Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Unit, D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):346-366. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12235. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
A visceral feeling of oneness with a group - identity fusion - has proven to be a stronger predictor of pro-group behaviours than other measures of group bonding, such as group identification. However, the relationship between identity fusion, other group alignment measures and their different roles in predicting pro-group behaviour is still controversial. Here, we test whether identity fusion is related to, but different from, unidimensional and multidimensional measures of group identification. We also show that identity fusion explains further variance of the endorsement of pro-group behaviour than these alternative measures and examine the structural and discriminant properties of identity fusion and group identification measures in three different contexts: nationality, religion, and football fandom. Finally, we extend the fusion literature to a new culture: Brazil. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first research explicitly addressing a comparison between these two forms of group alignment, identity fusion and identification with a group, and their role in predicting pro-group behaviours.
与群体产生一种发自内心的认同感——身份融合——已被证明是预测亲群体行为的一个比群体认同等其他群体联系衡量标准更强有力的指标。然而,身份融合、其他群体一致衡量标准及其在预测亲群体行为方面的不同作用之间的关系仍然存在争议。在这里,我们检验身份融合是否与群体认同的单一维度和多维衡量标准相关,但又有所不同。我们还表明,身份融合比这些替代衡量标准更能解释亲群体行为的认可的进一步差异,并在三个不同背景下检验身份融合和群体认同衡量标准的结构和区别特性:国籍、宗教和足球迷。最后,我们将融合文献扩展到一个新的文化:巴西。据我们所知,这是首次明确研究这两种群体联系形式——身份融合和对群体的认同——及其在预测亲群体行为方面的作用的比较。