Weiss David, Witzel Christoph, Gegenfurtner Karl
Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Iperception. 2017 Dec 6;8(6):2041669517739635. doi: 10.1177/2041669517739635. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
We investigated several sensory and cognitive determinants of colour constancy across 40 illumination hues. In the first experiment, we measured colour naming for the illumination and for the colour induced by the illumination on the colorimetric grey. Results confirmed that the induced colours are approximately complementary to the colour of the illumination. In the second experiment, we measured colour constancy using achromatic adjustments. Average colour constancy was perfect under the blue daylight illumination and decreased in colour directions away from the blue daylight illumination due to undershooting and a strong blue bias. Apart from this blue bias, colour constancy was not related to illumination discrimination and to chromatic detection measured previously with the same setup and stimuli. We also observed a strong negative relationship between the degree of colour constancy and the consensus of naming the illumination colour. Constancy coincided with a low naming consensus, in particular because bluish illumination colours were sometimes seen as achromatic. Blue bias and category consensus alone explained >68%, and all determinants together explained >94% of the variance of achromatic adjustments. These findings suggest that colour constancy is optimised for blue daylight.
我们研究了40种照明色调下颜色恒常性的几种感官和认知决定因素。在第一个实验中,我们测量了照明的颜色命名以及照明在比色灰色上所诱导出的颜色的命名。结果证实,诱导出的颜色与照明颜色大致互补。在第二个实验中,我们使用消色差调整来测量颜色恒常性。在蓝色日光照明下,平均颜色恒常性表现完美,而在远离蓝色日光照明的颜色方向上,由于调整不足和强烈的蓝色偏差,颜色恒常性下降。除了这种蓝色偏差外,颜色恒常性与先前使用相同设置和刺激测量的照明辨别和色度检测无关。我们还观察到颜色恒常性程度与照明颜色命名的一致性之间存在强烈的负相关关系。恒常性与低命名一致性相吻合,特别是因为带蓝色的照明颜色有时被视为无色。仅蓝色偏差和类别一致性就解释了消色差调整方差的>68%,所有决定因素共同解释了>94%的方差。这些发现表明,颜色恒常性针对蓝色日光进行了优化。