• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于医疗利用和慢性病共病的数据分析驱动的人群细分对未来医疗保健利用和死亡率的预测能力如何?

How predictive of future healthcare utilisation and mortality is data-driven population segmentation based on healthcare utilisation and chronic condition comorbidity?

机构信息

Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Ynysmeurig House, Navigation Park, Abercynon, CF45 4SN, UK.

Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):1621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19065-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-19065-w
PMID:38890659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11184761/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years data-driven population segmentation using cluster analyses of mainly health care utilisation data has been used as a proxy of future health care need. Chronic conditions patterns tended to be examined after segmentation but may be useful as a segmentation variable which, in combination with utilisation could indicate severity. These could further be of practical use to target specific clinical groups including for prevention. This study aimed to assess the ability of data-driven segmentation based on health care utilisation and comorbidities to predict future outcomes: Emergency admission, A&E attendance, GP practice contacts, and mortality.

METHODS

We analysed record-linked data for 412,997 patients registered with GP practices in 2018-19 in Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board (CTM UHB) area within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. We created 10 segments using k-means clustering based on utilisation (GP practice contacts, prescriptions, emergency and elective admissions, A&E and outpatients) and chronic condition counts for 2018 using different variable compositions to denote need. We assessed the characteristics of the segments. We employed a train/test scheme (80% training set) to compare logistic regression model predictions with observed outcomes on follow-up in 2019. We assessed the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for models with demographic variables, with and without the segments, as well as between segmentation implementations (with/without comorbidity and primary care data).

RESULTS

Adding the segments to the model with demographic covariates improved the prediction for all outcomes. For emergency admissions this increased discrimination from AUC 0.65 (CI 0.64-0.65) to 0.73 (CI 0.73-0.74). Models with the segments only performed nearly as well as the full models. Excluding comorbidity showed reduced predictive ability for mortality (similar otherwise) but most pronounced reduction when excluding all primary care variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This shows that the segments have satisfactory predictive ability, even for varied outcomes and a broad range of events and conditions used in the segmentation. It suggests that the segments can be a useful tool in helping to identify specific groups of need to target with anticipatory care. Identification may be refined with selected diagnoses or more specialised tools such as risk stratification.

摘要

背景

近年来,利用主要医疗保健利用数据的聚类分析进行数据驱动的人群细分已被用作未来医疗保健需求的替代指标。在细分后,慢性病模式往往会被检查,但作为细分变量可能很有用,与利用相结合,可以表明严重程度。这些对于针对特定临床群体(包括预防)具有实际意义。本研究旨在评估基于医疗保健利用和合并症的数据驱动细分来预测未来结果的能力:急诊入院、急症就诊、全科医生就诊次数和死亡率。

方法

我们分析了 2018-19 年在 Cwm Taf Morgannwg 大学健康委员会(CTM UHB)区域内安全匿名信息链接(SAIL)数据库中注册的全科医生就诊的 412997 名患者的记录链接数据。我们使用基于利用的 k-均值聚类(全科医生就诊次数、处方、急诊和选择性入院、急症和门诊)和 2018 年的慢性病计数为 10 个段创建了不同的变量组合来表示需求。我们评估了片段的特征。我们采用了一个训练/测试方案(80%的训练集),比较了 2019 年随访时的逻辑回归模型预测与观察结果。我们评估了包含人口统计学变量的模型的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC),以及包含和不包含片段的模型,以及片段实现之间的 AUC(包含/不包含合并症和初级保健数据)。

结果

在包含人口统计学协变量的模型中添加片段可提高所有结果的预测能力。对于急诊入院,从 AUC 0.65(CI 0.64-0.65)提高到 0.73(CI 0.73-0.74)。仅使用片段的模型表现几乎与完整模型一样好。排除合并症会降低死亡率的预测能力(否则类似),但当排除所有初级保健变量时,预测能力的降低最为明显。

