Falzon Laura C, Lechner Isabel, Chantziaras Ilias, Collineau Lucie, Courcoul Aurélie, Filippitzi Maria-Eleni, Laukkanen-Ninios Riikka, Peroz Carole, Pinto Ferreira Jorge, Postma Merel, Prestmo Pia G, Phythian Clare J, Sarno Eleonora, Vanantwerpen Gerty, Vergne Timothée, Grindlay Douglas J C, Brennan Marnie L
Veterinary Public Health Institute, University of Bern, Schwarzenburgstrasse 155, 3097, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.
Ecohealth. 2018 Mar;15(1):209-227. doi: 10.1007/s10393-017-1310-5. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Having gained momentum in the last decade, the One Health initiative promotes a holistic approach to address complex global health issues. Before recommending its adoption to stakeholders, however, it is paramount to first compile quantitative evidence of the benefit of such an approach. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize primary research that describes monetary and non-monetary outcomes following adoption of a One Health approach. An extensive literature search yielded a total of 42,167 references, of which 85 were included in the final analysis. The top two biotic health issues addressed in these studies were rabies and malaria; the top abiotic health issue was air pollution. Most studies described collaborations between human and animal (n = 42), or human and environmental disciplines (n = 41); commonly reported interventions included vector control and animal vaccination. Monetary outcomes were commonly expressed as cost-benefit or cost-utility ratios; non-monetary outcomes were described using disease frequency or disease burden measurements. The majority of the studies reported positive or partially positive outcomes. This paper illustrates the variety of health challenges that can be addressed using a One Health approach, and provides tangible quantitative measures that can be used to evaluate future implementations of the One Health approach.
“同一健康”倡议在过去十年中发展势头迅猛,它倡导采用整体方法来应对复杂的全球健康问题。然而,在向利益相关者推荐采用该倡议之前,首先汇编这种方法益处的定量证据至关重要。本范围综述的目的是识别和总结描述采用“同一健康”方法后货币和非货币结果的原始研究。广泛的文献检索共获得42167条参考文献,其中85条纳入最终分析。这些研究中涉及的前两大生物健康问题是狂犬病和疟疾;首要的非生物健康问题是空气污染。大多数研究描述了人类与动物(n = 42)或人类与环境学科(n = 41)之间的合作;常见的报告干预措施包括病媒控制和动物疫苗接种。货币结果通常表示为成本效益或成本效用比;非货币结果使用疾病频率或疾病负担测量来描述。大多数研究报告了积极或部分积极的结果。本文阐述了使用“同一健康”方法可以应对的各种健康挑战,并提供了可用于评估“同一健康”方法未来实施情况的切实定量措施。