• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Emic, Mixed Methods Approach to Defining and Measuring Positive Parenting Among Low-Income, Black Families.一种从主位视角出发的混合方法,用于界定和衡量低收入黑人家庭中的积极育儿方式。
Early Educ Dev. 2017;28(2):182-206. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2016.1208601. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
2
Profiles of culturally salient positive parenting practices among urban-residing Black Head Start families.城市居住的黑人“先普林斯计划”家庭中具有文化特色的积极养育实践的特征。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2018 Jul;24(3):414-428. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000164. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
and Initial Validation of Mi Niño: A Tool to Measure Food-Related Parenting Practices of Spanish-Speaking Parents with Young Children.以及《我的孩子》初步验证:一种测量讲西班牙语的幼儿家长与食物相关育儿行为的工具。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2022 Dec 22;7(2):100002. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2022.100002. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
5
Encouraging Parenting Behaviors That Promote Early Childhood Development Among Caregivers From Low-Income Urban Communities: A Randomized Static Group Comparison Trial of a Primary Care-Based Parenting Program.鼓励低收入城市社区照顾者培养促进幼儿发展的育儿行为:一项基于初级保健的育儿项目的随机静态组比较试验
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Jan;23(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2589-8.
6
Parental feeding practices in Mexican American families: initial test of an expanded measure.墨西哥裔美国家庭的父母喂养方式:扩展测量的初步测试。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Jan 17;10:6. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-6.
7
Calibration of the food parenting practice (FPP) item bank: tools for improving the measurement of food parenting practices of parents of 5-12-year-old children.食品养育实践(FPP)项目库的校准:改进 5-12 岁儿童父母食品养育实践测量的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 16;17(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01049-9.
8
Development and preliminary validation of the Parenting around SNAcking Questionnaire (P-SNAQ).养育与进食行为问卷(P-SNAQ)的编制及初步验证。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Bringing Out the Best in Parenting: Translating Community-Engaged Research on Adversity and Parenting to Policy.发挥育儿的最佳效果:将关于逆境与育儿的社区参与研究转化为政策
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(3):271-284. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0031.
10
Identification of positive parenting practices among parents of young children living in low-income and racially, ethnically, and culturally diverse households.识别生活在低收入家庭以及不同种族、民族和文化背景家庭中的幼儿的父母的积极养育实践。
Appetite. 2022 Nov 1;178:106281. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106281. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of Maternal-Child Interactions and their Association with Children's External Resilience Resources.母婴互动概况及其与儿童外部复原力资源的关联
J Child Fam Stud. 2024 Sep;33(9):3004-3019. doi: 10.1007/s10826-024-02881-4. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
2
Social-ecological Protective and Risk Factors Associated with Depressive Symptoms among Black Adolescents.与黑人青少年抑郁症状相关的社会生态保护因素和风险因素。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Mar;53(3):317-329. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01266-x. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
3
Mother-child closeness and adolescent structural neural networks: a prospective longitudinal study of low-income families.母婴亲密关系与青少年结构性神经网络:一项针对低收入家庭的前瞻性纵向研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Nov 11;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae083.
4
Editorial: Positive youth development, mental health, and psychological well-being in diverse youth.社论:多元青年群体中的积极青年发展、心理健康与心理幸福感
Front Psychol. 2023 May 30;14:1152175. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152175. eCollection 2023.
5
Gene × Environment Interactions in the Development of Preschool Effortful Control, and Its Implications for Childhood Externalizing Behavior.基因与环境在学龄前努力控制发展中的相互作用,及其对儿童外化行为的影响。
Behav Genet. 2021 Sep;51(5):448-462. doi: 10.1007/s10519-021-10073-9. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
Studying caregiver-infant co-regulation in dynamic, diverse cultural contexts: A call to action.在动态、多元文化背景下研究照料者-婴儿的共同调节:行动呼吁。
Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Aug;64:101586. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101586. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
7
The Promise of Prevention Science for Addressing Intergenerational Poverty.预防科学在解决代际贫困问题上的前景。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2018 Feb;24(1):128-143. doi: 10.1037/law0000138. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Profiles of Racial Socialization Among African American Parents: Correlates, Context, and Outcome.非裔美国父母的种族社会化概况:关联因素、背景与结果
J Child Fam Stud. 2011 Aug;20(4):491-502. doi: 10.1007/s10826-010-9416-1. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
2
Supportive parenting, Ecological Context, and Children's Adjustment: A seven-Year Longitudianl Study.支持性养育、生态环境与儿童适应:一项为期七年的纵向研究。
Child Dev. 1997 Oct;68(5):908-923. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01970.x.
3
A Comparison of Pattern Matching Indices.模式匹配指标的比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Apr 1;26(2):323-43. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2602_7.
4
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
5
Pathways to Pain: Racial Discrimination and Relations Between Parental Functioning and Child Psychosocial Well-Being.疼痛的途径:种族歧视以及父母功能与儿童心理社会幸福感之间的关系。
J Black Psychol. 2015 Dec 1;41(6):491-512. doi: 10.1177/0095798414548511. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
6
Examining Parenting in the Neighborhood Context: A Review.审视邻里环境中的育儿方式:一项综述
J Child Fam Stud. 2015 Jan;24(1):195-219. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9826-y.
7
Minority Parents' Perspectives on Racial Socialization and School Readiness in the Early Childhood Period.少数族裔父母对幼儿期种族社会化与入学准备的看法。
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Jul-Aug;15(4):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Positive parenting.积极育儿法
Nurs Forum. 2014 Jul-Sep;49(3):200-8. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12093. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
9
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.实现混合方法设计的整合——原则与实践。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
10
Excavating Culture: Summary of Results.挖掘文化:研究结果总结
Appl Dev Sci. 2008 Oct 1;12(4):220-226. doi: 10.1080/10888690802388169.

