• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Brazil - comparison of outcomes from different static model types.巴西四价与三价流感疫苗的成本效益——不同静态模型类型结果的比较
Braz J Infect Dis. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.11.004. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Taiwan: A lifetime multi-cohort model.台湾四价与三价流感疫苗的成本效益分析:一项终生多队列模型研究
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Jan 2;13(1):81-89. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1225636. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Impact of quadrivalent influenza vaccines in Brazil: a cost-effectiveness analysis using an influenza transmission model.四价流感疫苗在巴西的影响:基于流感传播模型的成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 9;20(1):1374. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09409-7.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines Compared with Trivalent Influenza Vaccines in Young Children and Older Adults in Korea.韩国儿童和老年人中四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗的成本效果比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Dec;36(12):1475-1490. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0715-5.
5
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of quadrivalent influenza vaccines for seasonal influenza prevention: a dynamic modeling study of Canada and the United Kingdom.四价流感疫苗预防季节性流感的成本效益评估:加拿大和英国的动态模型研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 27;15:465. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1193-4.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent influenza vaccination in at-risk adults and the elderly: an updated analysis in the U.K.高危成年人及老年人中四价流感疫苗接种的成本效益分析:英国的最新分析
J Med Econ. 2015;18(9):746-61. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1044456. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
7
From trivalent to quadrivalent influenza vaccines: Public health and economic burden for different immunization strategies in Spain.从三价流感疫苗到四价流感疫苗:西班牙不同免疫策略的公共卫生和经济负担。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233526. eCollection 2020.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Quadrivalent versus Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in the United States.美国四价与三价流感疫苗的成本效益
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):964-975. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
9
Cost-effectiveness of switching from trivalent to quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines for the at-risk population in Italy.三价流感疫苗向四价流感疫苗切换对意大利高危人群的成本效益分析。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(8):1867-1873. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1469368. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
The potential cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in elderly people and clinical risk groups in the UK: a lifetime multi-cohort model.英国老年人及临床风险群体中四价与三价流感疫苗的潜在成本效益:一项终生多队列模型研究
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):e98437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098437. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Burden of Respiratory Viruses in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC): A Scoping Literature Review.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区呼吸道病毒的经济负担:一项范围界定文献综述
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2025 Sep;19(9):e70148. doi: 10.1111/irv.70148.
2
Cost effectiveness of quadrivalent influenza vaccines in the elderly population of Malaysia.四价流感疫苗在马来西亚老年人群中的成本效益。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):18771. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46079-y.
3
Comparisons in the Health and Economic Assessments of Using Quadrivalent Versus Trivalent Influenza Vaccines: A Systematic Literature Review.四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗的健康和经济评估比较:系统文献回顾。
Value Health. 2023 May;26(5):768-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cell Versus Egg-Based Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Children and Adults in Argentina.阿根廷儿童和成人中细胞培养流感疫苗与鸡蛋培养流感疫苗的成本效益分析。
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;10(10):1627. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101627.
5
Switching from trivalent to quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in Uruguay: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在乌拉圭从三价季节性流感疫苗转换为四价季节性流感疫苗:成本效益分析。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2050653. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2050653. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Switching from Trivalent to Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Argentina.阿根廷从三价季节性流感疫苗转换为四价季节性流感疫苗的成本效益分析。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;9(4):335. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040335.
7
Impact of quadrivalent influenza vaccines in Brazil: a cost-effectiveness analysis using an influenza transmission model.四价流感疫苗在巴西的影响:基于流感传播模型的成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 9;20(1):1374. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09409-7.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines Compared with Trivalent Influenza Vaccines in Young Children and Older Adults in Korea.韩国儿童和老年人中四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗的成本效果比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Dec;36(12):1475-1490. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0715-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of influenza B circulation in Brazil and its relevance to seasonal vaccine composition.巴西乙型流感的流行模式及其与季节性疫苗成分的相关性。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2016 Jan-Feb;20(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
2
Immunogenicity and Safety of an Inactivated Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in US Children 6-35 Months of Age During 2013-2014: Results From A Phase II Randomized Trial.2013 - 2014年美国6至35月龄儿童中一种四价流感灭活疫苗的免疫原性和安全性:一项II期随机试验的结果
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2016 Jun;5(2):170-9. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piv041. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
3
Detection of influenza B lineages from 2001 to 2013 in a tertiary hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.2001年至2013年巴西圣保罗市一家三级医院中乙型流感谱系的检测。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015 Aug;110(5):606-10. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760150044. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
4
The potential cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in elderly people and clinical risk groups in the UK: a lifetime multi-cohort model.英国老年人及临床风险群体中四价与三价流感疫苗的潜在成本效益:一项终生多队列模型研究
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 6;9(6):e98437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098437. eCollection 2014.
5
Evolutionary pattern of reemerging influenza B/Victoria lineage viruses in São Paulo, Brazil, 1996-2012: Implications for vaccine composition strategy.1996-2012 年巴西圣保罗乙型/维多利亚系流感病毒再出现的进化模式:对疫苗成分策略的影响。
J Med Virol. 2013 Nov;85(11):1983-9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23684. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
6
Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized trial in adults aged ≥18 years.在 18 岁及以上成年人中,一种四价流感疫苗候选株与三价流感疫苗的免疫原性、反应原性和安全性:一项 III 期、随机试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jul 24;13:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-343.
7
Comparing influenza vaccine efficacy against mismatched and matched strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较针对错配和匹配毒株的流感疫苗效力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2013 Jun 25;11:153. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-153.
8
Annual all-cause healthcare costs among influenza patients with and without influenza-related complications: analysis of a United States managed care database.患有流感及流感相关并发症患者的年度全因医疗保健费用:美国管理式医疗数据库分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Apr;11(2):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0020-6.
9
Burden of influenza in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区流感负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 Nov;7(6):1017-32. doi: 10.1111/irv.12036. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
10
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.流感疫苗的疗效和效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Jan;12(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70295-X. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

