Báez-Saldaña Renata, Rumbo-Nava Uriel, Escobar-Rojas Araceli, Castillo-González Patricia, León-Dueñas Santiago, Aguirre-Pérez Teresa, Vázquez-Manríquez María Eugenia
. Servicio Clínico de Neumología Oncológica, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Ciudad de México, México.
. División de Posgrado, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México.
J Bras Pneumol. 2017 Nov-Dec;43(6):424-430. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000323.
Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion.
This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables.
A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82.
CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.
既往研究表明,闭式胸膜活检(CPB)诊断恶性肿瘤的灵敏度低于60%。因此,最近关于CPB作为一种诊断检测方法的价值出现了争议。我们的目的是评估CPB在诊断胸腔积液患者恶性肿瘤方面的准确性。
这是一项为期8年的前瞻性研究,研究对象为接受CPB以明确胸腔积液病因的个体。从解剖病理学报告和病历中获取每位患者的信息。当CPB结果显示为恶性肿瘤或结核时,活检被视为诊断性的,即为最终诊断。在活检组织病理学结果不具有特异性的病例中,根据其他诊断程序确定最终诊断,如胸腔镜检查、开胸手术、纤维支气管镜检查、胸腔积液的生化和细胞检测及/或微生物学检测。通过2×2列联表确定CPB的准确性。
共研究了1034例胸腔积液患者的活检样本。其中,171例(16.54%)因样本不足或信息不充分被排除在准确性分析之外。准确性分析结果如下:灵敏度为77%;特异度为98%;阳性预测值为99%;阴性预测值为66%;阳性似然比为38.5;阴性似然比为0.23;验前概率为2.13;验后概率为82。
CPB作为一种诊断检测方法在临床实践中是有用的,因为从验前概率到验后概率有重要变化。