Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom;
Section of Developmental Affective Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 30;115(5):E1032-E1040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714691115. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Learning locations of danger within our environment is a vital adaptive ability whose neural bases are only partially understood. We examined fMRI brain activity while participants navigated a virtual environment in which flowers appeared and were "picked." Picking flowers in the danger zone (one-half of the environment) predicted an electric shock to the wrist (or "bee sting"); flowers in the safe zone never predicted shock; and household objects served as controls for neutral spatial memory. Participants demonstrated learning with shock expectancy ratings and skin conductance increases for flowers in the danger zone. Patterns of brain activity shifted between overlapping networks during different task stages. Learning about environmental threats, during flower approach in either zone, engaged the anterior hippocampus, amygdala, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), with vmPFC-hippocampal functional connectivity increasing with experience. Threat appraisal, during approach in the danger zone, engaged the insula and dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC), with insula-hippocampal functional connectivity. During imminent threat, after picking a flower, this pattern was supplemented by activity in periaqueductal gray (PAG), insula-dACC coupling, and posterior hippocampal activity that increased with experience. We interpret these patterns in terms of multiple representations of spatial context (anterior hippocampus); specific locations (posterior hippocampus); stimuli (amygdala); value (vmPFC); threat, both visceral (insula) and cognitive (dACC); and defensive behaviors (PAG), interacting in different combinations to perform the functions required at each task stage. Our findings illuminate how we learn about location-specific threats and suggest how they might break down into overgeneralization or hypervigilance in anxiety disorders.
学习我们环境中危险位置是一种至关重要的适应能力,但其神经基础仅部分被理解。我们在参与者在虚拟环境中导航时检查了 fMRI 大脑活动,在该环境中,花朵出现并“被采摘”。在危险区(环境的一半)采摘花朵预示着手腕会受到电击(或“蜜蜂蛰”);安全区的花朵从不预示电击;而家用物品则作为中性空间记忆的对照。参与者通过对危险区花朵的电击预期评分和皮肤电导率增加来展示学习。在不同任务阶段,大脑活动模式在重叠网络之间转移。在危险区或安全区接近花朵时,学习环境威胁会激活前海马体、杏仁核和腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC),vmPFC-海马体功能连接随着经验的增加而增加。在危险区接近时,威胁评估会激活脑岛和背侧前扣带皮层(dACC),同时脑岛-海马体功能连接。在即将面临威胁时,在采摘花朵后,这种模式通过中脑导水管周围灰质(PAG)、脑岛-dACC 耦合和后海马体活动的增加来补充,而后海马体活动随着经验的增加而增加。我们根据空间上下文的多个表示(前海马体);特定位置(后海马体);刺激(杏仁核);价值(vmPFC);威胁,包括内脏(脑岛)和认知(dACC);以及防御行为(PAG)来解释这些模式,它们在不同组合中相互作用,以执行每个任务阶段所需的功能。我们的发现阐明了我们如何学习特定位置的威胁,并提出了它们在焦虑障碍中如何分解为过度泛化或过度警惕的可能性。