Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime, and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Mar;79:254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.029. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
In this study, we tried to quantify the isolated and modulated effects of topological design and material type on the mechanical properties of AM porous biomaterials. Towards this aim, we assembled a large dataset comprising the mechanical properties of AM porous biomaterials with different topological designs (i.e. different unit cell types and relative densities) and material types. Porous structures were additively manufactured from Co-Cr using a selective laser melting (SLM) machine and tested under quasi-static compression. The normalized mechanical properties obtained from those structures were compared with mechanical properties available from our previous studies for porous structures made from Ti-6Al-4V and pure titanium as well as with analytical solutions. The normalized values of elastic modulus and yield stress were found to be relatively close to each other as well as in agreement with analytical solutions regardless of material type. However, the material type was found to systematically affect the mechanical properties of AM porous biomaterials in general and the post-elastic/post-yield range (plateau stress and energy absorption capacity) in particular. To put this in perspective, topological design could cause up to 10-fold difference in the mechanical properties of AM porous biomaterials while up to 2-fold difference was observed as a consequence of changing the material type.
在这项研究中,我们试图量化拓扑设计和材料类型对增材制造(AM)多孔生物材料力学性能的单独和调节作用。为此,我们收集了一个包含不同拓扑设计(即不同单元类型和相对密度)和材料类型的 AM 多孔生物材料力学性能的大型数据集。使用选择性激光熔化(SLM)机器从 Co-Cr 中增材制造多孔结构,并在准静态压缩下进行测试。从这些结构中获得的归一化机械性能与我们之前使用 Ti-6Al-4V 和纯钛制造的多孔结构以及分析解获得的机械性能进行了比较。弹性模量和屈服应力的归一化值彼此之间相对接近,并且无论材料类型如何都与分析解一致。然而,材料类型被发现普遍影响 AM 多孔生物材料的力学性能,特别是在后弹性/后屈服阶段(平台应力和能量吸收能力)。为了说明这一点,拓扑设计可能导致 AM 多孔生物材料的力学性能差异高达 10 倍,而改变材料类型则导致差异高达 2 倍。