Tsegai Zewdi J, Skinner Matthew M, Pahr Dieter H, Hublin Jean-Jacques, Kivell Tracy L
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Skeletal Biology Research Centre, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
J Anat. 2018 Apr;232(4):641-656. doi: 10.1111/joa.12776. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
Aspects of trabecular bone architecture are thought to reflect regional loading of the skeleton, and thus differ between primate taxa with different locomotor and postural modes. However, there are several systemic factors that affect bone structure that could contribute to, or be the primary factor determining, interspecific differences in bone structure. These systemic factors include differences in genetic regulation, sensitivity to loading, hormone levels, diet, and activity levels. Improved understanding of inter-/intraspecific variability, and variability across the skeleton of an individual, is required to interpret properly potential functional signals present within trabecular structure. Using a whole-region method of analysis, we investigated trabecular structure throughout the skeleton of humans and chimpanzees. Trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), degree of anisotropy (DA) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) were quantified from high resolution micro-computed tomographic scans of the humeral and femoral head, third metacarpal and third metatarsal head, distal tibia, talus and first thoracic vertebra. We found that BV/TV is, in most anatomical sites, significantly higher in chimpanzees than in humans, suggesting a systemic difference in trabecular structure unrelated to local loading regime. Differences in BV/TV between the forelimb and hindlimb did not clearly reflect differences in locomotor loading in the study taxa. There were no clear systemic differences between the taxa in DA and, as such, this parameter might reflect function and relate to differences in joint loading. This systemic approach reveals both the pattern of variability across the skeleton and between taxa, and helps identify those features of trabecular structure that may relate to joint function.
小梁骨结构的各个方面被认为反映了骨骼的局部负荷,因此在具有不同运动和姿势模式的灵长类分类群之间存在差异。然而,有几个影响骨骼结构的全身因素可能导致种间骨骼结构差异,或者是决定这种差异的主要因素。这些全身因素包括基因调控差异、对负荷的敏感性、激素水平、饮食和活动水平。为了正确解释小梁结构中潜在的功能信号,需要更好地理解种间/种内变异性以及个体骨骼间的变异性。我们采用全区域分析方法,研究了人类和黑猩猩整个骨骼的小梁结构。从小梁骨体积分数(BV/TV)、各向异性程度(DA)和小梁厚度(Tb.Th)对肱骨和股骨头、第三掌骨和第三跖骨头、胫骨远端、距骨和第一胸椎的高分辨率显微计算机断层扫描进行量化。我们发现,在大多数解剖部位,黑猩猩的BV/TV显著高于人类,这表明小梁结构存在与局部负荷状态无关的全身差异。在研究的分类群中,前肢和后肢之间BV/TV的差异并未清楚地反映运动负荷的差异。分类群之间在DA方面没有明显的全身差异,因此,该参数可能反映功能并与关节负荷差异有关。这种全身分析方法揭示了整个骨骼以及分类群之间的变异性模式,并有助于识别可能与关节功能相关的小梁结构特征。