Suppr超能文献

实施用于无菌技术的无菌非接触技术(ANTT®)临床实践框架:在伦敦两家医院采用混合方法进行的务实评估。

Implementing the Aseptic Non Touch Technique (ANTT®) clinical practice framework for aseptic technique: a pragmatic evaluation using a mixed methods approach in two London hospitals.

作者信息

Clare Simon, Rowley Stephen

机构信息

The Association for Safe Aseptic Practice, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

J Infect Prev. 2018 Jan;19(1):6-15. doi: 10.1177/1757177417720996. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aseptic technique is an important infection prevention competency for protecting patients from healthcare-associated infection (HAI). Healthcare providers using the Aseptic Non Touch Technique (ANTT®) aseptic technique have demonstrated reduced variability and improved compliance with aseptic technique.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study is to determine whether standardizing aseptic technique for invasive IV procedures, using the ANTT® - Clinical Practice Framework (CPF), increases staff compliance with the infection prevention actions designed to achieve a safe and effective aseptic technique, and whether this is sustainable over time.

METHODS

A pragmatic evaluation using a mixed-methods approach consisting of an observational audit of practice, a self-report survey and structured interviews with key stakeholders. Compliance with aseptic technique before and after the implementation of ANTT® was measured by observation of 49 registered healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

Mean compliance with competencies was 94%; each component of practice was improved over baseline: hand hygiene = 63% ( ≤ 0.001); glove use = 14% ( ≤ 0.037); Key-Part protection = 54% ( ≤ 0.001); a non-touch technique = 45% ( ≤ 0.001); Key-Part cleaning = 82% ( ≤ 0.001); and aseptic field management = 80% ( ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Results show implementation of ANTT® improved compliance with the prerequisite steps for safe and effective aseptic technique as defined by the ANTT®-CPF. Improvements in compliance were sustained over four years.

摘要

背景

无菌技术是一项重要的感染预防技能,可保护患者免受医疗相关感染(HAI)。采用无菌非接触技术(ANTT®)的医护人员在无菌技术操作上已表现出更低的变异性和更高的依从性。

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定使用ANTT®临床实践框架(CPF)对侵入性静脉输液操作的无菌技术进行标准化,是否能提高工作人员对旨在实现安全有效无菌技术的感染预防措施的依从性,以及这种依从性能否长期维持。

方法

采用务实的评估方法,综合运用混合方法,包括对实践的观察性审核、自我报告调查以及与关键利益相关者的结构化访谈。通过观察49名注册医护人员来衡量实施ANTT®前后的无菌技术依从性。

结果

能力平均依从率为94%;实践的每个组成部分均较基线有所改善:手部卫生 = 63%(≤0.001);手套使用 = 14%(≤0.037);关键部位保护 = 54%(≤0.001);非接触技术 = 45%(≤0.001);关键部位清洁 = 82%(≤0.001);无菌区域管理 = 80%(≤0.001)。

结论

结果表明,实施ANTT®提高了对ANTT®-CPF所定义的安全有效无菌技术前提步骤的依从性。依从性的提高在四年内得以维持。

相似文献

3
How widely has ANTT been adopted in NHS hospitals and community care organisations in England and Scotland?
Br J Nurs. 2020 Sep 10;29(16):924-932. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.16.924.
7
How to improve aseptic technique to reduce bloodstream infection during vascular access procedures.
Br J Nurs. 2022 Sep 22;31(17):880-885. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.17.880.
9
Is ANTT Achievable in the Home Healthcare Setting?
Home Healthc Now. 2022;40(2):92-99. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000001051.

引用本文的文献

1
[Interrupting the spread of germs : The art of emptying urinary drainage bags].
Urologie. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02644-z.
2
Ultrasound transducer disinfection for percutaneous procedures: A review of the evidence supporting guideline recommendations.
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Sep 30;27(4):242-250. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12408. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Plant-Derived Antimicrobials and Their Crucial Role in Combating Antimicrobial Resistance.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;13(8):746. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080746.
5
The 10-Point Plan 2021: Updated Concepts for Improved Procedural Safety During Facial Filler Treatments.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Jul 6;14:779-814. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S315711. eCollection 2021.
7
Consensus Guidelines on Opening Up of Aesthetic Practices in India During the COVID-19 Era.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020 Sep 9;13:661-669. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S267528. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Hand hygiene-related clinical trials reported since 2010: a systematic review.
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Apr;92(4):309-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
2
A point prevalence survey on hand hygiene, with a special focus on Candida species.
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jan 1;44(1):71-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.033. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
3
Aseptic non-touch technique and catheter-related bloodstream infection in children receiving parenteral nutrition at home.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2015 Aug;3(4):393-8. doi: 10.1177/2050640615576444.
6
Multiple reservoirs contribute to intraoperative bacterial transmission.
Anesth Analg. 2012 Jun;114(6):1236-48. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824970a2. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
7
"The dirty hand in the latex glove": a study of hand hygiene compliance when gloves are worn.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;32(12):1194-9. doi: 10.1086/662619. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
8
Performing an aseptic technique in a community setting: fact or fiction?
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2011 Jan;12(1):42-51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423610000198.
9
Hand contamination of anesthesia providers is an important risk factor for intraoperative bacterial transmission.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):98-105. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e7ce18. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
10
Variations in aseptic technique and implications for infection control.
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(1):26-31. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.1.32073.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验