OCON Centre for Orthopaedic Surgery, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):479-487. doi: 10.1177/0363546517746112. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has proven to be a very safe therapeutic option in the treatment of tendon, muscle, bone, and cartilage injuries. Currently, several commercial separation systems are available for the preparation of PRP. The concentrations of blood components in PRP among these separation systems vary substantially.
To systematically review and evaluate the differences between the concentrations of blood components in PRP produced by various PRP separation systems.
Systematic review.
MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE were searched for studies that compared the concentrations of blood components and growth factors in PRP between various separation systems and studies that reported on the concentrations of blood components and growth factors of single separation systems. The primary outcomes were platelet count, leukocyte count, and concentration of growth factors (eg, platelet-derived growth factor-AB [PDGF-AB], transforming growth factor-β1 [TGF-β1], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]). Furthermore, the preparation protocols and prices of the systems were compared.
There were 1079 studies found, of which 19 studies were selected for inclusion in this review. The concentrations of platelets and leukocytes in PRP differed largely between, and to a lesser extent within, the studied PRP separation systems. Additionally, large differences both between and within the studied PRP separation systems were found for all the growth factors. Furthermore, preparation protocols and prices varied widely between systems.
There is a large heterogeneity between PRP separation systems regarding concentrations of platelets, leukocytes, and growth factors in PRP. The choice for the most appropriate type of PRP should be based on the specific clinical field of application. As the ideal concentrations of blood components and growth factors for the specific fields of application are yet to be determined for most of the fields, future research should focus on which type of PRP is most suitable for the specific field.
富含血小板的血浆 (PRP) 已被证明是治疗肌腱、肌肉、骨骼和软骨损伤的非常安全的治疗选择。目前,有几种商业分离系统可用于 PRP 的制备。这些分离系统中 PRP 中血液成分的浓度差异很大。
系统地回顾和评估各种 PRP 分离系统制备的 PRP 中血液成分浓度的差异。
系统评价。
检索 MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库 (CENTRAL) 和 EMBASE,以查找比较不同分离系统之间 PRP 中血液成分和生长因子浓度的研究,以及报告单个分离系统中血液成分和生长因子浓度的研究。主要结局指标为血小板计数、白细胞计数和生长因子浓度(如血小板衍生生长因子-AB [PDGF-AB]、转化生长因子-β1 [TGF-β1]和血管内皮生长因子 [VEGF])。此外,还比较了系统的制备方案和价格。
共发现 1079 项研究,其中 19 项研究被纳入本综述。PRP 分离系统之间以及内部的 PRP 中血小板和白细胞的浓度差异很大。此外,在所研究的 PRP 分离系统中,所有生长因子之间和内部都存在很大差异。此外,系统之间的制备方案和价格差异很大。
PRP 分离系统之间在 PRP 中血小板、白细胞和生长因子的浓度方面存在很大的异质性。最合适的 PRP 类型的选择应基于具体的临床应用领域。由于大多数领域尚未确定特定应用领域的理想血液成分和生长因子浓度,因此未来的研究应侧重于哪种类型的 PRP 最适合特定领域。