Suppr超能文献

骶髂关节特定临床检查的测试者间信度。

Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint.

作者信息

Potter N A, Rothstein J M

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1985 Nov;65(11):1671-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.11.1671.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the intertester reliability of 13 tests for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction. Eight therapists examined 17 patients in two clinical settings. In each case, two therapists independently examined the patients and obtained results on all 13 of the SIJ tests. Patients with lumbosacral pain and unilateral lower extremity symptoms of a duration less than one year were examined. All the therapists had specialized in orthopedic physical therapy and had been trained in SIJ examination. Reliability was poor; 11 of the 13 tests resulted in less than 70% agreement. The two tests that relied solely on subjective patient response and imparted no information on SIJ position or mobility were within a range of 70% to 90% agreement. Our findings suggest the necessity of reviewing examination methods for the SIJ and improving reliability of clinical testing of this joint.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验针对骶髂关节(SIJ)功能障碍的13项测试的测试者间信度。8名治疗师在两种临床环境中对17名患者进行了检查。在每种情况下,两名治疗师独立检查患者,并获得了所有13项骶髂关节测试的结果。对患有腰骶部疼痛且单侧下肢症状持续时间少于一年的患者进行了检查。所有治疗师均专门从事骨科物理治疗,并接受过骶髂关节检查培训。信度较差;13项测试中有11项的一致性低于70%。仅依赖患者主观反应且未提供有关骶髂关节位置或活动度信息的两项测试的一致性在70%至90%之间。我们的研究结果表明,有必要重新审视骶髂关节的检查方法,并提高该关节临床测试的信度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验