients' PCCRCs.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查可有效预防结直肠癌(CRC),但即使患者遵循筛查/监测间隔,仍可能发生 CRC。与这些结肠镜检查后 CRC(PCCRC)相关的预测因素数据有限。我们旨在测量 PCCRC 发生率并确定 PCCRC 的危险因素。

方法

我们进行了一项病例对照研究,将 PCCRC 患者与在学术医疗中心 12.5 年内诊断出的自发性 CRC 患者进行比较。PCCRC 定义为在指南推荐的筛查/监测间隔内诊断出的 CRC。

结果

在 12.5 年期间,在诊断出的 1266 例 CRC 中,有 122 例(10%)为 PCCRC。70%的 PCCRC 是在前一次结肠镜检查后 5 年内诊断出的。近年来,PCCRC 发生率呈上升趋势[比值比(OR),2.78;95%置信区间(CI),1.51-5.09],2016 年诊断出的 PCCRC 占癌症的 13.6%,而 2005 年诊断出的癌症占 5.7%。年龄较大(每年 OR,1.02;95%CI,1.01-1.04)、结肠近端位置(OR,1.99;95%CI,1.20-3.33)和早期阶段(OR,2.57;95%CI,1.34-4.95)与 PCCRC 相关。总共,41%的 PCCRC 是由与进行前一次结肠镜检查的医生不同的医生诊断的,而 42%的医生没有诊断出他们的任何 PCCRC 病例。

结论

近年来,PCCRC 发生率呈上升趋势,这可能反映了结肠镜检查作为主要筛查工具的广泛采用,并且在年龄较大的患者和具有近端、早期肿瘤的患者中更为常见。发现很大一部分 PCCRC 是由不同的医生诊断出来的,这引发了人们对医生不知道自己患者的 PCCRC 的担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验