Conceição Thais Martins Albanaz da, Gonzáles Ana Inês, Figueiredo Fernanda Cabral Xavier Sarmento de, Vieira Danielle Soares Rocha, Bündchen Daiana Cristine
Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Araranguá, (SC), Brasil.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):509-519. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170076.
Mobilization of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units should be performed based on safety criteria. The aim of the present review was to establish which safety criteria are most often used to start early mobilization for patients under mechanical ventilation admitted to intensive care units. Articles were searched in the PubMed, PEDro, LILACS, Cochrane and CINAHL databases; randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, comparative studies with or without simultaneous controls, case series with 10 or more consecutive cases and descriptive studies were included. The same was performed regarding prospective, retrospective or cross-sectional studies where safety criteria to start early mobilization should be described in the Methods section. Two reviewers independently selected potentially eligible studies according to the established inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the studies' methodological quality. Narrative description was employed in data analysis to summarize the characteristics and results of the included studies; safety criteria were categorized as follows: cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, orthopedic and other. A total of 37 articles were considered eligible. Cardiovascular safety criteria exhibited the largest number of variables. However, respiratory safety criteria exhibited higher concordance among studies. There was greater divergence among the authors regarding neurological criteria. There is a need to reinforce the recognition of the safety criteria used to start early mobilization for critically ill patients; the parameters and variables found might contribute to inclusion into service routines so as to start, make progress and guide clinical practice.
对入住重症监护病房的危重症患者进行活动应基于安全标准。本综述的目的是确定哪些安全标准最常用于对入住重症监护病房且接受机械通气的患者进行早期活动。在PubMed、PEDro、LILACS、Cochrane和CINAHL数据库中检索文章;纳入随机和半随机临床试验、队列研究、有或无同期对照的比较研究、10例或更多连续病例的病例系列以及描述性研究。对于前瞻性、回顾性或横断面研究也进行同样的检索,前提是在方法部分应描述开始早期活动的安全标准。两名评审员根据既定的纳入标准独立选择可能符合条件的研究,提取数据并评估研究的方法学质量。数据分析采用叙述性描述来总结纳入研究的特征和结果;安全标准分为以下几类:心血管、呼吸、神经、骨科和其他。共有37篇文章被认为符合条件。心血管安全标准的变量数量最多。然而,呼吸安全标准在各研究中表现出更高的一致性。作者们在神经标准方面存在更大的分歧。有必要加强对用于危重症患者早期活动启动的安全标准的认识;所发现的参数和变量可能有助于纳入服务流程,从而启动、推进并指导临床实践。