Wolframm Inga, Reuter Peter, Zaharia Iulia, Vernooij Johannes
Applied Research Centre, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences, 6880 GB Velp, The Netherlands.
Tobii Technology GmbH, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;14(14):2025. doi: 10.3390/ani14142025.
This study investigated the visual search behavior of equestrian dressage judges at different expertise levels during the assessment of Grand Prix horse-rider combinations. Twenty judges (11 foundational level, 9 advanced level) participated in the study, with their eye movements recorded using Tobii Fusion Eyetracker as they evaluated video recordings of dressage tests. Fixation metrics, namely Total Duration of Fixation (TDF), Average Duration of Fixation (ADF), and Total Number of Fixations (TNF), were analyzed across four Areas of Interest (AOIs): front, back, rider, and horse's feet. Statistical analysis utilized linear mixed-effects models. Results demonstrated that judges consistently focused more on the front of the horse, with additional differences in fixation duration and frequency based on judge experience and specific movements. Advanced judges focused more on the horses' feet, suggesting they draw meaning from specific areas indicative of performance quality. Conversely, foundational level judges focused more on the rider, reflecting different evaluative priorities at lower levels of the sport. These findings suggest that judges focus on a limited number of highly relevant areas, differing across movements and expertise levels. The study underscores the necessity of understanding both gaze behavior and subsequent interpretations of visual information to increase judging transparency, fairness, and equine welfare.
本研究调查了不同专业水平的盛装舞步裁判在评估大奖赛马匹与骑手组合时的视觉搜索行为。20名裁判(11名基础水平,9名高级水平)参与了该研究,在他们评估盛装舞步测试视频记录时,使用Tobii Fusion眼动仪记录他们的眼动情况。注视指标,即注视总时长(TDF)、平均注视时长(ADF)和注视总数(TNF),在四个感兴趣区域(AOI)进行分析:马的前部、后部、骑手和马蹄。统计分析采用线性混合效应模型。结果表明,裁判始终更关注马的前部,并且根据裁判经验和特定动作,在注视时长和频率上存在额外差异。高级裁判更关注马蹄,这表明他们从指示表现质量的特定区域获取信息。相反,基础水平的裁判更关注骑手,这反映了在该运动较低水平时不同的评估重点。这些发现表明,裁判关注数量有限的高度相关区域,这些区域在不同动作和专业水平上存在差异。该研究强调了理解注视行为以及随后对视觉信息的解读对于提高评判透明度、公正性和马匹福利的必要性。