Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.
Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London.
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Mar;68(668):e157-e167. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X694397. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
Population factors, including social deprivation and morbidity, predict the use of emergency departments (EDs).
To link patient-level primary and secondary care data to determine whether the association between deprivation and ED attendance is explained by multimorbidity and other clinical factors in the GP record.
Retrospective cohort study based in East London.
Primary care demographic, consultation, diagnostic, and clinical data were linked with ED attendance data. GP Patient Survey (GPPS) access questions were linked to practices.
Adjusted multilevel analysis for adults showed a progressive rise in ED attendance with increasing numbers of long-term conditions (LTCs). Comparing two LTCs with no conditions, the odds ratio (OR) is 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.25 to 1.31); comparing four or more conditions with no conditions, the OR is 2.55 (95% CI = 2.44 to 2.66). Increasing annual GP consultations predicted ED attendance: comparing zero with more than two consultations, the OR is 2.44 (95% CI = 2.40 to 2.48). Smoking (OR 1.30, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.32), being housebound (OR 2.01, 95% CI = 1.86 to 2.18), and age also predicted attendance. Patient-reported access scores from the GPPS were not a significant predictor. For children, younger age, male sex, white ethnicity, and higher GP consultation rates predicted attendance.
Using patient-level data rather than practice-level data, the authors demonstrate that the burden of multimorbidity is the strongest clinical predictor of ED attendance, which is independently associated with social deprivation. Low use of the GP surgery is associated with low attendance at ED. Unlike other studies, the authors found that adult patient experience of GP access, reported at practice level, did not predict use.
人口因素,包括社会贫困和发病率,可预测急诊部门(ED)的使用。
将患者层面的初级和二级保健数据联系起来,以确定在全科医生记录中,是否可以用多种合并症和其他临床因素来解释贫困与 ED 就诊之间的关联。
基于东伦敦的回顾性队列研究。
将初级保健的人口统计学、咨询、诊断和临床数据与 ED 就诊数据联系起来。将全科医生患者调查(GPPS)的访问问题与实践联系起来。
对成年人进行的调整后的多水平分析显示,随着长期疾病(LTCs)数量的增加,ED 就诊率呈上升趋势。与无疾病相比,有两种 LTCs 的比值比(OR)为 1.28(95%置信区间[CI] = 1.25 至 1.31);与无疾病相比,有四种或更多疾病的 OR 为 2.55(95% CI = 2.44 至 2.66)。每年 GP 就诊次数的增加预示着 ED 的就诊:与零次就诊相比,就诊次数超过两次的 OR 为 2.44(95% CI = 2.40 至 2.48)。吸烟(OR 1.30,95% CI = 1.28 至 1.32)、行动不便(OR 2.01,95% CI = 1.86 至 2.18)和年龄也是就诊的预测因素。GPPS 中患者报告的就诊得分并不是一个显著的预测因素。对于儿童,年龄较小、男性、白种人以及更高的 GP 就诊率预示着就诊。
作者使用患者层面的数据而不是实践层面的数据,证明多种合并症的负担是 ED 就诊的最强临床预测因素,它与社会贫困状况独立相关。很少使用全科医生诊所与 ED 就诊率低有关。与其他研究不同,作者发现,患者在实践层面报告的全科医生就诊体验并不能预测就诊情况。