Suppr超能文献

慢性牙周炎与侵袭性牙周炎的鉴别诊断及侵袭性牙周炎的分期:一项横断面研究。

Differential Diagnosis between Chronic versus Aggressive Periodontitis and Staging of Aggressive Periodontitis: A Cross-sectional Study.

作者信息

Ramachandra Srinivas Sulugodu, Gupta Vivek Vijay, Mehta Dhoom Singh, Gundavarapu Kalyan C, Luigi Nibali

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, Selangor, Malaysia.

Department of Periodontology, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):594-603. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_623_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differentiating between chronic periodontitis (CP) and aggressive periodontitis (AgP) is challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the variations in diagnosis between CP versus AgP and the staging of AgP based on the disease-staging index for AgP among periodontists, specialists in oral medicine, and general dental practitioners (GDPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen cases diagnosed as either CP or AgP were included in a "case document" and sent electronically to 75 respondents. Case document included a detailed history with periodontal charting, clinical features, images, and radiographs for all the cases. Diagnosis and staging for the case (if diagnosed as AgP) were requested. A reordered case document (cases in a different sequence) was again sent to respondents after a gap of 1 month.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics including frequency and percentage were calculated. Pearson's Chi-square test was used to analyze the data collected.

RESULTS

For the "case document," 10.17% of the responses were different from those of the authors for diagnosis, whereas 4.48% of the responses were different from those of the authors for the staging of AgP. The agreement in the overall responses was in the range of 0.69-0.84, which was considered good. Comparison of the responses for diagnosis showed statistically significant ( = 0.009) difference between specialists in oral medicine and GDPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Variations exist among respondents regarding the diagnosis of CP versus AgP. Staging of AgP based on the listed criteria showed low variations.

摘要

背景

区分慢性牙周炎(CP)和侵袭性牙周炎(AgP)具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估牙周病医生、口腔内科专家和普通牙科医生(GDPs)在CP与AgP诊断以及基于AgP疾病分期指数的AgP分期方面的差异。

材料与方法

将15例诊断为CP或AgP的病例纳入一份“病例文档”,并以电子方式发送给75名受访者。病例文档包括所有病例的详细病史、牙周检查表、临床特征、图像和X光片。要求对病例进行诊断和分期(如果诊断为AgP)。1个月后,将重新排序的病例文档(病例顺序不同)再次发送给受访者。

统计分析

计算包括频率和百分比在内的描述性统计数据。使用Pearson卡方检验分析收集到的数据。

结果

对于“病例文档”,10.17%的诊断回复与作者不同,而4.48%的AgP分期回复与作者不同。总体回复的一致性在0.69 - 0.84之间,被认为良好。诊断回复的比较显示,口腔内科专家和GDPs之间存在统计学显著差异( = 0.009)。

结论

受访者在CP与AgP的诊断方面存在差异。基于所列标准的AgP分期显示差异较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/5754981/b24d6b73507d/CCD-8-594-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验