Luna T D, French J, Mitcha J L
U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks AFB, TX 96266-5823, USA.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997 Jan;68(1):18-23.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shift-specific sleep, general activity levels, mood and cognitive performance of air traffic controllers (ATCs) working a forward 2-2-2 rapid rotation shift schedule.
ATCs are more fatigued on the night-shift.
ATCs recorded their sleep, oral temperature and subjective fatigue levels, took a computerized cognitive performance battery (n = 13) and completed the Profile of Mood States questionnaire (POMS) (n = 12). Actigraphs were used to objectively monitor general activity levels and score sleep and the restfullness of scored sleep (n = 9). Analyses were made on the basis of duty shift, post-shift, day of shift, and duty location.
There was significantly more actigraph scored sleep (85 min, p = 0.038), subjectively reported sleep (26 min, p = 0.009) and subjectively measured fatigue (p < 0.001) and confusion (p = 0.003) for the ATCs while they were on-duty on the night-shift. The night-shift was also associated with decreased vigor (p = 0.039) and general activity levels (p = 0.017). Significantly more sleep was reported (7.6 h, p = 0.01) and scored by actigraph (4.7 h, p = 0.02) following the swing-shift than following the day-shift. The radar approach ATCs reported greater confusion (p = 0.019) and less vigor (p = 0.002) than the tower ATCs. Insufficient trials were available for direct performance analysis.
ATCs on the night-shift of a forward rapid rotation shift schedule appear to be falling asleep and report increased confusion and fatigue. Further study is indicated.
本研究旨在评估空中交通管制员(ATC)采用向前2-2-2快速轮班时间表时特定班次的睡眠、总体活动水平、情绪和认知表现。
空中交通管制员在夜班时更疲劳。
空中交通管制员记录他们的睡眠、口腔温度和主观疲劳水平,进行一套计算机化认知表现测试(n = 13),并完成情绪状态剖面图问卷(POMS)(n = 12)。使用活动记录仪客观监测总体活动水平,并对睡眠及所记录睡眠的安稳程度进行评分(n = 9)。分析基于值班班次、班次后、轮班日和值班地点进行。
空中交通管制员在夜班值班时,活动记录仪记录的睡眠时间显著更长(85分钟,p = 0.038),主观报告的睡眠时间更长(26分钟,p = 0.009),主观测量的疲劳程度更高(p < 0.001)以及困惑程度更高(p = 0.003)。夜班还与活力下降(p = 0.039)和总体活动水平降低(p = 0.017)相关。与日班后相比,中班后报告的睡眠时间显著更长(7.6小时,p = 0.01),活动记录仪记录的睡眠时间也更长(4.7小时,p = 0.02)。与塔台空中交通管制员相比,雷达进近管制员报告的困惑程度更高(p = 0.019),活力更低(p = 0.002)。用于直接表现分析的试验不足。
采用向前快速轮班时间表的空中交通管制员在夜班时似乎会入睡,并报告困惑和疲劳增加。需要进一步研究。