May Philip C, Hsi Ryan S, Tran Henry, Stoller Marshall L, Chew Ben H, Chi Thomas, Usawachintachit Manint, Duty Brian D, Gore John L, Harper Jonathan D
1 Department of Urology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
2 Department of Urology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):309-314. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0657.
Nephrolithiasis is an increasingly common ailment in the United States. Ureteroscopic management has supplanted shockwave lithotripsy as the most common treatment of upper tract stone disease. Ureteral stricture is a rare but serious complication of stone disease and its management. The impact of new technologies and more widespread ureteroscopic management on stricture rates is unknown. We describe our experience in managing strictures incurred following ureteroscopy for upper tract stone disease.
Records for patients managed at four tertiary care centers between December 2006 and October 2015 with the diagnosis of ureteral stricture following ureteroscopy for upper tract stone disease were retrospectively reviewed. Study outcomes included number and type (endoscopic, reconstructive, or nephrectomy) of procedures required to manage stricture.
Thirty-eight patients with 40 ureteral strictures following URS for upper tract stone disease were identified. Thirty-five percent of patients had hydronephrosis or known stone impaction at the time of initial URS, and 20% of cases had known ureteral perforation at the time of initial URS. After stricture diagnosis, the mean number of procedures requiring sedation or general anesthesia performed for stricture management was 3.3 ± 1.8 (range 1-10). Eleven strictures (27.5%) were successfully managed with endoscopic techniques alone, 37.5% underwent reconstruction, 10% had a chronic stent/nephrostomy, and 10 (25%) required nephrectomy.
The surgical morbidity of ureteral strictures incurred following ureteroscopy for stone disease can be severe, with a low success rate of endoscopic management and a high procedural burden that may lead to nephrectomy. Further studies that assess specific technical risk factors for ureteral stricture following URS are needed.
肾结石在美国是一种日益常见的疾病。输尿管镜治疗已取代冲击波碎石术,成为上尿路结石疾病最常用的治疗方法。输尿管狭窄是结石疾病及其治疗中一种罕见但严重的并发症。新技术和更广泛的输尿管镜治疗对狭窄发生率的影响尚不清楚。我们描述了我们在处理上尿路结石疾病输尿管镜检查后发生的狭窄方面的经验。
回顾性分析2006年12月至2015年10月期间在四个三级医疗中心接受治疗的患者记录,这些患者因上尿路结石疾病接受输尿管镜检查后被诊断为输尿管狭窄。研究结果包括处理狭窄所需的手术数量和类型(内镜、重建或肾切除术)。
共确定了38例因上尿路结石疾病接受输尿管镜检查后出现40处输尿管狭窄的患者。35%的患者在初次输尿管镜检查时存在肾积水或已知结石嵌顿,20%的病例在初次输尿管镜检查时存在已知的输尿管穿孔。在狭窄诊断后,为处理狭窄而进行的需要镇静或全身麻醉的平均手术次数为3.3±1.8(范围1 - 10)。11处狭窄(27.5%)仅通过内镜技术成功处理,37.5%接受了重建手术,10%采用了长期支架/肾造瘘术,10例(25%)需要进行肾切除术。
输尿管镜检查治疗结石疾病后发生输尿管狭窄的手术并发症可能很严重,内镜治疗成功率低,手术负担重,可能导致肾切除术。需要进一步研究评估输尿管镜检查后输尿管狭窄的特定技术风险因素。