Suppr超能文献

一种从主位视角出发的混合方法,用于界定和衡量低收入黑人家庭中的积极育儿方式。

An Emic, Mixed Methods Approach to Defining and Measuring Positive Parenting Among Low-Income, Black Families.

作者信息

McWayne Christine, Mattis Jacqueline S, Wright Linnie E Green, Limlingan Maria Cristina, Harris Elise

机构信息

Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development, Tufts University.

University of Michigan.

出版信息

Early Educ Dev. 2017;28(2):182-206. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2016.1208601. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

Abstract

RESEARCH FINDINGS

This within-group exploratory sequential mixed methods investigation sought to identify how ethnically diverse, urban-residing, low-income Black families conceptualize positive parenting. During the item development phase 119 primary caregivers from Head Start programs participated in focus groups and interviews. These qualitative data were content analyzed using a three-stage iterative process that resulted in the development of a final set of 72 items for a paper-and-pencil measure. In the measure validation phase of the study initial construct validity of the 72-item measure was assessed with an independent sample of 665 respondents. Common factor analyses revealed five dimensions of positive parenting on the (BPSC) scale that related in expected ways with other parent self-report measures.

PRACTICE AND POLICY

BPSC dimensions provide initial support for a more nuanced operationalization of positive parenting than currently exists in any single scale for use with this group, and hold promise for better honoring the culture- and context-specific parenting goals and practices that low-income, Black parents subjectively view as important for producing healthy developmental outcomes for their children.

摘要

研究结果

这项组内探索性序列混合方法调查旨在确定种族多样、居住在城市的低收入黑人家庭如何理解积极育儿。在项目开发阶段,来自“启智计划”项目的119名主要照料者参与了焦点小组和访谈。这些定性数据通过一个三阶段迭代过程进行内容分析,最终形成了一套72项纸笔测量的最终项目集。在研究的测量验证阶段,对665名独立受访者组成的样本评估了72项测量的初始结构效度。共同因素分析揭示了黑人积极育儿量表(BPSC)上积极育儿的五个维度,这些维度与其他父母自我报告测量以预期方式相关。

实践与政策

BPSC维度为积极育儿提供了初步支持,相较于目前用于该群体的任何单一量表,它能更细致地对积极育儿进行操作化,有望更好地尊重低收入黑人父母主观认为对孩子健康发展结果很重要的特定文化和背景下的育儿目标及做法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
The Promise of Prevention Science for Addressing Intergenerational Poverty.预防科学在解决代际贫困问题上的前景。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2018 Feb;24(1):128-143. doi: 10.1037/law0000138. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

3
A Comparison of Pattern Matching Indices.模式匹配指标的比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Apr 1;26(2):323-43. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2602_7.
4
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
6
Examining Parenting in the Neighborhood Context: A Review.审视邻里环境中的育儿方式:一项综述
J Child Fam Stud. 2015 Jan;24(1):195-219. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9826-y.
8
Positive parenting.积极育儿法
Nurs Forum. 2014 Jul-Sep;49(3):200-8. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12093. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
9
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.实现混合方法设计的整合——原则与实践。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
10
Excavating Culture: Summary of Results.挖掘文化:研究结果总结
Appl Dev Sci. 2008 Oct 1;12(4):220-226. doi: 10.1080/10888690802388169.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验