• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于扫视眼动的学习与决策的集成贝叶斯模型。

Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

作者信息

Brodersen Kay H, Penny Will D, Harrison Lee M, Daunizeau Jean, Ruff Christian C, Duzel Emrah, Friston Karl J, Stephan Klaas E

机构信息

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

出版信息

Neural Netw. 2008 Nov;21(9):1247-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.neunet.2008.08.007
PMID:18835129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2650512/
Abstract

The neurophysiology of eye movements has been studied extensively, and several computational models have been proposed for decision-making processes that underlie the generation of eye movements towards a visual stimulus in a situation of uncertainty. One class of models, known as linear rise-to-threshold models, provides an economical, yet broadly applicable, explanation for the observed variability in the latency between the onset of a peripheral visual target and the saccade towards it. So far, however, these models do not account for the dynamics of learning across a sequence of stimuli, and they do not apply to situations in which subjects are exposed to events with conditional probabilities. In this methodological paper, we extend the class of linear rise-to-threshold models to address these limitations. Specifically, we reformulate previous models in terms of a generative, hierarchical model, by combining two separate sub-models that account for the interplay between learning of target locations across trials and the decision-making process within trials. We derive a maximum-likelihood scheme for parameter estimation as well as model comparison on the basis of log likelihood ratios. The utility of the integrated model is demonstrated by applying it to empirical saccade data acquired from three healthy subjects. Model comparison is used (i) to show that eye movements do not only reflect marginal but also conditional probabilities of target locations, and (ii) to reveal subject-specific learning profiles over trials. These individual learning profiles are sufficiently distinct that test samples can be successfully mapped onto the correct subject by a naïve Bayes classifier. Altogether, our approach extends the class of linear rise-to-threshold models of saccadic decision making, overcomes some of their previous limitations, and enables statistical inference both about learning of target locations across trials and the decision-making process within trials.

摘要

眼动的神经生理学已得到广泛研究,针对在不确定情况下朝向视觉刺激产生眼动的决策过程,已提出了几种计算模型。一类被称为线性上升至阈值模型的模型,为观察到的外周视觉目标出现与朝向该目标的扫视之间潜伏期的变异性提供了一种经济但广泛适用的解释。然而,到目前为止,这些模型没有考虑跨一系列刺激的学习动态,并且不适用于受试者接触具有条件概率事件的情况。在这篇方法学论文中,我们扩展了线性上升至阈值模型类别以解决这些局限性。具体而言,我们通过结合两个单独的子模型,将先前的模型重新表述为一个生成式分层模型,这两个子模型分别解释了跨试验的目标位置学习与试验内决策过程之间的相互作用。我们推导了一种基于对数似然比的最大似然参数估计方案以及模型比较方法。通过将其应用于从三名健康受试者获取的经验性扫视数据,证明了该集成模型的实用性。模型比较用于:(i)表明眼动不仅反映目标位置的边际概率,还反映条件概率;(ii)揭示受试者在多次试验中的特定学习概况。这些个体学习概况足够独特,以至于朴素贝叶斯分类器可以成功地将测试样本映射到正确的受试者上。总之,我们的方法扩展了扫视决策的线性上升至阈值模型类别,克服了它们先前的一些局限性,并能够对跨试验的目标位置学习和试验内的决策过程进行统计推断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/ff2f0e3db738/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/fcdcf62ab7d4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/eac1653b991b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/6f59940223ee/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/9ac81383bd1e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/94057f008b3c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/888902c150f2/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/c3e1319ef191/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/7cbf5a14d0cf/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/a8577fbd3031/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/ff2f0e3db738/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/fcdcf62ab7d4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/eac1653b991b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/6f59940223ee/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/9ac81383bd1e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/94057f008b3c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/888902c150f2/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/c3e1319ef191/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/7cbf5a14d0cf/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/a8577fbd3031/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb4/2650512/ff2f0e3db738/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.用于扫视眼动的学习与决策的集成贝叶斯模型。
Neural Netw. 2008 Nov;21(9):1247-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
2
Coupled Decision Processes Update and Maintain Saccadic Priors in a Dynamic Environment.耦合决策过程在动态环境中更新并维持扫视先验。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 29;37(13):3632-3645. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3078-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.猴子的扫视反应时间:眼动程序的提前准备是快速扫视发生的主要原因。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3666-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3666.
4
The time course of saccadic decision making: dynamic field theory.扫视决策的时间进程:动态场理论
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1059-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
5
Mutual inhibition and capacity sharing during parallel preparation of serial eye movements.连续眼动平行准备过程中的相互抑制与能力共享。
J Vis. 2012 Mar 20;12(3):17. doi: 10.1167/12.3.17.
6
Task switching as a two-stage decision process.任务切换作为一个两阶段决策过程。
J Neurophysiol. 2006 May;95(5):3146-53. doi: 10.1152/jn.01184.2005. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
7
Adaptive learning via selectionism and Bayesianism, Part I: connection between the two.基于选择主义和贝叶斯主义的适应性学习,第一部分:两者之间的联系。
Neural Netw. 2009 Apr;22(3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.03.018. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
8
The time course of stimulus expectation in a saccadic decision task.扫视决策任务中刺激预期的时间进程。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):2722-30. doi: 10.1152/jn.01238.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
9
The Stochastic Early Reaction, Inhibition, and late Action (SERIA) model for antisaccades.用于反扫视的随机早期反应、抑制和晚期作用(SERIA)模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Aug 2;13(8):e1005692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005692. eCollection 2017 Aug.
10
Saccadic foraging: reduced reaction time to informative targets.扫视觅食:对信息性目标的反应时间缩短
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Apr;41(7):908-13. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12845. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Previous Motor Actions Outweigh Sensory Information in Sensorimotor Statistical Learning.先前的运动动作比感觉信息在感觉运动统计学习中更重要。
eNeuro. 2021 Sep 29;8(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0032-21.2021. Print 2021 Sep-Oct.
2
Integrating modality-specific expectancies for the deployment of spatial attention.整合模态特异性期望以部署空间注意。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 19;8(1):1210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19593-7.
3
Disruption of the Right Temporoparietal Junction Impairs Probabilistic Belief Updating.右侧颞顶联合区受损会损害概率信念更新。

