Centre for Orofacial Regeneration, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (COR3), School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Microbiologyopen. 2023 Aug;12(4):e1377. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1377.
Oral biofilms are three-dimensional (3D) complex entities initiating dental diseases and have been evaluated extensively in the scientific literature using several biofilm models and assessment techniques. The list of biofilm models and assessment techniques may overwhelm a novice biofilm researcher. This narrative review aims to summarize the existing literature on biofilm models and assessment techniques, providing additional information on selecting an appropriate model and corresponding assessment techniques, which may be useful as a guide to the beginner biofilm investigator and as a refresher to experienced researchers. The review addresses previously established 2D models, outlining their advantages and limitations based on the growth environment, availability of nutrients, and the number of bacterial species, while also exploring novel 3D biofilm models. The growth of biofilms on clinically relevant 3D models, particularly melt electrowritten fibrous scaffolds, is discussed with a specific focus that has not been previously reported. Relevant studies on validated oral microcosm models that have recently gaining prominence are summarized. The review analyses the advantages and limitations of biofilm assessment methods, including colony forming unit culture, crystal violet, 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt assays, confocal microscopy, fluorescence in situ hybridization, scanning electron microscopy, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing. The use of more complex models with advanced assessment methodologies, subject to the availability of equipment/facilities, may help in developing clinically relevant biofilms and answering appropriate research questions.
口腔生物膜是三维(3D)复杂实体,引发了牙科疾病,并在科学文献中使用多种生物膜模型和评估技术进行了广泛评估。生物膜模型和评估技术的列表可能会让新手生物膜研究人员不知所措。本叙述性综述旨在总结现有的生物膜模型和评估技术文献,提供有关选择适当模型和相应评估技术的更多信息,这可能对新手生物膜研究人员有用,并为有经验的研究人员提供参考。该综述介绍了先前建立的 2D 模型,根据生长环境、营养物质的可用性和细菌种类的数量,概述了它们的优缺点,同时还探讨了新型 3D 生物膜模型。讨论了临床上相关的 3D 模型(特别是熔融静电纺丝纤维支架)上生物膜的生长情况,其中特别关注了以前未报道过的方面。总结了最近备受关注的经验证的口腔微环境模型的相关研究。该综述分析了生物膜评估方法的优缺点,包括菌落形成单位培养、结晶紫、2,3-双(2-甲氧基-4-硝基-5-磺苯基)-2H-四唑-5-羧基苯胺内盐测定法、共聚焦显微镜、荧光原位杂交、扫描电子显微镜、定量聚合酶链反应和下一代测序。在可用设备/设施的情况下,使用更复杂的模型和先进的评估方法,可能有助于开发临床上相关的生物膜并回答适当的研究问题。