巴西四价与三价流感疫苗的成本效益——不同静态模型类型结果的比较

Cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Brazil - comparison of outcomes from different static model types.

作者信息

Van Bellinghen Laure-Anne, Marijam Alen, Tannus Branco de Araujo Gabriela, Gomez Jorge, Van Vlaenderen Ilse

机构信息

CHESS in Health, Bonheiden, Belgium.

GSK, Wavre, Belgium.

出版信息

Braz J Infect Dis. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.11.004. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjid.2017.11.004
PMID:29352897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9425677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Influenza burden in Brazil is considerable with 4.2-6.4 million cases in 2008 and influenza-like-illness responsible for 16.9% of hospitalizations. Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination may be assessed by different types of models, with limitations due to data availability, assumptions, and modelling approach.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the impact of model complexity, the cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccines in Brazil was estimated using three distinct models: a 1-year decision tree population model with three age groups (FLOU); a more detailed 1-year population model with five age groups (FLORA); and a more complex lifetime multi-cohort Markov model with nine age groups (FLORENCE).

METHODS

Analysis 1 (impact of model structure) compared each model using the same data inputs (i.e., best available data for FLOU). Analysis 2 (impact of increasing granularity) compared each model populated with the best available data for that model.

RESULTS

Using the best data for each model, the discounted cost-utility ratio of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine was R$20,428 with FLOU, R$22,768 with FLORA (versus R$20,428 in Analysis 1), and, R$19,257 with FLORENCE (versus R$22,490 in Analysis 1) using a lifetime horizon. Conceptual differences between FLORA and FLORENCE meant the same assumption regarding increased all-cause mortality in at-risk individuals had an opposite effect on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Analysis 2 versus 1, and a proportionally higher number of vaccinated elderly in FLORENCE reduced this ratio in Analysis 2.

DISCUSSION

FLOU provided adequate cost-effectiveness estimates with data in broad age groups. FLORA increased insights (e.g., in healthy versus at-risk, paediatric, respiratory/non-respiratory complications). FLORENCE provided greater insights and precision (e.g., in elderly, costs and complications, lifetime cost-effectiveness).

CONCLUSION

All three models predicted a cost per quality-adjusted life year gained for quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in the range of R$19,257 (FLORENCE) to R$22,768 (FLORA) with the best available data in Brazil (Appendix A).

摘要

背景

巴西的流感负担相当严重,2008年有420万至640万病例,流感样疾病导致16.9%的住院病例。流感疫苗接种的成本效益可以通过不同类型的模型进行评估,但由于数据可用性、假设和建模方法的限制,这些模型存在局限性。

目的

为了解模型复杂性的影响,使用三种不同的模型估计了巴西四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗的成本效益:一个具有三个年龄组的1年决策树人群模型(FLOU);一个更详细的具有五个年龄组的1年人群模型(FLORA);以及一个更复杂的具有九个年龄组的终生多队列马尔可夫模型(FLORENCE)。

方法

分析1(模型结构的影响)使用相同的数据输入(即FLOU的最佳可用数据)对每个模型进行比较。分析2(粒度增加的影响)使用每个模型的最佳可用数据对每个模型进行比较。

结果

使用每个模型的最佳数据,四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗的贴现成本效益比在FLOU模型中为20428雷亚尔,在FLORA模型中为22768雷亚尔(与分析1中的20428雷亚尔相比),在FLORENCE模型中为19257雷亚尔(与分析1中的22490雷亚尔相比),采用终生视角。FLORA和FLORENCE之间的概念差异意味着,关于高危个体全因死亡率增加的相同假设在分析2与分析1中对增量成本效益比产生了相反的影响,并且FLORENCE中接种疫苗的老年人比例相对较高,这在分析2中降低了该比例。

讨论

FLOU模型利用广泛年龄组的数据提供了足够的成本效益估计。FLORA模型增加了一些见解(例如,在健康人群与高危人群、儿科、呼吸/非呼吸并发症方面)。FLORENCE模型提供了更深入的见解和更高的精确度(例如,在老年人、成本和并发症、终生成本效益方面)。

结论

在巴西使用最佳可用数据时,所有三种模型预测四价流感疫苗与三价流感疫苗相比每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本在FLORENCE模型的19257雷亚尔至FLORA模型的22768雷亚尔之间(附录A)。