结论

这表明这些片段具有令人满意的预测能力,即使对于不同的结果和广泛的事件和条件用于细分。这表明,这些片段可以作为帮助确定需要针对性护理的特定需求群体的有用工具。可以通过选择诊断或更专业的工具(如风险分层)来细化识别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8a/11184761/432d0589078a/12889_2024_19065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8a/11184761/432d0589078a/12889_2024_19065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8a/11184761/432d0589078a/12889_2024_19065_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How predictive of future healthcare utilisation and mortality is data-driven population segmentation based on healthcare utilisation and chronic condition comorbidity?基于医疗利用和慢性病共病的数据分析驱动的人群细分对未来医疗保健利用和死亡率的预测能力如何?
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):1621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19065-w.
2
Can cluster analyses of linked healthcare data identify unique population segments in a general practice-registered population?基于链接的医疗保健数据的聚类分析能否在一般实践注册人群中识别出独特的人群细分?
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08930-z.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Patterns of healthcare utilisation in children and young people: a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected healthcare data in Northwest London.儿童和青少年医疗保健利用模式:使用伦敦西北部常规收集的医疗保健数据进行的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e050847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050847.
5
Assessing the validity of a data driven segmentation approach: A 4 year longitudinal study of healthcare utilization and mortality.评估数据驱动分割方法的有效性:一项针对医疗利用和死亡率的 4 年纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195243. eCollection 2018.
6
Predictive ability of an expert-defined population segmentation framework for healthcare utilization and mortality - a retrospective cohort study.专家定义的人群细分框架对医疗利用和死亡率的预测能力-一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4251-6.
7
A quantitative evidence base for population health: applying utilization-based cluster analysis to segment a patient population.基于定量证据的人群健康:应用基于利用情况的聚类分析对患者群体进行细分。
Popul Health Metr. 2016 Nov 25;14:44. doi: 10.1186/s12963-016-0115-z.
8
Applying a data-driven population segmentation approach in German claims data.运用数据驱动的人群细分方法分析德国理赔数据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09620-3.
9
Comorbidity, healthcare utilisation and process of care measures in patients with congenital heart disease in the UK: cross-sectional, population-based study with case-control analysis.英国先天性心脏病患者的合并症、医疗保健利用及护理过程指标:一项基于人群的横断面病例对照研究。
Heart. 2008 Sep;94(9):1194-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.122671. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
10
Validity of the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups system on the utilisation of healthcare services in Norway: a retrospective cross-sectional study.约翰霍普金斯调整临床分组系统在挪威医疗服务利用中的有效性:一项回顾性横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11715-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Johns Hopkins ACG Case-Mix System for population segmentation in a hospital-based adult patient population in Singapore.在新加坡以医院为基础的成年患者人群中,使用约翰霍普金斯 ACG 病例组合系统进行人群细分。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 30;13(3):e062786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062786.
2
Can cluster analyses of linked healthcare data identify unique population segments in a general practice-registered population?基于链接的医疗保健数据的聚类分析能否在一般实践注册人群中识别出独特的人群细分?
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08930-z.
3
Population segmentation based on healthcare needs: a systematic review.
基于医疗需求的人群细分:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 13;8(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1105-6.
4
Predictive ability of an expert-defined population segmentation framework for healthcare utilization and mortality - a retrospective cohort study.专家定义的人群细分框架对医疗利用和死亡率的预测能力-一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4251-6.
5
A systematic review of the clinical application of data-driven population segmentation analysis.数据驱动的人群细分分析在临床应用中的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0584-9.
6
Assessing the validity of a data driven segmentation approach: A 4 year longitudinal study of healthcare utilization and mortality.评估数据驱动分割方法的有效性:一项针对医疗利用和死亡率的 4 年纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195243. eCollection 2018.
7
Population and patient factors affecting emergency department attendance in London: retrospective cohort analysis of linked primary and secondary care records.人口和患者因素对伦敦急诊科就诊的影响:基于初级和二级保健记录的链接回顾性队列分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Mar;68(668):e157-e167. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X694397. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
8
A quantitative evidence base for population health: applying utilization-based cluster analysis to segment a patient population.基于定量证据的人群健康:应用基于利用情况的聚类分析对患者群体进行细分。
Popul Health Metr. 2016 Nov 25;14:44. doi: 10.1186/s12963-016-0115-z.
9
Designing services for frequent attenders to the emergency department: a characterisation of this population to inform service design.为急诊科频繁就诊者设计服务:对这一人群的特征描述以指导服务设计。
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Aug;16(4):325-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-4-325.
10
Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 European countries.多重疾病、医疗保健利用与健康状况之间的关联:来自16个欧洲国家的证据。
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):431-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw044. Epub 2016 Mar 24.