Plantinga Laura C, Pastan Stephen O, Wilk Adam S, Krisher Jenna, Mulloy Laura, Gibney Eric M, Patzer Rachel E
Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Emory Transplant Center, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Feb;69(2):257-265. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.08.038. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
Dialysis facility performance measures to improve access to kidney transplantation are being considered. Referral of patients for kidney transplantation evaluation by the dialysis facility is one potential indicator, but limited data exist to evaluate whether referral is associated with existing dialysis facility quality indicators.
Cross-sectional study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 12,926 incident (July 2005 to September 2011) adult (aged 18-69 years) patients treated at 241 dialysis facilities with complete quality indicator information from US national registry data linked to transplantation referral data from all 3 Georgia kidney transplantation centers.
Facility performance on dialysis quality indicators (high, intermediate, and low tertiles).
Percentages of patients referred within 1 year of dialysis therapy initiation at dialysis facility.
Overall, a median of 25.4% of patients were referred for kidney transplantation within 1 year of dialysis therapy initiation. Higher facility-level referral was associated with better performance with respect to standardized transplantation ratio (high, 28.6%; intermediate, 25.1%; and low, 22.9%; P=0.001) and percentage waitlisted (high, 30.7%; intermediate, 26.8%; and low, 19.2%; P<0.001). Facility-level referral was not associated with indicators of quality of care associated with dialysis therapy initiation, including percentage of incident patients being informed of transplantation options. For most non-transplantation-related indicators of high-quality care, including those capturing mortality, morbidity, and anemia management, better performance was not associated with higher facility-level transplantation referral.
Potential ecologic fallacy and residual confounding.
Transplantation referral among patients at dialysis facilities does not appear to be associated with overall quality of dialysis care at the facility. Quality indicators related to kidney transplantation were positively associated with, but not entirely correspondent with, higher percentages of patients referred for kidney transplantation evaluation from dialysis facilities. These results suggest that facility-level referral, which is within the control of the dialysis facility, may provide information about the quality of dialysis care beyond current indicators.
正在考虑采用透析机构绩效指标来改善肾移植的可及性。由透析机构将患者转诊至肾移植评估是一个潜在指标,但用于评估转诊是否与现有透析机构质量指标相关的数据有限。
横断面研究。
2005年7月至2011年9月期间,在241家透析机构接受治疗的12926例成年(年龄18 - 69岁)新发病患者,其具备来自美国国家登记数据的完整质量指标信息,并与佐治亚州所有3个肾移植中心的移植转诊数据相关联。
透析质量指标方面的机构绩效(高、中、低三分位数)。
在透析机构开始透析治疗1年内被转诊进行肾移植的患者百分比。
总体而言,在透析治疗开始1年内,中位有25.4%的患者被转诊进行肾移植。更高的机构层面转诊率与标准化移植率方面的更好表现相关(高:28.6%;中:25.1%;低:22.9%;P = 0.001)以及列入等待名单的百分比相关(高:30.7%;中:26.8%;低:19.2%;P < 0.001)。机构层面转诊与透析治疗开始时的护理质量指标无关,包括新发病患者被告知移植选择的百分比。对于大多数与高质量护理相关的非移植相关指标,包括那些反映死亡率、发病率和贫血管理的指标,更好的表现与更高的机构层面移植转诊率无关。
潜在的生态学谬误和残余混杂。
透析机构患者中的移植转诊似乎与该机构的总体透析护理质量无关。与肾移植相关的质量指标与更高百分比的从透析机构转诊进行肾移植评估的患者呈正相关,但并非完全对应。这些结果表明,处于透析机构控制范围内的机构层面转诊可能提供超出当前指标的透析护理质量信息。