University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
ISME J. 2018 Mar;12(3):849-859. doi: 10.1038/s41396-017-0016-6. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Microbial cooperation drives ecological and epidemiological processes and is affected by the ecology and demography of populations. Population density influences the selection for cooperation, with spatial structure and the type of social dilemma, namely public-goods production or self-restraint, shaping the outcome. While existing theories predict that in spatially structured environments increasing population density can select either for or against cooperation, experimental studies with both public-goods production and self-restraint systems have only ever shown that increasing population density favours cheats. We suggest that the disparity between theory and empirical studies results from experimental procedures not capturing environmental conditions predicted by existing theories to influence the outcome. Our study resolves this issue and provides the first experimental evidence that high population density can favour cooperation in spatially structured environments for both self-restraint and public-goods production systems. Moreover, using a multi-trait mathematical model supported by laboratory experiments we extend this result to systems where the self-restraint and public-goods social dilemmas interact. We thus provide a systematic understanding of how the strength of interaction between the two social dilemmas and the degree of spatial structure within an environment affect selection for cooperation. These findings help to close the current gap between theory and experiments.
微生物合作推动了生态和流行病学过程,并受到种群生态和人口统计学的影响。种群密度影响合作的选择,空间结构和社会困境的类型,即公共物品生产或自我约束,决定了结果。虽然现有理论预测,在空间结构的环境中,增加种群密度可以选择促进或抑制合作,但具有公共物品生产和自我约束系统的实验研究仅表明,增加种群密度有利于骗子。我们认为,理论与实证研究之间的差异源于实验程序无法捕捉到现有理论预测的影响结果的环境条件。我们的研究解决了这个问题,并提供了第一个实验证据,表明在空间结构的环境中,高种群密度可以促进自我约束和公共物品生产系统的合作。此外,我们使用实验室实验支持的多特征数学模型将这一结果扩展到自我约束和公共物品社会困境相互作用的系统中。因此,我们系统地了解了两个社会困境之间的相互作用强度以及环境内部的空间结构程度如何影响合作的选择。这些发现有助于缩小理论与实验之间的当前差距。