Suppr超能文献

医院轮班工人的客观体力活动。

Objectively measured physical activity of hospital shift workers.

机构信息

Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 May 1;44(3):265-273. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3709. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

Abstract

Objectives Shift work may alter workers' leisure-time and occupational physical activity (PA) levels, which might be one of the potential underlying mechanisms of the negative health effects of shift work. Therefore, we compared objectively measured PA levels between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Methods Data were used from Klokwerk+, a cohort study examining the health effects of shift work among healthcare workers employed in hospitals. In total, 401 shift workers and 78 non-shift workers were included, all of whom wore Actigraph GT3X accelerometers for up to seven days. Time spent sedentary, standing, walking, running, stairclimbing, and cycling during leisure time and at work was estimated using Acti4 software. Linear regression was used to compare proportions of time spent in these activities between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Results Average accelerometer wear-time was 105.9 [standard deviation (SD) 14.0] waking hours over an average of 6.9 (SD 0.6) days. No differences between hospital shift and non-shift workers were found in leisure-time PA (P>0.05). At work, shift workers were less sedentary [B=-10.6% (95% CI -14.3- -6.8)] and spent larger proportions of time standing [B=9.5% (95% CI 6.4-12.6)] and walking [B=1.2% (95% CI 0.1-2.2)] than non-shift workers. However, these differences in occupational PA became smaller when the number of night shifts during accelerometer wear-time increased. Conclusions Leisure-time PA levels of hospital shift workers were similar to those of non-shift workers, but shift workers were less sedentary and more physically active (ie, standing/walking) at work. Future research to the role of occupational activities in the health effects of shift work is recommended.

摘要

目的

轮班工作可能会改变工人的闲暇时间和职业体力活动(PA)水平,这可能是轮班工作对健康产生负面影响的潜在机制之一。因此,我们比较了医院轮班和非轮班工人的 PA 水平。

方法

本研究使用了 Klokwerk+的数据,这是一项研究医院保健工作者轮班工作健康影响的队列研究。共纳入 401 名轮班工人和 78 名非轮班工人,所有工人都佩戴 Actigraph GT3X 加速度计,最长佩戴 7 天。使用 Acti4 软件估算闲暇时间和工作时的久坐、站立、步行、跑步、爬楼梯和骑自行车时间。使用线性回归比较医院轮班和非轮班工人在这些活动中花费的时间比例。

结果

平均加速度计佩戴时间为 105.9 [标准差(SD)14.0]清醒时间,平均佩戴 6.9 [SD 0.6]天。医院轮班和非轮班工人在闲暇时间 PA 方面没有差异(P>0.05)。在工作中,轮班工人的久坐时间减少[B=-10.6%(95% CI -14.3- -6.8)],站立时间[B=9.5%(95% CI 6.4-12.6)]和步行时间[B=1.2%(95% CI 0.1-2.2)]比例更大。然而,当佩戴加速度计期间夜班数量增加时,这些职业 PA 差异会变小。

结论

医院轮班工人的闲暇时间 PA 水平与非轮班工人相似,但轮班工人在工作时更少久坐,更活跃(即站立/行走)。建议进一步研究职业活动在轮班工作健康影响中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验