Kuhns Anna B, Dombert Pascasie L, Mengotti Paola, Fink Gereon R, Vossel Simone
Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany, and.
J Neurosci. 2017 May 24;37(21):5334-5344. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3255-16.2017. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Predictions about upcoming events influence how we perceive and respond to our environment. There is increasing evidence that predictions may be generated based upon previous observations following Bayesian principles, but little is known about the underlying cortical mechanisms and their specificity for different cognitive subsystems. The present study aimed at identifying common and distinct neural signatures of predictive processing in the spatial attentional and motor intentional system. Twenty-three female and male healthy human volunteers performed two probabilistic cueing tasks with either spatial or motor cues while lying in the fMRI scanner. In these tasks, the percentage of cue validity changed unpredictably over time. Trialwise estimates of cue predictability were derived from a Bayesian observer model of behavioral responses. These estimates were included as parametric regressors for analyzing the BOLD time series. Parametric effects of cue predictability in valid and invalid trials were considered to reflect belief updating by precision-weighted prediction errors. The brain areas exhibiting predictability-dependent effects dissociated between the spatial attention and motor intention task, with the right temporoparietal cortex being involved during spatial attention and the left angular gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex during motor intention. Connectivity analyses revealed that all three areas showed predictability-dependent coupling with the right hippocampus. These results suggest that precision-weighted prediction errors of stimulus locations and motor responses are encoded in distinct brain regions, but that crosstalk with the hippocampus may be necessary to integrate new trialwise outcomes in both cognitive systems. The brain is able to infer the environments' statistical structure and responds strongly to expectancy violations. In the spatial attentional domain, it has been shown that parts of the attentional networks are sensitive to the predictability of stimuli. It remains unknown, however, whether these effects are ubiquitous or if they are specific for different cognitive systems. The present study compared the influence of model-derived cue predictability on brain activity in the spatial attentional and motor intentional system. We identified areas with distinct predictability-dependent activation for spatial attention and motor intention, but also common connectivity changes of these regions with the hippocampus. These findings provide novel insights into the generality and specificity of predictive processing signatures in the human brain.
对即将发生事件的预测会影响我们对环境的感知和反应。越来越多的证据表明,预测可能是基于先前的观察并遵循贝叶斯原则产生的,但对于潜在的皮层机制及其对不同认知子系统的特异性却知之甚少。本研究旨在识别空间注意力和运动意向系统中预测性处理的共同和独特神经特征。23名健康的男女志愿者躺在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中,执行两项概率性提示任务,提示分别为空间提示或运动提示。在这些任务中,提示有效性的百分比随时间不可预测地变化。提示可预测性的逐次试验估计值来自行为反应的贝叶斯观察者模型。这些估计值作为参数回归变量纳入,用于分析血氧水平依赖(BOLD)时间序列。有效和无效试验中提示可预测性的参数效应被认为反映了通过精确加权预测误差进行的信念更新。在空间注意力任务和运动意向任务中,表现出可预测性依赖效应的脑区有所不同,空间注意力任务中右侧颞顶叶皮层参与其中,运动意向任务中左侧角回和前扣带回皮层参与其中。连通性分析表明,这三个区域均显示出与右侧海马体的可预测性依赖耦合。这些结果表明,刺激位置和运动反应的精确加权预测误差在不同的脑区进行编码,但与海马体的相互作用可能是在两个认知系统中整合新的逐次试验结果所必需的。大脑能够推断环境的统计结构,并对预期违背做出强烈反应。在空间注意力领域,已经表明注意力网络的部分区域对刺激的可预测性敏感。然而,这些效应是普遍存在的,还是特定于不同的认知系统,仍然未知。本研究比较了模型推导的提示可预测性对空间注意力和运动意向系统中脑活动的影响。我们识别出了在空间注意力和运动意向方面具有不同可预测性依赖激活的区域,以及这些区域与海马体的共同连通性变化。这些发现为人类大脑中预测性处理特征的普遍性和特异性提供了新的见解。