一种从主位视角出发的混合方法,用于界定和衡量低收入黑人家庭中的积极育儿方式。

An Emic, Mixed Methods Approach to Defining and Measuring Positive Parenting Among Low-Income, Black Families.

作者信息

McWayne Christine, Mattis Jacqueline S, Wright Linnie E Green, Limlingan Maria Cristina, Harris Elise

机构信息

Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development, Tufts University.

University of Michigan.

出版信息

Early Educ Dev. 2017;28(2):182-206. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2016.1208601. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1080/10409289.2016.1208601
PMID:29333053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5766038/
Abstract

RESEARCH FINDINGS

This within-group exploratory sequential mixed methods investigation sought to identify how ethnically diverse, urban-residing, low-income Black families conceptualize positive parenting. During the item development phase 119 primary caregivers from Head Start programs participated in focus groups and interviews. These qualitative data were content analyzed using a three-stage iterative process that resulted in the development of a final set of 72 items for a paper-and-pencil measure. In the measure validation phase of the study initial construct validity of the 72-item measure was assessed with an independent sample of 665 respondents. Common factor analyses revealed five dimensions of positive parenting on the (BPSC) scale that related in expected ways with other parent self-report measures.

PRACTICE AND POLICY

BPSC dimensions provide initial support for a more nuanced operationalization of positive parenting than currently exists in any single scale for use with this group, and hold promise for better honoring the culture- and context-specific parenting goals and practices that low-income, Black parents subjectively view as important for producing healthy developmental outcomes for their children.

摘要

研究结果

这项组内探索性序列混合方法调查旨在确定种族多样、居住在城市的低收入黑人家庭如何理解积极育儿。在项目开发阶段,来自“启智计划”项目的119名主要照料者参与了焦点小组和访谈。这些定性数据通过一个三阶段迭代过程进行内容分析,最终形成了一套72项纸笔测量的最终项目集。在研究的测量验证阶段,对665名独立受访者组成的样本评估了72项测量的初始结构效度。共同因素分析揭示了黑人积极育儿量表(BPSC)上积极育儿的五个维度,这些维度与其他父母自我报告测量以预期方式相关。

实践与政策

BPSC维度为积极育儿提供了初步支持,相较于目前用于该群体的任何单一量表,它能更细致地对积极育儿进行操作化,有望更好地尊重低收入黑人父母主观认为对孩子健康发展结果很重要的特定文化和背景下的育儿目标及做法。