• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助产士在水中分娩或生产方面的教育、知识和实践经验。

Midwives' experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, 6102, Australia.

Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, 6008, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0
PMID:29921233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6008918/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited research examining midwives' education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth. Our aim was to address this gap in evidence and build knowledge around this important topic.

METHODS

This mixed method study was performed in two phases, between August and December 2016, in the birth centre of a tertiary public maternity hospital in Western Australia. Phase one utilised a cross sectional design to examine perceptions of education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth through a questionnaire. Phase two employed a qualitative descriptive design and focus groups to explore what midwives enjoyed about caring for women who labour or birth in water and the challenges midwives experienced with waterbirth. Frequency distributions were employed for quantitative data. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract common themes from focus group transcripts.

RESULTS

The majority (85%; 29 of 34) of midwives surveyed returned a questionnaire. Results from phase one confirmed that following training, 93% (27 of 29) of midwives felt equipped to facilitate waterbirth and the mean waterbirths required to facilitate confidence was seven. Midwives were confident caring for women in water during the first, second and third stage of labour and enjoyed facilitating water immersion for labour and birth. Finally, responses to labour and birth scenarios indicated midwives were practicing according to state-wide clinical guidance. Phase two included two focus groups of seven and five midwives. Exploration of what midwives enjoyed about caring for women who used water immersion revealed three themes: instinctive birthing; woman-centred atmosphere; and undisturbed space. Exploration of the challenges experienced with waterbirth revealed two themes: learning through reflection and facilities required to support waterbirth.

CONCLUSIONS

This research contributes to the growing knowledge base examining midwives' education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth. It also highlights the importance of exploring what immersion in water for labour and birth offers midwives, as this research suggests they are integral to sustaining waterbirth as an option for low risk women.

摘要

背景

目前,关于助产士在水中分娩或待产方面的教育、知识和实践的研究有限。我们旨在填补这一证据空白,并围绕这一重要主题增加知识储备。

方法

这项混合方法研究分两个阶段进行,于 2016 年 8 月至 12 月在西澳大利亚州一家三级公立医院的分娩中心进行。第一阶段采用横断面设计,通过问卷调查了解助产士对水中分娩的教育、知识和实践的看法。第二阶段采用定性描述性设计和焦点小组探讨助产士在水中照顾分娩或待产妇女的乐趣以及助产士在水中分娩方面面临的挑战。对定量数据采用频率分布。从焦点小组记录中提取共同主题进行主题分析。

结果

接受调查的助产士中,有 85%(29/34)返回了问卷。第一阶段的结果证实,在接受培训后,93%(27/29)的助产士认为自己有能力促进水中分娩,而需要促进信心的平均水中分娩次数为 7 次。助产士在分娩的第一、第二和第三阶段对在水中的妇女有信心,并喜欢促进分娩和分娩的水中浸入。最后,对分娩和分娩场景的反应表明,助产士正在按照全州范围的临床指导进行实践。第二阶段包括两个 7 人和 5 名助产士的焦点小组。探讨助产士在水中照顾产妇的乐趣时,发现了三个主题:本能分娩;以妇女为中心的氛围;以及不受干扰的空间。探讨水中分娩所面临的挑战时发现了两个主题:通过反思学习和支持水中分娩所需的设施。

结论

这项研究有助于增加关于助产士在水中分娩或待产方面的教育、知识和实践的知识基础。它还强调了探讨水中分娩为助产士带来的好处的重要性,因为这项研究表明,助产士是维持水中分娩作为低风险妇女选择的关键。

相似文献

1
Midwives' experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth.助产士在水中分娩或生产方面的教育、知识和实践经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0.
2
Exploring midwives' perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study.探索西澳大利亚助产士对协助水中分娩的信心认知:一项质性描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2016 Feb;33:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
3
Effecting change in midwives' waterbirth practice behaviours on labour ward: an action research study.影响助产士在产房水中分娩实践行为的改变:一项行动研究
Midwifery. 2014 Mar;30(3):e96-e101. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth.系统回顾和荟萃分析,以检查分娩期间和水中分娩时浸入水中的产时干预措施以及母婴结局。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e056517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056517.
5
Australian midwives views and experiences of practice and politics related to water immersion for labour and birth: A web based survey.澳大利亚助产士对水中分娩相关实践和政治的看法和经验:一项基于网络的调查。
Women Birth. 2018 Jun;31(3):184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
6
'They follow the wants and needs of an institution': Midwives' views of water immersion.“她们满足机构的需求”:助产士对水中分娩的看法。
Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):e178-e187. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Practitioner accreditation for the practice of water immersion during labour and birth: Results from a mixed methods study.从业者认证以实践水中分娩:一项混合方法研究的结果。
Women Birth. 2019 Jun;32(3):255-262. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.08.165. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
A systematic meta-thematic synthesis to examine the views and experiences of women following water immersion during labour and waterbirth.一项系统元主题综合分析,旨在研究妇女在分娩和水中分娩期间进行水中浸泡后的观点和体验。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):2942-2956. doi: 10.1111/jan.14720. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
Developing and evaluating an online learning tool to improve midwives' accuracy of visual estimation of blood loss during waterbirth: An experimental study.开发并评估一种在线学习工具以提高助产士对水中分娩时失血情况的视觉估计准确性:一项实验研究。
Midwifery. 2019 Jan;68:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
10
Factors hindering midwives' utilisation of alternative birth positions during labour in a selected public hospital.某公立医院中阻碍助产士在分娩过程中采用替代分娩姿势的因素。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019 Sep 17;11(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.2071.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the barriers and facilitators related to birthing pool use from organisational and multi-professional perspectives: a mixed-methods systematic review.从组织和多专业角度理解与分娩池使用相关的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2023 Oct 4;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01690-0.
2
Experiences of water immersion during childbirth: a qualitative thematic synthesis.分娩时水中浸泡的体验:定性主题综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 29;23(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05690-7.
3
Effect Analysis of Midwife Education and Training with PDCA Model.PDCA 模式下助产士教育与培训效果分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 30;2022:7397186. doi: 10.1155/2022/7397186. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Immersion in water during labour and birth.分娩过程中浸泡在水中。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4.
2
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women intending to use immersion in water for labour and birth in Western Australia (2015-2016): A retrospective audit of clinical outcomes.西澳大利亚州(2015 - 2016年)计划在分娩时采用水中分娩的女性的产科和新生儿结局:临床结局的回顾性审计
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;58(5):539-547. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12758. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
3
The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth.实现水中分娩和未实现水中分娩的女性的看法和体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1637-5.
4
Australian midwives views and experiences of practice and politics related to water immersion for labour and birth: A web based survey.澳大利亚助产士对水中分娩相关实践和政治的看法和经验:一项基于网络的调查。
Women Birth. 2018 Jun;31(3):184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
A critical analysis of Australian policies and guidelines for water immersion during labour and birth.对澳大利亚分娩期间水浸政策和指南的批判性分析。
Women Birth. 2017 Oct;30(5):431-441. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Factors influencing midwives' use of an evidenced based Normal Birth Guideline.影响助产士使用基于证据的正常分娩指南的因素。
Women Birth. 2017 Oct;30(5):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.产时保健模式:助产连续性照护的证据。
Med J Aust. 2016 Oct 17;205(8):370-374. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00844.
8
Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide.超越过少、过晚、过多、过快:迈向全球循证且尊重的母婴照护之路。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2176-2192. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
Making Room at the Table for Obstetrics, Midwifery, and a Culture of Normalcy Within Maternity Care.在孕产妇护理中为产科、助产及正常分娩文化留出空间。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;128(1):176-80. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001493.
10
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.