本文引用的文献

1
Neglect as a disorder of prior probability.忽视作为一种先验概率的紊乱。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1566-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.006. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
2
Control of sensorimotor variability by consequences.通过结果对感觉运动变异性的控制。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2255-65. doi: 10.1152/jn.01286.2006. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
3
Learning the value of information in an uncertain world.在一个不确定的世界中了解信息的价值。
J Neurosci. 2017 May 31;37(22):5419-5428. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3683-16.2017. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Cortical Coupling Reflects Bayesian Belief Updating in the Deployment of Spatial Attention.皮质耦合反映了空间注意力部署中的贝叶斯信念更新。
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 19;35(33):11532-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1382-15.2015.
5
Cholinergic stimulation enhances Bayesian belief updating in the deployment of spatial attention.胆碱能刺激增强了空间注意部署中的贝叶斯信念更新。
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 19;34(47):15735-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0091-14.2014.
6
Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.空间注意力、精准度与贝叶斯推理:眼跳反应速度研究
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Jun;24(6):1436-50. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs418. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
7
Can post-error dynamics explain sequential reaction time patterns?错误后动态变化能否解释序列反应时模式?
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 16;3:213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00213. eCollection 2012.
8
The role of risk aversion in non-conscious decision making.风险规避在非意识决策中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 27;3:50. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00050. eCollection 2012.
9
Time scales of representation in the human brain: weighing past information to predict future events.人类大脑中的表征时间尺度:权衡过去信息以预测未来事件。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Apr 26;5:37. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00037. eCollection 2011.
10
A bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty.不确定性下个体学习的贝叶斯基础。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 May 2;5:39. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00039. eCollection 2011.
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1214-21. doi: 10.1038/nn1954. Epub 2007 Aug 5.
4
The time course of stimulus expectation in a saccadic decision task.扫视决策任务中刺激预期的时间进程。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):2722-30. doi: 10.1152/jn.01238.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
5
Bayesian analysis of interleaved learning and response bias in behavioral experiments.行为实验中交错学习与反应偏差的贝叶斯分析。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;97(3):2516-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.00946.2006. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
6
Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.基于概率群体编码的贝叶斯推理。
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1432-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1790. Epub 2006 Oct 22.
7
LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading.LATER模型可预测阅读过程中的扫视潜伏期分布。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Feb;177(2):176-83. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0666-5. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
8
Extended LATER model can account for trial-by-trial variability of both pre- and post-processes.扩展的LATER模型可以解释前后过程的逐次试验变异性。
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1027-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
9
Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations.神经群体对感觉信息的最佳表征。
Nat Neurosci. 2006 May;9(5):690-6. doi: 10.1038/nn1691. Epub 2006 Apr 16.
10
Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson models of primate choice dynamics.灵长类动物选择动力学的线性-非线性-泊松模型
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Nov;84(3):581-617. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.23-05.