• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价和使用质量标准评估阿斯巴甜致癌性生物检测。

Systematic review and evaluation of aspartame carcinogenicity bioassays using quality criteria.

机构信息

Intertek Regulatory & Scientific Consultancy, 2233 Argentia Rd., Suite 201, Mississauga, ON, L5N 2X7, Canada.

Intertek Regulatory & Scientific Consultancy, 2233 Argentia Rd., Suite 201, Mississauga, ON, L5N 2X7, Canada.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.009
PMID:29339245
Abstract

The current review assessed cancer studies of aspartame based on a quality appraisal using the Klimisch grading system. Nine studies having complete histopathology were included: three 2-year studies by Searle; three transgenic mice studies by the NTP; three lifetime studies by the Ramazzini Institute. A tenth study limited to brain tumors was not rated. None were determined as Klimisch Code 1 (reliable without restrictions). The Searle studies predated GLP standards but their methodology was comparable; transgenic mouse models are not validated, but are accepted as supporting data. These studies were rated Klimisch Code 2 (reliable with restrictions). The Ramazzini Institute used a lifetime model of their own design that has been questioned due to high rates of spontaneous tumors, issues with tumor type diagnosis and concerns about the impact of chronic infections. As many of these problems could be attributed to using animals that died or were terminated near end of life, along with the other problems noted, these studies were rated Klimisch Code 3 (not reliable). As the Klimisch Code 2 studies demonstrated a lack of carcinogenic potential, and as aspartame is hydrolyzed to common components and lacks genotoxic activity, a conclusion that aspartame is not carcinogenic is supported.

摘要

本综述评估了基于 Klimisch 分级系统的质量评估的阿斯巴甜致癌研究。共有 9 项具有完整组织病理学的研究被纳入:Searle 的三项为期 2 年的研究;NTP 的三项转基因小鼠研究;Ramazzini 研究所的三项终生研究。第十项仅限于脑肿瘤的研究未被评级。没有一项被确定为 Klimisch 代码 1(可靠,无限制)。Searle 的研究早于 GLP 标准,但它们的方法学是可比的;转基因小鼠模型未经验证,但被认为是支持数据。这些研究被评为 Klimisch 代码 2(可靠,但有限制)。Ramazzini 研究所使用了他们自己设计的终生模型,由于自发肿瘤的高发生率、肿瘤类型诊断的问题以及对慢性感染影响的担忧,该模型受到了质疑。由于这些问题中的许多可以归因于使用接近生命末期死亡或终止的动物,以及其他注意到的问题,这些研究被评为 Klimisch 代码 3(不可靠)。由于 Klimisch 代码 2 研究表明缺乏致癌潜力,并且阿斯巴甜被水解为常见成分,缺乏遗传毒性活性,因此阿斯巴甜没有致癌性的结论得到了支持。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and evaluation of aspartame carcinogenicity bioassays using quality criteria.系统评价和使用质量标准评估阿斯巴甜致癌性生物检测。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
Understanding the link between aspartame and cancer.了解阿斯巴甜与癌症之间的联系。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2024 Sep;24(9):793-802. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2383675. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Histological analyses of the Ishii (1981) rat carcinogenicity study of aspartame and comparison with the Ramazzini Institute studies.对依希(1981)阿斯巴甜致癌性大鼠研究的组织学分析,并与拉马齐尼研究所的研究进行比较。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;102:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Pathologists' perspective on the study design, analysis, and interpretation of proliferative lesions in lifetime and prenatal rodent carcinogenicity bioassays of aspartame.病理学家视角下的阿斯巴甜终生和产前啮齿动物致癌性生物测定中增生性病变的研究设计、分析和解读。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2023 Jan;171:113504. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113504. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
5
Lack of potential carcinogenicity for aspartame - Systematic evaluation and integration of mechanistic data into the totality of the evidence.阿斯巴甜无致癌潜力-机制数据与整体证据的系统评价与整合。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Jan;135:110866. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110866. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
6
The carcinogenic effects of aspartame: The urgent need for regulatory re-evaluation.阿斯巴甜的致癌作用:监管重新评估的迫切需求。
Am J Ind Med. 2014 Apr;57(4):383-97. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22296. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
7
Results of long-term carcinogenicity bioassay on Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to aspartame administered in feed.对通过饲料给予阿斯巴甜的斯普拉格-道利大鼠进行长期致癌性生物测定的结果。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Sep;1076:559-77. doi: 10.1196/annals.1371.080.
8
Updated systematic assessment of human, animal and mechanistic evidence demonstrates lack of human carcinogenicity with consumption of aspartame.对人类、动物和机制证据的最新系统评估表明,食用阿斯巴甜不存在人类致癌性。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2023 Feb;172:113549. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113549. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Aspartame, a bittersweet pill.阿斯巴甜,一种甜中带苦的药丸。
Carcinogenesis. 2017 Dec 7;38(12):1249-1250. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgw025.
10
Evaluation of aspartame cancer epidemiology studies based on quality appraisal criteria.基于质量评价标准评估阿斯巴甜致癌流行病学研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity prediction of sugar substitutes: an approach with compound-gene interactions network.糖替代品的致突变性和致癌性预测:一种基于化合物-基因相互作用网络的方法。
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2025 Jan 17;14(1):tfaf008. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfaf008. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study.人工甜味剂与癌症风险:基于 NutriNet-Santé 人群队列研究的结果。
PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 24;19(3):e1003950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003950. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Aspartame-True or False? Narrative Review of Safety Analysis of General Use in Products.
阿斯巴甜——是与非?关于其在产品中普遍使用的安全性分析的叙述性综述
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 7;13(6):1957. doi: 10.3390/nu13061957.
4
High Concentrations of Aspartame Induce Pro-Angiogenic Effects in Ovo and Cytotoxic Effects in HT-29 Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cells.高浓度阿斯巴甜在鸡胚中诱导促血管生成作用,并对 HT-29 人结肠癌细胞产生细胞毒性作用。
Nutrients. 2020 Nov 24;12(12):3600. doi: 10.3390/nu12123600.