• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问题不在于专业出版,而在于发表论文或出局的文化。

The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture.

机构信息

Departamento de Informática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avda. Universidad 30, 28911, Leganés, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):617-619. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0015-z. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-017-0015-z
PMID:29350352
Abstract

The publication of scientific papers has become increasingly problematic in the last decades. Even if we agree that a renewed model is needed for peer-reviewed scientific publication, we think the problem does not essentially lie in professional publishing-with economic incentives-but in the publish-or-perish culture that dominates the lives of researchers and academics.

摘要

在过去几十年中,科学论文的发表变得越来越成问题。即使我们同意需要为同行评审的科学出版建立一个新的模式,我们认为问题的本质并不在于专业出版(有经济激励),而在于主导研究人员和学者生活的发表或灭亡文化。

相似文献

1
The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture.问题不在于专业出版,而在于发表论文或出局的文化。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):617-619. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0015-z. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
2
The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.非洲研究人员在国际期刊上发表研究文章的障碍、同行评审过程以及掠夺性期刊这一有争议的问题:一篇评论
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 14;32:119. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.119.18351. eCollection 2019.
3
Publish or perish: ensuring longevity in nurse education-evaluation of a strategy to engage academics, students, and clinicians in publication activity.发表或灭亡:确保护理教育的长久发展——评估一项使学者、学生和临床医生参与发表活动的策略。
J Prof Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;29(4):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.024.
4
Preprints: a Timely Counterbalance for Big Data-Driven Research.预印本:大数据驱动研究的及时平衡力量
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2179-2181. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05746-w. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
[Publish & Perish; research on research and researchers].[发表与消逝;关于研究及研究者的研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2017;59(7):406-413.
6
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
7
Publish or perish, publish and perish.不发表就灭亡,发表了也灭亡。
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Apr;16(2):103. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a31870.
8
A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.一种提高同行评审完整性的方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1603-1610. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9960-9. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
9
Publish or perish. The debate from a global perspective.不发表就出局。全球视角下的辩论。
Aust Fam Physician. 1999 May;28(5):425-6.
10
Publish? Perish the thought!
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989 Nov;46(5):598-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1989.191.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmet Expectations: Life Scientists' Views on Biorisk and Responsibility.未满足的期望:生命科学家对生物风险与责任的看法
Appl Biosaf. 2025 Jun 5;30(2):112-123. doi: 10.1089/apb.2024.0052. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Validation of publication pressure questionnaire-revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital.中文护士版科研发表压力问卷的信效度检验。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7713-7724. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2012. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Motivating Proactive Biorisk Management.激励主动生物风险管理。

本文引用的文献

1
A New Science Publishing System for a Budding Science Publishing Crisis.新兴科学出版系统应对萌芽中的科学出版危机
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):805-808. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9902-6. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
2
Time for Revelation: Unmasking the Anonymity of Blind Reviewers.启示时刻:揭开同行评审匿名者的面纱。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):313-315. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9778-x. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
3
The Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful.科学计量学泡沫被认为是有害的。
Health Secur. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):46-60. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0101. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
Stem cell therapy for type 1 diabetes: a scientometric assessment of global research during the twenty-first century.1型糖尿病的干细胞治疗:21世纪全球研究的科学计量学评估
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2022 Sep 12;21(2):1679-1687. doi: 10.1007/s40200-022-01120-1. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Global university performance. Bibliometric analysis of the ARWU platform (2003-2020).全球大学表现。ARWU 平台的文献计量分析(2003-2020)。
Tunis Med. 2021;99(7):693-705.
6
Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.开放科学中的累积优势动态与公平性威胁:一项范围综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 19;9(1):211032. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Improving the reproducibility of findings by updating research methodology.通过更新研究方法提高研究结果的可重复性。
Qual Quant. 2022;56(3):1597-1609. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01196-6. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
Variations in surgical peer-reviewed publications among editorial board members, associate editors and their respective journal: Towards maintaining academic integrity.编辑委员会成员、副主编及其各自期刊在外科同行评审出版物方面的差异:旨在维护学术诚信。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Oct 27;60:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.042. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective.拓展研究诚信:文化实践视角。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 9;27(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00291-z.
10
Author misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: protocol for an exploratory case study.作者单位关系不当的描述:一项探索性案例研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e023983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023983.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):227-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9632-6. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.确保期刊同行评审的质量、公正性和诚信:编辑的可能作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):169-88. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9625-5. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Blind manuscript submission to reduce rejection bias?采用盲投方式以减少拒稿偏见?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):535-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9547-7. Epub 2014 Apr 20.