Wu Yin-Sheng, Xu Bing, Yu Zuo-Qu, Wang Xiao-Feng, Dai Shou-Wang, Li Min, Tong Pei-Jian
Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wenzhou Affilated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, China;
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Mar 25;30(3):247-251. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.03.012.
To observe the biomechanical effects of the lateral wall of the femur in treating femoral intertrochanteric fractures with intramedullary or extramedullary fixation to guide the choice of clinical fixed methods.
Twelve adults femur specimens of intertrochanteric fractures were belong to the type A1 of the AO fracture classification and randomly divided into the lateral wall complete PFNA group, the lateral wall complete PF-LCP group, the lateral wall breakage PFNA group, lateral wall breakage PF-LCP group, every group had 3 specimens. The four groups of specimens were subjected to compressive loading experiment with Universal Material Testing Machine. The maximum loading force was observed. The distance between fracture ends, the distance of fracture dislocation and the sliding distance of the fracture fragments along the intertrochanteric were measured with Calipers.
The maximum loading force of lateral wall complete PFNA group were larger than that of lateral wall complete PF-LCP group, and the maximum loading force of lateral wall breakage PFNA group were larger than that of lateral wall breakage PF-LCP group, there were significant differences (<0.05). The distance between fracture ends of the four groups before compression were not significant differences(>0.05). The distance between fracture ends, the distance of fracture dislocation and the sliding distance of the fracture fragments were not significant differences between lateral wall complete PFNA group and lateral wall complete PF-LCP group after compression (>0.05). But the distance between fracture ends, the distance of fracture dislocation and the sliding distance of the fracture fragments of lateral wall breakage PFNA group were less than that of lateral wall breakage PF-LCP group(<0.05).
Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures have stronger loading force. Both intramedullary and extramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures have strong stability when the lateral wall of the femur is complete, but intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures is stronger stability than extramedullary fixation when the lateral wall of the femur is broken. So the intramedullary fixation is the first choice for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.
观察股骨外侧壁在股骨转子间骨折髓内或髓外固定治疗中的生物力学效应,以指导临床固定方法的选择。
12例成人股骨转子间骨折标本属于AO骨折分型的A1型,随机分为外侧壁完整的股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)组、外侧壁完整的锁定加压接骨板(PF-LCP)组、外侧壁破损的PFNA组、外侧壁破损的PF-LCP组,每组3个标本。对四组标本用万能材料试验机进行压缩加载实验。观察最大加载力。用卡尺测量骨折端间距、骨折移位距离及骨折块沿转子间的滑动距离。
外侧壁完整的PFNA组最大加载力大于外侧壁完整的PF-LCP组,外侧壁破损的PFNA组最大加载力大于外侧壁破损的PF-LCP组,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。压缩前四组骨折端间距差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。压缩后外侧壁完整的PFNA组与外侧壁完整的PF-LCP组骨折端间距、骨折移位距离及骨折块滑动距离差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。但外侧壁破损的PFNA组骨折端间距、骨折移位距离及骨折块滑动距离小于外侧壁破损的PF-LCP组(<0.05)。
股骨转子间骨折髓内固定具有更强的加载力。当股骨外侧壁完整时,股骨转子间骨折髓内和髓外固定均具有较强稳定性,但当股骨外侧壁破损时,股骨转子间骨折髓内固定稳定性强于髓外固定。所以髓内固定是治疗股骨转子间骨折的首选。