Suppr超能文献

腹针治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的临床疗效

[Clinical effect of abdominal acupuncture for diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome].

作者信息

Qin Yu, Yi Wei, Lin Shuxiong, Yang Chunfang, Zhuang Zemin

机构信息

Clinical Medical College of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of CM, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Dec 12;37(12):1265-8. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.12.003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy differences between abdominal acupuncture and western medication for diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with IBS-D were randomly assigned into an acupuncture group (30 cases after 1 dropping) and a western medication group (28 cases after 2 dropping). Acupuncture was used at points [Zhongwan (CV 12), Xiawan (CV 10), Qihai (CV 6), Guanyuan (CV 4)], points [bilateral Huaroumen (ST 24), Wailing (ST 26)], point [bilateral Daheng (SP 15)], once every other day, 3 times a week. Pinaverium bromide tablet was used orally in the western medication group, 50 mg a time, 3 times a day. All the treatment was given for 4 weeks in the two groups. IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) and clinical symptom scores for abdominal pain and distension, diarrhea, poor stool output, defecation urgency and stool abnormality were observed before and after the treatment as well as 3 months after treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded and the effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

①After treatment and at follow-up, the IBS-SSS scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment (all <0.01). Compared with the western medication group, the scores and the improvements between the two time points and before treatment were better in the acupuncture group (<0.05, <0.01). ②The symptom scores in the two groups after treatment were lower than those before treatment including abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, poor stool output, defecation urgency and stool abnormality (<0.05, <0.01), and the scores of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, poor stool output and stool abnormality in the acupuncture group were lower than those in the western medication group (<0.05, <0.01). ③The total effective rate and the cured and remarkable effective rate of the acupuncture group were higher than those of the western medication group [(86.7% (26/30) vs 64.3% (18/28), <0.05; 70.0% (21/30) vs 35.7% (10/28), <0.01)], and the therapeutic efficacy of the acupuncture group was better than that of the western medication group (<0.05). There was no adverse reaction.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal acupuncture is more effective for IBS-D than western medication and can relieve abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, poor stool output, stool abnormality, with long-term effect.

摘要

目的

比较腹针与西药治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)的疗效差异。

方法

将61例IBS-D患者随机分为针刺组(脱落1例后30例)和西药组(脱落2例后28例)。针刺选取穴位[中脘(CV 12)、下脘(CV 10)、气海(CV 6)、关元(CV 4)]、[双侧滑肉门(ST 24)、外陵(ST 26)]、[双侧大横(SP 15)],隔日1次,每周3次。西药组口服匹维溴铵片,每次50 mg,每日3次。两组均治疗4周。观察治疗前、治疗后及治疗后3个月的IBS症状严重程度评分(IBS-SSS)以及腹痛腹胀、腹泻、排便不畅、排便急迫和大便异常的临床症状评分。记录不良反应并评估疗效。

结果

①治疗后及随访时,两组IBS-SSS评分均低于治疗前(均P<0.01)。与西药组比较,针刺组两个时间点之间及与治疗前的评分及改善情况更好(P<0.05,P<0.01)。②两组治疗后症状评分均低于治疗前,包括腹痛、腹胀、腹泻、排便不畅、排便急迫和大便异常(P<0.05,P<0.01),且针刺组腹痛、腹胀、腹泻、排便不畅和大便异常评分低于西药组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。③针刺组总有效率及治愈显效率高于西药组[(86.7%(26/30)对64.3%(18/28),P<0.05;70.0%(21/30)对35.7%(10/28),P<0.01],针刺组治疗效果优于西药组(P<0.05)。未出现不良反应。

结论

腹针治疗IBS-D较西药更有效,能缓解腹痛、腹胀、腹泻、排便不畅、大便异常,且疗效持久。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验