Suppr超能文献

英国神经放射科医生工作模式的安全性:我们能从航空业和认知科学中学到什么?

Safety of working patterns among UK neuroradiologists: what can we learn from the aviation industry and cognitive science?

作者信息

Reicher John, Currie Stuart, Birchall Daniel

机构信息

1 Department of Neuroradiology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.

2 Department of Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary , Leeds , UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2018 Apr;91(1084):20170284. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170284. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Abstract

As the volume and complexity of imaging in the UK continues to rise, there is pressure on radiologists to spend increasing lengths of time reporting to cope with the growing workload. However, there is limited guidance for radiologists about structuring the working day to strike the necessary balance between achieving satisfactory reporting volume and maintaining quality and safety. We surveyed 86 neuroradiologists (receiving 59 responses), regarding time spent reporting, frequency and duration of work breaks, and break activities. Our results demonstrate that some neuroradiologists report for up to 12 h a day and for 4 h before taking a break. Mean duration of breaks is less than 15 min and these often consist of computer screen-based or cognitively demanding tasks. Many areas of medicine have looked to the aviation industry to develop improvements in safety through regulated, standardised practices. There are parallels between the work of air traffic controllers (ATCs) and radiologists. We review the legislation that controls the working hours of UK ATCs to minimise fatigue-related errors, and its scientific basis. We also consider the vigilance decrement, a concept in cognitive science which describes the reduction in performance with increasing time-on-task. We conclude that, in comparison with ATCs, work patterns among radiologists are poorly standardised and potentially dangerous. Evidence suggests that placing limits on reporting time and minimum break duration, as well as ensuring appropriate break activities, can benefit reporting quality. It is imperative that radiologists and managers heed these lessons, to improve standards and protect patients from error.

摘要

随着英国影像检查的数量和复杂性持续增加,放射科医生面临着越来越大的压力,需要花费更长时间进行报告以应对不断增长的工作量。然而,关于如何安排工作日程,以便在完成令人满意的报告数量与保持质量和安全之间取得必要平衡,针对放射科医生的指导却很有限。我们对86名神经放射科医生进行了调查(收到59份回复),内容涉及报告所花费的时间、工作休息的频率和时长以及休息期间的活动。我们的结果表明,一些神经放射科医生每天报告长达12小时,且连续报告4小时才休息。休息的平均时长不到15分钟,而且这些休息通常包括基于电脑屏幕的任务或需要认知能力的任务。医学的许多领域都期望借鉴航空业的经验,通过规范、标准化的做法来提高安全性。空中交通管制员(ATC)的工作与放射科医生的工作存在相似之处。我们回顾了控制英国空中交通管制员工作时间以尽量减少与疲劳相关错误的立法及其科学依据。我们还考虑了警觉性下降这一认知科学概念,它描述了随着任务执行时间增加,表现会下降。我们得出结论,与空中交通管制员相比,放射科医生的工作模式标准化程度低且可能存在危险。有证据表明,限制报告时间和设定最短休息时长,以及确保适当的休息活动,有助于提高报告质量。放射科医生和管理人员必须吸取这些教训,以提高标准并保护患者免受错误影响。

相似文献

4
Working round-the-clock.昼夜不停地工作。
Occup Health Saf. 1999 Oct;68(10):201-7.
6
[Rest for safety: which stakes?].[为安全而休息:何种风险?]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):638-48. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 May 3.
9
Reexamining fatigue: implications for nursing practice.重新审视疲劳:对护理实践的启示。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009 Apr-Jun;32(2):112-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000348198.16788.df.
10
A Systematic Review of Fatigue in Radiology: Is It a Problem?放射科疲劳问题的系统评价:这是一个问题吗?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):799-806. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18613. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

10
Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement.警觉、警醒或持续注意力:生理基础与测量
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;117(9):1885-901. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验