Suppr超能文献

评估“虚拟诊所”对尿失禁患者体验、个人及医疗服务提供者护理成本的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluating the impact of a 'virtual clinic' on patient experience, personal and provider costs of care in urinary incontinence: A randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Jones Georgina, Brennan Victoria, Jacques Richard, Wood Hilary, Dixon Simon, Radley Stephen

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 18;13(1):e0189174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189174. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of using a 'virtual clinic' on patient experience and cost in the care of women with urinary incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women, aged > 18 years referred to a urogynaecology unit were randomised to either (1) A Standard Clinic or (2) A Virtual Clinic. Both groups completed a validated, web-based interactive, patient-reported outome measure (ePAQ-Pelvic Floor), in advance of their appointment followed by either a telephone consultation (Virtual Clinic) or face-to-face consultation (Standard Care). The primary outcome was the mean 'short-term outcome scale' score on the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ). Secondary Outcome Measures included the other domains of the PEQ (Communications, Emotions and Barriers), Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), Short-Form 12 (SF-12), personal, societal and NHS costs.

RESULTS

195 women were randomised: 98 received the intervention and 97 received standard care. The primary outcome showed a non-significant difference between the two study arms. No significant differences were also observed on the CSQ and SF-12. However, the intervention group showed significantly higher PEQ domain scores for Communications, Emotions and Barriers (including following adjustment for age and parity). Whilst standard care was overall more cost-effective, this was minimal (£38.04). The virtual clinic also significantly reduced consultation time (10.94 minutes, compared with a mean duration of 25.9 minutes respectively) and consultation costs compared to usual care (£31.75 versus £72.17 respectively), thus presenting potential cost-savings in out-patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

The virtual clinical had no impact on the short-term dimension of the PEQ and overall was not as cost-effective as standard care, due to greater clinic re-attendances in this group. In the virtual clinic group, consultation times were briefer, communication experience was enhanced and personal costs lower. For medical conditions of a sensitive or intimate nature, a virtual clinic has potential to support patients to communicate with health professionals about their condition.

摘要

目的

评估使用“虚拟诊所”对尿失禁女性患者体验及护理成本的影响。

材料与方法

将年龄大于18岁且转诊至泌尿妇科的女性随机分为两组:(1)标准诊所组;(2)虚拟诊所组。两组在预约前均完成一份经过验证的基于网络的交互式患者报告结局测量工具(ePAQ - 盆底功能问卷),随后虚拟诊所组进行电话咨询,标准诊所组进行面对面咨询。主要结局指标为患者体验问卷(PEQ)上的平均“短期结局量表”得分。次要结局指标包括PEQ的其他领域(沟通、情绪和障碍)、客户满意度问卷(CSQ)、简明健康调查量表(SF - 12)、个人、社会及国民医疗服务体系(NHS)成本。

结果

195名女性被随机分组:98人接受干预,97人接受标准护理。主要结局显示两组之间无显著差异。在CSQ和SF - 12上也未观察到显著差异。然而,干预组在沟通、情绪和障碍方面的PEQ领域得分显著更高(包括在对年龄和胎次进行调整后)。虽然标准护理总体上更具成本效益,但差异极小(38.04英镑)。与常规护理相比,虚拟诊所还显著缩短了咨询时间(分别为10.94分钟和平均25.9分钟)以及咨询成本(分别为31.75英镑和72.17英镑),因此在门诊管理方面存在潜在的成本节约。

结论

虚拟诊所对PEQ的短期维度没有影响,总体上不如标准护理具有成本效益,因为该组的复诊率更高。在虚拟诊所组中,咨询时间更短,沟通体验得到增强,个人成本更低。对于敏感或私密性质的医疗状况,虚拟诊所有助于支持患者与医护人员就自身病情进行沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ce/5773012/44505e724189/pone.0189174.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验