Suppr超能文献

“放射状”社区研究的过程评估:一项旨在增加肾脏移植转诊的透析机构层面干预措施。

Process evaluation of the RaDIANT community study: a dialysis facility-level intervention to increase referral for kidney transplantation.

作者信息

Hamoda Reem E, Gander Jennifer C, McPherson Laura J, Arriola Kimberly J, Cobb Loren, Pastan Stephen O, Plantinga Laura, Browne Teri, Hartmann Erica, Mulloy Laura, Zayas Carlos, Krisher Jenna, Patzer Rachel E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine, 1629 Pierce Dr. NE, 30322, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jan 15;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0807-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Reducing Disparities in Access to kidNey Transplantation Community Study (RaDIANT) was an End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Network 6-developed, dialysis facility-level randomized trial testing the effectiveness of a 1-year multicomponent education and quality improvement intervention in increasing referral for kidney transplant evaluation among selected Georgia dialysis facilities.

METHODS

To assess implementation of the RaDIANT intervention, we conducted a process evaluation at the conclusion of the intervention period (January-December 2014). We administered a 20-item survey to the staff involved with transplant education in 67 dialysis facilities randomized to participate in intervention activities. Survey items assessed facility participation in the intervention (fidelity and reach), helpfulness and willingness to continue intervention activities (sustainability), suggestions for improving intervention components (sustainability), and factors that may have influenced participation and study outcomes (context). We defined high fidelity to the intervention as completing 11 or more activities, and high participation in an activity as having at least 75% participation across intervention facilities.

RESULTS

Staff from 65 of the 67 dialysis facilities completed the questionnaire, and more than half (50.8%) reported high adherence (fidelity) to RaDIANT intervention requirements. Nearly two-thirds (63.1%) of facilities reported that RaDIANT intervention activities were helpful or very helpful, with 90.8% of facilities willing to continue at least one intervention component beyond the study period. Intervention components with high participation emphasized staff and patient-level education, including in-service staff orientations, patient and family education programs, and patient educational materials. Suggested improvements for intervention activities emphasized addressing financial barriers to transplantation, with financial education materials perceived as most helpful among RaDIANT educational materials. Variation in facility-level fidelity of the RADIANT intervention did not significantly influence the mean difference in proportion of patients referred pre- (2013) and post-intervention (2014).

CONCLUSIONS

We found high fidelity to the RaDIANT multicomponent intervention at the majority of intervention facilities, with sustainability of select intervention components at intervention facilities and feasibility for dissemination across ESRD Networks. Future modification of the intervention should emphasize financial education regarding kidney transplantation and amend intervention components that facilities perceive as time-intensive or non-sustainable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT02092727 . Registered 13 Mar 2014 (retrospectively registered).

摘要

背景

减少肾移植可及性差异社区研究(RaDIANT)是一项由终末期肾病(ESRD)网络6发起、在透析机构层面开展的随机试验,旨在测试一项为期1年的多组分教育与质量改进干预措施在增加佐治亚州选定透析机构中肾移植评估转诊方面的有效性。

方法

为评估RaDIANT干预措施的实施情况,我们在干预期结束时(2014年1月至12月)进行了一项过程评估。我们向随机参与干预活动的67家透析机构中参与移植教育的工作人员发放了一份包含20个条目的调查问卷。调查项目评估了机构对干预措施的参与情况(保真度和覆盖范围)、干预活动的帮助程度及继续开展干预活动的意愿(可持续性)、对改进干预组分的建议(可持续性)以及可能影响参与情况和研究结果的因素(背景)。我们将对干预措施的高保真度定义为完成11项或更多活动,将一项活动的高参与度定义为各干预机构的参与率至少达到75%。

结果

67家透析机构中的65家机构的工作人员完成了问卷,超过半数(50.8%)的机构报告对RaDIANT干预要求的依从性(保真度)较高。近三分之二(63.1%)的机构报告称RaDIANT干预活动有帮助或非常有帮助,90.8%的机构愿意在研究期之后继续至少一项干预组分。参与度高的干预组分强调工作人员和患者层面的教育,包括在职员工培训、患者及家属教育项目以及患者教育材料。对干预活动的改进建议强调解决移植的经济障碍,在RaDIANT教育材料中,金融教育材料被认为最有帮助。RaDIANT干预措施在机构层面的保真度差异并未显著影响干预前(2013年)和干预后(2014年)转诊患者比例的平均差异。

结论

我们发现大多数干预机构对RaDIANT多组分干预措施的保真度较高,干预机构中部分干预组分具有可持续性,且在ESRD网络中具有推广的可行性。未来对干预措施的修改应强调肾移植的金融教育,并修改那些机构认为耗时或不可持续的干预组分。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov编号NCT02092727。于2014年3月13日注册(追溯注册)。

相似文献

4

引用本文的文献

2
Implementation of An Advance Care Planning Intervention in Dialysis Clinics.在透析诊所实施预先护理计划干预措施。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Jun;85(6):679-686. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.12.003. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
4
Implementation of the ASCENT Trial to Improve Transplant Waitlisting Access.实施ASCENT试验以改善移植等待名单的获取情况。
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Nov 2;9(2):225-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.10.028. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

2
The ESRD Quality Incentive Program-Can We Bridge the Chasm?终末期肾病质量激励计划——我们能弥合差距吗?
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun;28(6):1697-1706. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016101079. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验