Jain Karun, Jeyaraman Madhan, Jeyaraman Naveen, Gupta Ashim
Pushpanjali Medical Centre, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Delhi, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Oct 5;58(12):1833-1843. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Non-union fractures represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, contributing to considerable morbidity and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments, such as autologous bone grafting, are effective but have limitations, including donor-site morbidity and limited tissue availability. Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics, including growth factor-rich concentrate (GFC), have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, leveraging the body's natural healing mechanisms by concentrating and applying growth factors directly to the fracture site. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of GFC injections in the treatment of non-union fractures.
This quasi-experimental study included 17 patients with non-union fractures of various long bones, treated under fluoroscopic guidance with three doses of 5 mL GFC injections, administered 2 weeks apart at the non-union site. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and comorbid conditions were recorded. Growth factor levels were quantified via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and statistical analyses were conducted to explore associations between the amount of growth factors and treatment outcomes. Radiographic assessments and bony callus appearance were evaluated at the baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up post-last injection.
No adverse effects were reported throughout the duration of the study. The majority of patients (82.4%) showed significant improvement, evidenced by enhanced bony callus formation and reduced non-union signs. No significant correlation was found between the specific growth factor levels and the clinical outcomes of non-union of fractures. However, the presence of comorbid conditions significantly influenced treatment efficacy, underscoring the importance of patient selection in clinical practice.
Administration of GFC injection is safe and potentially efficacious for the treatment of non-union fractures, offering an alternative to traditional surgical interventions. These results laid the foundation for prospective, adequately powered, randomized and non-randomized clinical studies with longer follow-up to further establish the efficacy of GFC in patients with non-union fractures. Moreover, formulation protocols need to be optimized while considering patient-specific variables, to ensure reproducibility and repeatability of outcomes from these studies.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1.
骨不连骨折是骨科临床实践中的一项重大挑战,会导致相当高的发病率和社会经济负担。传统治疗方法,如自体骨移植,虽然有效,但存在局限性,包括供区发病风险和组织供应有限。自体外周血来源的骨科生物制剂,包括富含生长因子的浓缩物(GFC),已成为一种微创替代方法,通过浓缩并直接将生长因子应用于骨折部位,利用人体自然愈合机制。本研究评估了GFC注射治疗骨不连骨折的安全性和有效性。
这项准实验研究纳入了17例不同长骨骨不连骨折患者,在透视引导下于骨不连部位分三次注射5毫升GFC,每次间隔2周。记录人口统计学数据、损伤特征和合并症。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)对生长因子水平进行定量,并进行统计分析以探索生长因子量与治疗结果之间的关联。在基线以及最后一次注射后的1个月、3个月和6个月随访时评估影像学表现和骨痂外观。
在整个研究期间未报告不良反应。大多数患者(82.4%)显示出显著改善,表现为骨痂形成增强和骨不连征象减少。未发现特定生长因子水平与骨折不愈合的临床结果之间存在显著相关性。然而,合并症的存在显著影响治疗效果,强调了临床实践中患者选择的重要性。
注射GFC治疗骨不连骨折是安全且可能有效的,为传统手术干预提供了一种替代方法。这些结果为进一步开展前瞻性、有足够样本量、随机和非随机的长期随访临床研究奠定了基础,以进一步确定GFC在骨不连骨折患者中的疗效。此外,在考虑患者特定变量的同时,需要优化配方方案,以确保这些研究结果的可重复性。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s43465-024-01278-1获取的补充材料。