Cescon Corrado, Tettamanti Andrea, Barbero Marco, Gatti Roberto
Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland.
Laboratory of Analysis and Rehabilitation of Motor Function, Neuroscience Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Arch Physiother. 2015 Aug 25;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40945-015-0008-7. eCollection 2015.
The analysis of joints kinematics is important in clinical practice and in research. Nowadays it is possible to evaluate the mobility of joints in vivo with different motion capture techniques available in the market. Optical systems use infrared cameras and reflective markers to evaluate body movements, while other systems use electromagnetic fields to detect position and orientation of sensors. The aim of this study was the evaluation of two motion capture systems based on different technologies (optical and electromagnetic) by comparing the distribution of finite helical axis (FHA) of rotation during controlled rotations of an object in different positions.
The distribution of position and angle errors of the FHA were extracted by optical and electromagnetic system recordings during a controlled rotation of a low friction stool in different positions in a controlled environment.
The optical motion capture system showed lower angle and position errors in the distribution of FHA while the electromagnetic system had higher errors that increased with increasing distance from the antenna.
The optical system showed lower errors in the estimation of FHA that could make it preferable with respect to electromagnetic systems during joint kinematics.
关节运动学分析在临床实践和研究中都很重要。如今,利用市场上现有的不同运动捕捉技术可以在体内评估关节的活动度。光学系统使用红外摄像机和反光标记来评估身体运动,而其他系统则使用电磁场来检测传感器的位置和方向。本研究的目的是通过比较物体在不同位置进行受控旋转时旋转的有限螺旋轴(FHA)分布,来评估基于不同技术(光学和电磁)的两种运动捕捉系统。
在受控环境中,通过光学和电磁系统记录,在低摩擦凳子于不同位置进行受控旋转时,提取FHA的位置和角度误差分布。
光学运动捕捉系统在FHA分布中显示出较低的角度和位置误差,而电磁系统的误差较高,且随着与天线距离的增加而增大。
光学系统在FHA估计中显示出较低的误差,这使得它在关节运动学方面相对于电磁系统更具优势。