1 Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
2 Motion in Brains Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Jun;32(6):752-765. doi: 10.1177/0269215517751587. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise protocol to inspiratory muscle training was more effective in improving maximum inspiratory pressure than inspiratory muscle training in isolation.
This is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
In total, 43 patients with asthma were included in this study.
The patients were allocated into one of the two groups: (1) inspiratory muscle training ( n = 21; 20-minute session) or (2) inspiratory muscle training (20-minute session) combined with a program of manual therapy (15-minute session) and therapeutic exercise (15-minute session; n = 22). All participants received 12 sessions, two days/week, for six weeks and performed the domiciliary exercises protocol.
The main measures such as maximum inspiratory pressure, spirometric measures, forward head posture, and thoracic kyphosis were recorded at baseline and after the treatment.
For the per-protocol analysis, between-group differences at post-intervention were observed in maximum inspiratory pressure (19.77 cmHO (11.49-28.04), P < .05; F = 22.436; P < .001; η = 0.371) and forward head posture (-1.25 cm (-2.32 to -0.19), P < .05; F = 5.662; P = .022; η = 0.13). The intention-to-treat analysis showed the same pattern of findings.
The inspiratory muscle training combined with a manual therapy and therapeutic exercise program is more effective than its application in isolation for producing short-term maximum inspiratory pressure and forward head posture improvements in patients with asthma.
本研究旨在评估与单独进行吸气肌训练相比,向吸气肌训练方案中加入手法治疗和运动疗法是否能更有效地提高最大吸气压力。
这是一项单盲、随机对照试验。
共有 43 例哮喘患者纳入本研究。
患者被分配到以下两组之一:(1)吸气肌训练组(n=21;20 分钟/次)或(2)吸气肌训练组(20 分钟/次)联合手法治疗(15 分钟/次)和运动疗法(15 分钟/次;n=22)。所有参与者均接受 12 次、每周 2 次、为期 6 周的治疗,并进行家庭运动方案。
主要观察指标包括最大吸气压力、肺功能指标、头部前倾姿势和胸椎后凸。这些指标在基线和治疗后进行记录。
在符合方案分析中,干预后组间差异在最大吸气压力方面有统计学意义(19.77cmH2O[11.49-28.04],P<.05;F=22.436;P<.001;η2=0.371)和头部前倾姿势方面有统计学意义(-1.25cm[-2.32 至-0.19],P<.05;F=5.662;P=.022;η2=0.13)。意向性治疗分析也显示了相同的发现模式。
与单独应用吸气肌训练相比,吸气肌训练联合手法治疗和运动疗法在短期内更能有效提高哮喘患者的最大吸气压力和头部前倾姿势。