Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, 5790 University Ave, Halifax, NS, Canada.
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):455-63. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0278-6. Epub 2013 May 5.
The goal of this study was to synthesize evidence comparing cancer screening receipt between cancer survivors and non-cancer controls by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases from inception through April 1, 2010 using search terms related to cancer, survivorship, and cancer screening. Studies were included if they reported a comparison of cancer screening receipt between cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. We performed a meta-analysis on the effect of cancer survivorship on breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening receipt.
Our search strategy identified 1,778 titles, of which 20 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. In our meta-analyses, cancer survivors were more likely to be screened for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer than non-cancer controls (pooled odds ratio, 1.27; 95 % CI, 1.19-1.36). We observed significant heterogeneity between studies, most of which remained unexplained after subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Important contextual factors, such as how screening programs operate, were not reported in the primary literature. Many cancer survivors (along with non-cancer controls) still did not receive cancer screening.
Compared with non-cancer controls, cancer survivors receive more frequent screening for new primary breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancers. Future research should seek to determine whether increased uptake of cancer screening is associated with improved outcomes during cancer survivorship.
Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that cancer survivors received more frequent screening for second primary breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancers than non-cancer controls. As many cancer survivors are at an increased risk of developing a second primary cancer, future research should seek to determine whether this increased uptake of cancer screening in cancer survivors leads to improved outcomes during cancer survivorship.
本研究旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析,综合比较癌症幸存者和非癌症对照者接受癌症筛查的证据。
我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库,检索时间从建库至 2010 年 4 月 1 日,使用了与癌症、生存和癌症筛查相关的检索词。如果研究报告了癌症幸存者和非癌症对照者之间癌症筛查接受情况的比较,我们将其纳入分析。我们对癌症生存对乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌筛查接受情况的影响进行了荟萃分析。
我们的检索策略共识别出 1778 篇标题,其中 20 篇符合纳入/排除标准。在荟萃分析中,癌症幸存者接受乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌筛查的可能性高于非癌症对照者(合并优势比,1.27;95%置信区间,1.19-1.36)。我们观察到研究之间存在显著的异质性,大多数异质性在亚组和敏感性分析后仍无法解释。重要的背景因素,如筛查项目的运作方式,在原始文献中没有报告。许多癌症幸存者(以及非癌症对照者)仍未接受癌症筛查。
与非癌症对照者相比,癌症幸存者接受新原发性乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌筛查的频率更高。未来的研究应致力于确定癌症筛查的增加是否与癌症生存期间的改善结果相关。
我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,癌症幸存者接受新原发性乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌筛查的频率高于非癌症对照者。由于许多癌症幸存者有更高的罹患第二原发性癌症的风险,未来的研究应致力于确定癌症幸存者中这种癌症筛查的增加是否导致癌症生存期间的改善结果。