• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西澳大利亚州(2015 - 2016年)计划在分娩时采用水中分娩的女性的产科和新生儿结局:临床结局的回顾性审计

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women intending to use immersion in water for labour and birth in Western Australia (2015-2016): A retrospective audit of clinical outcomes.

作者信息

Lewis Lucy, Hauck Yvonne L, Butt Janice, Hornbuckle Janet

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;58(5):539-547. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12758. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.12758
PMID:29344940
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research supports water immersion for labour if women are healthy, with no obstetric or medical risk factors.

AIMS

To evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women intending to use immersion in water for labour or birth.

METHODS

Retrospective audit of clinical outcomes for women intending to labour or birth in water conducted between July 2015 and June 2016, at a tertiary maternity hospital in Western Australia. Obstetric and neonatal data were collected from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was utilised to investigate women who laboured in water stratified by those who birthed in water.

RESULTS

A total of 502 women intended to labour or birth in water; 199 (40%) did not and 303 (60%) did. The majority of women using water immersion (179 of 303; 59%) birthed in water. Multiparous women were more likely than primparous to birth in water (73% vs 46%; P < 0.001). Women who birthed in water were at increased odds of: a first stage labour ≤240 min (odds ratio (OR) 2.56, 95% CI 1.34-4.87, P = 0.004); a second stage ≤60 min (OR 3.53, 95% CI 1.82-6.84, P < 0.000); a third stage labour of 11-30 min (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.23-3.78, P = 0.008); and having an intact perineum (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.70-5.64, P < 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Not all women who set out to labour and birth in water achieve their aim. There is a need for high-quality collaborative research into this option of labour and birth, so women can make an informed choice around this birth option.

摘要

背景

研究表明,如果女性身体健康,没有产科或医学风险因素,分娩时可采用水浸法。

目的

评估打算在分娩或生产时采用水浸法的女性的产科和新生儿结局。

方法

对2015年7月至2016年6月期间在西澳大利亚一家三级妇产医院打算在水中分娩或生产的女性的临床结局进行回顾性审计。从病历中收集产科和新生儿数据。采用多变量逻辑回归分析对在水中分娩的女性与在水中待产的女性进行分层研究。

结果

共有502名女性打算在水中分娩或生产;199名(40%)未采用,303名(60%)采用了。大多数采用水浸法的女性(303名中的179名;59%)在水中分娩。经产妇比初产妇更有可能在水中分娩(73%对46%;P<0.001)。在水中分娩的女性出现以下情况的几率增加:第一产程≤240分钟(优势比(OR)2.56,95%置信区间1.34 - 4.87,P = 0.004);第二产程≤60分钟(OR 3.53,95%置信区间1.82 - 6.84,P < 0.000);第三产程11 - 30分钟(OR 2.15,95%置信区间1.23 - 3.78,P = 0.008);以及会阴完整(OR 3.10,95%置信区间1.70 - 5.64,P < 0.000)。

结论

并非所有打算在水中分娩或生产的女性都能实现其目标。需要对这种分娩方式进行高质量的合作研究,以便女性能够围绕这种分娩方式做出明智的选择。

相似文献

1
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women intending to use immersion in water for labour and birth in Western Australia (2015-2016): A retrospective audit of clinical outcomes.西澳大利亚州(2015 - 2016年)计划在分娩时采用水中分娩的女性的产科和新生儿结局:临床结局的回顾性审计
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;58(5):539-547. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12758. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth.系统回顾和荟萃分析,以检查分娩期间和水中分娩时浸入水中的产时干预措施以及母婴结局。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e056517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056517.
3
Outcomes of Waterbirth in a US Hospital-Based Midwifery Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Water Immersion During Labor and Birth.美国医院助产实践中水中分娩的结局:一项回顾性队列研究,研究分娩期间的水中浸泡。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):216-223. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13033. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Maternal and neonatal outcomes among spontaneous vaginal births occurring in or out of water following intrapartum water immersion: The POOL cohort study.水中分娩与非水中分娩的母婴结局:POOL 队列研究。
BJOG. 2024 Nov;131(12):1650-1659. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17878. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
The association between waterbirth and perineal injury or other adverse outcomes among low-risk women with physiological birth: Results from the Nordic Home Birth Cohort Study.低风险生理分娩女性中水中分娩与会阴损伤或其他不良结局的关联:北欧家庭分娩队列研究结果
Women Birth. 2024 Jul;37(4):101625. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101625. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Prevalence of Prolonged Latent Phase and Labor Outcomes: Review of Birth Records in a Swedish Population.产程潜伏期延长的患病率及分娩结局:瑞典人群出生记录回顾
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12704.
7
Midwives' experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth.助产士在水中分娩或生产方面的教育、知识和实践经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0.
8
Waterbirth: a national retrospective cohort study of factors associated with its use among women in England.水中分娩:一项全国性回顾性队列研究,探讨了英格兰妇女使用水中分娩的相关因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 26;21(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03724-6.
9
Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study.在意大利产科病房使用分娩池的分娩妇女:前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 14;14:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-17.
10
A comparative study between the pioneer cohort of waterbirths and conventional vaginal deliveries in an obstetrician-led unit in Singapore.新加坡一家由产科医生主导的机构中,水中分娩先驱队列与传统阴道分娩的比较研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;55(3):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.04.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Hydrotherapy on the Management of Childbirth and Its Outcomes-A Retrospective Cohort Study.水疗法对分娩管理及其结局的影响——一项回顾性队列研究
Nurs Rep. 2024 May 20;14(2):1251-1259. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14020095.
2
Understanding the barriers and facilitators related to birthing pool use from organisational and multi-professional perspectives: a mixed-methods systematic review.从组织和多专业角度理解与分娩池使用相关的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2023 Oct 4;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01690-0.
3
Safety and Effect of the Use of Hydrotherapy during Labour: A Retrospective Observational Study.
分娩期间使用水疗法的安全性和效果:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 28;12(17):5617. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175617.
4
Is a randomized controlled trial of waterbirth possible? An Australian feasibility study.水中分娩的随机对照试验是否可行?一项澳大利亚的可行性研究。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):697-708. doi: 10.1111/birt.12635. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity score-matched land births.水中分娩的母婴结局:17530 例水中分娩和 17530 例倾向评分匹配的陆地分娩队列研究。
BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):950-958. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17009. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
6
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Hospital-Based Deliveries With Water Immersion.水中分娩的母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):707-715. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003956.
7
Midwives' experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth.助产士在水中分娩或生产方面的教育、知识和实践经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0.