Pizzera Alexandra, Möller Carsten, Plessner Henning
a German Sport University Cologne.
b Heidelberg University.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018 Mar;89(1):112-119. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2017.1412392. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Gymnastics judges and former gymnasts have been shown to be quite accurate in detecting errors and accurately judging performance.
The purpose of the current study was to examine if this superior judging performance is reflected in judges' gaze behavior.
Thirty-five judges were asked to judge 21 gymnasts who performed a skill on the vault in a video-based test. Classifying 1 sample on 2 different criteria, judging performance and gaze behavior were compared between judges with a higher license level and judges with a lower license level and between judges who were able to perform the skill (specific motor experience [SME]) and those who were not.
The results revealed better judging performance among judges with a higher license level compared with judges with a lower license level and more fixations on the gymnast during the whole skill and the landing phase, specifically on the head and arms of the gymnast. Specific motor experience did not result in any differences in judging performance; however, judges with SME showed similar gaze patterns to those of judges with a high license level, with 1 difference in their increased focus on the gymnasts' feet.
Superior judging performance seems to be reflected in a specific gaze behavior. This gaze behavior appears to partly stem from judges' own sensorimotor experiences for this skill and reflects the gymnasts' perspective onto the skill.
研究表明,体操裁判和前体操运动员在检测失误和准确评判表现方面相当准确。
本研究的目的是检验这种卓越的评判表现是否体现在裁判的注视行为中。
35名裁判被要求在一项基于视频的测试中,对21名在跳马项目中完成一项动作的体操运动员进行评判。根据两种不同标准对样本进行分类,比较了高等级执照裁判和低等级执照裁判之间,以及能够完成该动作的裁判(特定运动经验[SME])和不能完成该动作的裁判之间的评判表现和注视行为。
结果显示,高等级执照裁判的评判表现优于低等级执照裁判,并且在整个动作过程和落地阶段,对体操运动员的注视更多,特别是对体操运动员的头部和手臂。特定运动经验在评判表现上未产生任何差异;然而,有特定运动经验的裁判与高等级执照裁判的注视模式相似,唯一的区别是他们对体操运动员脚部的关注度增加。
卓越的评判表现似乎体现在特定的注视行为中。这种注视行为似乎部分源于裁判自身对该动作的感觉运动经验,并反映了体操运动员对该动作的视角。