• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合模态特异性期望以部署空间注意。

Integrating modality-specific expectancies for the deployment of spatial attention.

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.

Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine (INM-4), Research Centre Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 19;8(1):1210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19593-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-19593-7
PMID:29352145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5775425/
Abstract

The deployment of spatial attention is highly sensitive to stimulus predictability. Despite evidence for strong crossmodal links in spatial attentional systems, it remains to be elucidated how concurrent but divergent predictions for targets in different sensory modalities are integrated. In a series of behavioral studies, we investigated the processing of modality-specific expectancies using a multimodal cueing paradigm in which auditory cues predicted the location of visual or tactile targets with modality-specific cue predictability. The cue predictability for visual and tactile targets was manipulated independently. A Bayesian ideal observer model with a weighting factor was applied to trial-wise individual response speed to investigate how the two probabilistic contexts are integrated. Results showed that the degree of integration depended on the level of predictability and on the divergence of the modality-specific probabilistic contexts (Experiments 1-2). However, when the two probabilistic contexts were matched in their level of predictability and were highly divergent (Experiment 3), higher separate processing was favored, especially when visual targets were processed. These findings suggest that modality-specific predictions are flexibly integrated according to their reliability, supporting the hypothesis of separate modality-specific attentional systems that are however linked to guarantee an efficient deployment of spatial attention across the senses.

摘要

空间注意的分配对刺激的可预测性高度敏感。尽管有证据表明空间注意系统中存在很强的跨模态联系,但仍需要阐明如何整合不同感觉模态中目标的并发但不同的预测。在一系列行为研究中,我们使用多模态提示范式研究了模态特异性预期的处理,其中听觉提示以模态特异性提示可预测性预测视觉或触觉目标的位置。视觉和触觉目标的提示可预测性是独立操纵的。应用具有权重因子的贝叶斯理想观察者模型来分析个体在逐次试验中的反应速度,以研究两种概率情境是如何整合的。结果表明,整合程度取决于可预测性水平和模态特异性概率情境的离散程度(实验 1-2)。然而,当两个概率情境在可预测性水平上相匹配且高度离散时(实验 3),更倾向于进行更高的独立处理,尤其是在处理视觉目标时。这些发现表明,模态特异性预测是根据其可靠性灵活整合的,这支持了独立的模态特异性注意系统的假设,这些系统相互联系以确保在不同感觉之间有效地分配空间注意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b3/5775425/206ad52b6ddb/41598_2018_19593_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b3/5775425/e42c0012c6d1/41598_2018_19593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b3/5775425/206ad52b6ddb/41598_2018_19593_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b3/5775425/e42c0012c6d1/41598_2018_19593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b3/5775425/206ad52b6ddb/41598_2018_19593_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating modality-specific expectancies for the deployment of spatial attention.整合模态特异性期望以部署空间注意。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 19;8(1):1210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19593-7.
2
Spatial Attention, Motor Intention, and Bayesian Cue Predictability in the Human Brain.人类大脑中的空间注意力、运动意图与贝叶斯线索可预测性
J Neurosci. 2017 May 24;37(21):5334-5344. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3255-16.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.跨感觉模式的自愿和刺激驱动的空间注意机制之间的相互作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2384-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.
4
Cholinergic stimulation enhances Bayesian belief updating in the deployment of spatial attention.胆碱能刺激增强了空间注意部署中的贝叶斯信念更新。
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 19;34(47):15735-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0091-14.2014.
5
Modulation of auditory spatial attention by visual emotional cues: differential effects of attentional engagement and disengagement for pleasant and unpleasant cues.视觉情绪线索对听觉空间注意的调节:愉快和不愉快线索在注意参与和脱离方面的差异效应。
Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0749-6. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.听觉、触觉和视觉系统中与空间无关的模态驱动的注意捕获。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(3):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1724-x. Epub 2003 Dec 5.
7
The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.概率性特征提示的影响取决于提示抽象的水平。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Mar;234(3):685-94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4487-2. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.跨通道竞争和维度重叠在跨通道注意转换中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Feb;155:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
Cortical Coupling Reflects Bayesian Belief Updating in the Deployment of Spatial Attention.皮质耦合反映了空间注意力部署中的贝叶斯信念更新。
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 19;35(33):11532-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1382-15.2015.
10
The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.准备工作和线索模态在跨通道任务切换中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):318-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-spatial inhibition of return attenuates audiovisual integration owing to modality disparities.非空间返回抑制由于模态差异而减弱视听整合。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2315-2328. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02825-y. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
2
Modality-specific and multisensory mechanisms of spatial attention and expectation.空间注意力和预期的模态特异性及多感官机制。
J Vis. 2020 Aug 3;20(8):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.8.1.
3
What Can Computational Models Learn From Human Selective Attention? A Review From an Audiovisual Unimodal and Crossmodal Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatial Attention, Motor Intention, and Bayesian Cue Predictability in the Human Brain.人类大脑中的空间注意力、运动意图与贝叶斯线索可预测性
J Neurosci. 2017 May 24;37(21):5334-5344. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3255-16.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
2
Functional mechanisms of probabilistic inference in feature- and space-based attentional systems.基于特征和空间的注意系统中概率推理的功能机制。
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:553-564. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
3
Cortical Coupling Reflects Bayesian Belief Updating in the Deployment of Spatial Attention.
计算模型能从人类选择性注意中学到什么?从视听单峰和跨峰视角的综述。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2020 Feb 27;14:10. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00010. eCollection 2020.
皮质耦合反映了空间注意力部署中的贝叶斯信念更新。
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 19;35(33):11532-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1382-15.2015.
4
Cortical hierarchies perform Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception.皮质层级在多感官感知中执行贝叶斯因果推理。
PLoS Biol. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002073. eCollection 2015 Feb.
5
Bayesian model selection for group studies - revisited.贝叶斯模型选择在组研究中的应用 - 再探。
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:971-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.065. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
6
Using Arduino microcontroller boards to measure response latencies.使用 Arduino 微控制器板测量反应时。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1332-46. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0336-z.
7
Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.空间注意力、精准度与贝叶斯推理:眼跳反应速度研究
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Jun;24(6):1436-50. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs418. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
8
Bayesian model selection for group studies.群体研究的贝叶斯模型选择
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1004-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.025. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
9
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.广义线性混合模型:生态学与进化实用指南
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008.
10
Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.用于扫视眼动的学习与决策的集成贝叶斯模型。
Neural Netw. 2008 Nov;21(9):1247-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 7.